Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Landry, John S.
dc.contributor.author Biden, Edmund N.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-16T19:28:13Z
dc.date.available 2010-07-16T19:28:13Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.citation MEC '02 : the next generation : University of New Brunswick's Myoelectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium, Fredericton, N.B., Canada, August 21-23, 2002 : conference proceedings. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 1551310295 9781551310299
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2676
dc.description.abstract Generally, a prosthetic wrist has one degree of freedom in a supination/pronation sense. Some do allow bending of the wrist [1-4], however, due to the complexity of integration and operation, they are not as commonly used. The restricted motion of the prosthetic wrist is compensated for by additional motion of the shoulder and elbow. Not only can this additional motion appear awkward making the person self-conscious [5], but it may also increase the risk of joint injury [6]. In an attempt to balance function, cosmesis, and “dynamic cosmesis” (minimal compensatory motion), the prosthetist aligns the wrist with the forearm in some combination of flexion/extension and ulnar/radial deviation. Changing the alignment once it is fixed requires significant effort. Therefore, having a sense of the optimal alignment would be very beneficial. Guidelines for wrist alignment do exist [7 and 8], but while some consider them “very applicable”[9], others feel “there is a need for updated text materials” [10]. These guidelines were written over thirty years ago (1958 and 1971 respectively) and this lag of standards behind technology has left prosthetists to develop their own alignment procedures that sometimes contradict those of their colleagues. Where one prosthetist aligns a wrist at 10 degrees extension, another uses slight ulnar deviation and flexion [11-13]. While the experienced prosthetist has a practical knowledge from which to decide on an individual wrist alignment, the novice practitioner requires guidelines on which to base decisions. Our goal was to determine which, if any, of the wrist alignment angles commonly used allows elbow and shoulder motions to be closest to “normal”, resulting in optimal dynamic cosmesis. en_US
dc.format.extent 116679 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Myoelectric Symposium en_US
dc.subject wrist alignment en_US
dc.subject wrist en_US
dc.subject prosthetic hand en_US
dc.title OPTIMAL FIXED WRIST ALIGNMENT FOR BELOW-ELBOW, POWERED, PROSTHETIC HANDS en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record