Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author De Marchi, Neil en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-28T18:50:35Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-28T18:50:35Z
dc.date.issued 1983
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2572
dc.description.abstract What sorts of changes should we expect to see following the advent of a new specialist journal? Will the flow of articles from the related subdiscipline which appear in generalist journals diminish? Will the new journal act as a catalyst? One can easily imagine that papers of a more specialist character will be attracted to the new journal, but these may be diverted from other journals, or represent a sort of latent supply, the work of ‘discouraged’ scholars who have found no outlet in the generalist journals. It may also turn out that, almost by tacit agreement between authors and editors, the new journal comes to be ‘allocated’ papers on narrowly defined or limited-interest topics, while the space previously given to such work in generalist journals remains available but is filled-appropriately- by papers still within the purview of the subdiscipline, but of wider than specialist appeal. en_US
dc.format.extent 1212297 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher History of Political Economy en_US
dc.subject HOPE en_US
dc.subject history en_US
dc.title HOPE and the Journal Literature in the History of Economic Thought en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record