| dc.contributor.author | Leijonhufvud, A. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Roy, Weintraub, | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-28T18:49:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-06-28T18:49:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1974 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2539 | |
| dc.description.abstract | I fully agree with E. R. Weintraub on the two main points: (i) Wells is correct in substance in rejecting those interpretations of the General Theory that attribute to it a “labor demand” function identical to the marginal product of labor ~chedule;(~ii ) but Wells’ equations permit the interpretation that he wants to exclude, and his accompanying verbal argument is not likely to convince the authors that he criticizes... | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 573059 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | History of Political Economy | en_US |
| dc.subject | general equilibrium theory | en_US |
| dc.title | Keynes'Employment Function | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| dc.department | Economics |