Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kuran, Timur en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-09T15:30:56Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-09T15:30:56Z
dc.date.issued 1987 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/1935
dc.description.abstract He makes us first of all realize that being black in the world of economists does make a difference. And then he tells a story in which fortune has the better part with him as the unwilling participant who nevertheless repeatedly generates controversy with his ideas. Such a story, which is almost an apology for his being where he is, forms a stark contrast with the one by Friedman or by Samuelson. Friedman also gives credit to chance in his story but claims his stage without self-consciousness and reservation; the latter sees himself so much the orchestrator of his own story that he chooses to tell it in the third person... en_US
dc.format.extent 634429 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Economic Literature en_US
dc.subject human desire en_US
dc.subject utility en_US
dc.title Human Desire and Economic Satisfaction en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record