Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hirsch, Abraham en_US
dc.contributor.author De Marchi, Neil en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-09T15:44:44Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-09T15:44:44Z
dc.date.issued 1984 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2104
dc.description.abstract Milton Friedman has been taken by some to be a follower of the logical positivists and by others a disciple of the philosopher Karl Popper, but until recently not enough has been said by way of support for such claims to make it possible to evaluate their substance. Recently, however, Laurence Boland (1979) has suggested that Friedman should rather be considered an "instrumentalist," meaning by this that for Friedman "theories are convenient and useful ways of (logically) generating what have turned out to be true (or successful) predictions or conclusions" (pp. 508-09) and Boland has given us a substantive analysis of his position. More recently Boland has combined forces with William Frazer (1983) to try to demonstrate that while Friedman is an instrumental thinker, and instrumentalismis a point of view against which Popper has argued vigorously still Friedman's instrumentalismis in some sense compatible with Popper's falsificationist doctrine. These efforts are certainly in the right direction. A major reason there has been so little return on such a vast amount of discussion about Friedman's methodologyi s that t4e many participantsin the debate have focussed on one or another aspect of Friedman's formulations without trying to determine what general point of view underlay his approach. Boland has dug deeper, and with Frazer has set out to show one of the fruits of this approach. The effort is therefore to be applauded for what it tries to do. But for reasons that will be given in this comment, Frazer and Boland wind up with a quite distorted picture. en_US
dc.format.extent 1273855 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher The American Economic Review en_US
dc.subject Friedman en_US
dc.subject history en_US
dc.title Methodology: A Comment on Frazer and Boland, I en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record