Negotiating at the Boundary: Patinkin vs. Phipps

dc.contributor.author	Gayer, T.	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Weintraub, E Roy	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2010-06-28T18:49:44Z
dc.date.available	2010-06-28T18:49:44Z
dc.date.issued	2000	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Gayer, T. and Roy Weintraub. Negotiating at the Boundary: Patinkin vs. Phipps. History of Political Economy. 32:3 (2000): 441-471. Print.
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2540
dc.description.abstract	Economists and mathematiciansthems elvesdo not fully understand the way they have negotiated the more or less rigid boundary that separatestheir disciplines. Scholarsin both fieldsha ve contested the role of mathematicsin economicsand the legitimate place of mathematics in economics; moreover, the uses that economists have made of mathematicsare many and varied and have hardly been stable...	en_US
dc.format.extent	125842 bytes
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.publisher	Duke University Press
dc.subject	economic science	en_US
dc.subject	mathematical methods	en_US
dc.subject	programming in economics	en_US
dc.title	Negotiating at the Boundary: Patinkin vs. Phipps	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article	en_US
dc.department	Economics
dc.relation.journal	History of Political Economy