Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hoover, Dr Kevin en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-28T19:05:26Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-28T19:05:26Z
dc.date.issued 2004-10-13
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2635
dc.description.abstract The popular image of the scientific revolution usually pits young revolutionaries against old conservatives. Freeman Dyson (2004, p. 16) observes that, in particle physics in the mid-20th century, something had to change. But in the revolution of quantum electrodynamics, Einstein, Dirac, Heisenberg, Born, and Schödinger were old revolutionaries, while the winners, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga, were young conservatives. Post-Walrasian economics is not a doctrine, but a slogan announcing that something has to change. Most of the self-conscious efforts to forge a post-Walrasian economics are due to old radicals. Here I want to explore the space of the young conservative: the future is past, particularly in the methodology of Alfred Marshall’s methodological essay, “The Present Position of Economics” (1885). The radical approach identifies the problem as Walrasian theory and seeks to replace it with something better and altogether different. The conservative approach says that theory is not the problem. The problem is rather to establish an empirical discipline that connects theory to the world. Marshall’s methodology places the relationship between theory and empirical tools on center stage. In North America, if not in Europe, the dominant tools of macroeconometrics are the vector autoregression (VAR) and calibration techniques. These techniques reached their current status as the result of two nearly simultaneous reactions to the Cowles-Commission program, which dominated macroeconometrics during the two decades 1950-1970. These are the famous Lucas critique, and the practically influential, if less storied, Sims critique. I will briefly consider the nature of these two critiques and, then, the competing Walrasian and Marshallian visions of the role of theory in econometrics. I conclude with some suggestions about how to do Marshallian macroeconometrics. en_US
dc.format.extent 159796 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Post Walrasian Macroeconomics: Beyond the Dyanamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. en_US
dc.subject marshall en_US
dc.subject post walrasian econometrics en_US
dc.title The Past as the Future: The Marshallian Approach to Post-Walrasian Econometrics en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record