Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2009-12-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

331
views
359
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

The design of the New York City (NYC) high school match involved trade-offs among efficiency, stability, and strategy-proofness that raise new theoretical questions. We analyze a model with indifferences-ties-in school preferences. Simulations with field data and the theory favor breaking indifferences the same way at every school-single tiebreaking-in a student-proposing deferred acceptance mechanism. Any inefficiency associated with a realized tiebreaking cannot be removed without harming student incentives. Finally, we empirically document the extent of potential efficiency loss associated with strategy-proofness and stability, and direct attention to some open questions. (JEL C78, D82, I21).

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1257/aer.99.5.1954

Publication Info

Abdulkadiroǧlu, A, PA Pathak and AE Roth (2009). Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match. American Economic Review, 99(5). pp. 1954–1978. 10.1257/aer.99.5.1954 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3354.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.