DukeSpace

Empirical Model Particularities and Belief in the Natural Rate Hypothesis

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kim, Jinbang en_US
dc.contributor.author De Marchi, Neil en_US
dc.contributor.author Morgan, Mary en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-09T15:29:30Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-09T15:29:30Z
dc.date.issued 1995 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/1909
dc.description.abstract Economists test to strengthen conviction, though mostly without disclosing how this can occur. There is a clear line of logical implication from theory to model; but in the process there may be a narrowing and specialization of the hypothesis so that it is not clear what weight should be placed upon the result of a test on the model. Empirical models and tests may be narrowed down so far that they involve certain nonunique characteristics of the original theories. Even when a hypothesis is confirmed, no reverse inference back to theory can be made from such tests. We illustrate how a number of such 'characteristics tests' worked, drawing on American economists's tests of the natural rate hypothesis in the 1970s. en_US
dc.format.extent 4129854 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Econometrics en_US
dc.subject Econometric testing en_US
dc.subject Empirical models en_US
dc.subject Natural rate hypothesis en_US
dc.title Empirical Model Particularities and Belief in the Natural Rate Hypothesis en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record