Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Marcus, Joel en_US
dc.contributor.author Thiessen, Matthew en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-10T20:18:25Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-10T20:18:25Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2465
dc.description Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract <p>In his important work, The Beginnings of Jewishness, Shaye J. D. Cohen has argued that what it meant to be a Jew underwent considerable revision during the second century B.C.E. While previously a Jew was defined in terms of ethnicity (by which Cohen means biological descent), in the wake of Judaism's sustained encounter with Hellenism, the term Jew came to be defined as an ethno-religion--that is, one could choose to become a Jew. Nonetheless, the recent work of scholars, such as Christine E. Hayes, has demonstrated that there continued to exist in early Judaism a strain of thinking that, in theory at least, excluded the possibility that Gentiles could become Jews. This genealogical exclusion, found in works such as Jubilees, was highly indebted to the "holy seed" theology evidenced in Ezra-Nehemiah, a theology which defined Jewishness in genealogical terms.</p> <p>This dissertation will attempt to contribute to a greater understanding of differing conceptions of circumcision in early Judaism, one that more accurately describes the nature of Jewish thought with regard to Jewishness, circumcision, and conversion. In terms of methodology, my dissertation will combine historical criticism with a literary approach to the texts under consideration. The dissertation will focus on texts from the Hebrew Bible as well as Jewish texts from the Second Temple period as these writings provide windows into the various forms of Judaism from which the early Christian movement arose.</p> <p>Beginning with the Hebrew Bible, I will argue that there is no evidence that circumcision was considered to be a rite of conversion to Israelite religion. In fact, circumcision, particularly the infant circumcision instantiated within Israelite and early Jewish society excludes from the covenant those not properly descended from Abraham. In the Second Temple period, many Jews did begin to conceive of Jewishness in terms which enabled Gentiles to become Jews. Nonetheless, some Jews found this definition of Jewishness problematic, and defended the borders of Jewishness by reasserting a strictly genealogical conception of Jewish identity. Consequently, some Gentiles who underwent conversion to Judaism in this period faced criticism because of their suspect genealogy. Our sources record such exclusion with regard to the Herodians, Idumeans who had converted to Judaism. </p> <p>Additionally, a more thorough examination of how circumcision and conversion were perceived by Jews in the Second Temple period will be instrumental in better understanding early Christianity. It is the argument of this dissertation that further attention to a definition of Jewishness that was based on genealogical descent has broader implications for understanding the variegated nature of early Christian mission to the Gentiles in the first century C.E.</p> en_US
dc.format.extent 3427790 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject Religion, Biblical Studies en_US
dc.subject Religion, General en_US
dc.subject Jewish Studies en_US
dc.subject circumcision en_US
dc.subject conversion en_US
dc.subject ethnicity en_US
dc.subject genealogy en_US
dc.subject identity en_US
dc.subject Judaism en_US
dc.title Genealogy, Circumcision, and Conversion in Early Judaism and Christianity en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.department Religion en_US
duke.embargo.months 60
duke.embargo.release 2016-05-01

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record