Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wright, Barry
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-04T17:49:03Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-04T17:49:03Z
dc.date.issued 2009-05-04T17:49:03Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/1278
dc.description.abstract We consider several types of information with which to di erentiate preferential ballot voting systems. After establishing a formalism with which to discuss voting methods in a mathematical context, we show that the aggregation of transitive individual preferences does not always result in a unique transitive social preference ordering. Exposition on eleven different preferential ballot voting systems is then given, as possible methods for resolving elections with three or more candidates. To evaluate these methods, we introduce several desirable conditions on voting systems, and then determine which are satis ed by the various methods studied. Extending this, we construct continuous measures of two conditions, to gain more information when methods do not satisfy certain conditions. Finally, we use election simulations (on a uniform vote distribution) to measure how often each pair of election methods provide the same result. We submit this information as suitable for making a reasoned choice of election method in practical application. en_US
dc.format.extent 288931 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject Voting Systems en_US
dc.title Objective Measures of Preferential Ballot Voting Systems en_US
dc.department Mathematics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record