DukeSpace

The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Graham, Daniel en_US
dc.contributor.author Cook, Philip en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-28T19:05:30Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-28T19:05:30Z
dc.date.issued 1977-02 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2637
dc.description.abstract Insurance and protection against various kinds of losses are both valuable activities provided to a large and perhaps increasing extent by the public sector. If these activities are to be organized at an appropriate level of intensity, it is necessary to have a conceptual understanding of their value to the individual. While I. Ehrlich and G. Becker1 have provided a theoretical development of individual demands for insurance and self-protection (and the interactions between these two activities) for the case of commodities that are valued appropriately in the market place, a similar theory is lacking for the large class of commodities that are essentially unique or irreplaceable (commodities for which there are no perfect market substitutes) such as family snapshots, the family pet, good health, the life of a beloved spouse or child, etc. In this paper we present a new theoretical characterization of such commodities and develop some results concerning the demand for insurance and the value of increases in the level of protection for such commodities. Replaceable commodities are shown to be a special case of the more general theory. en_US
dc.format.extent 1372271 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Readings in Insurance Economics en_US
dc.subject insurance en_US
dc.subject protection en_US
dc.title The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.department Economics

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record