| dc.description.abstract |
Pattern Recognition is a useful tool for deciphering movement intent from myoelectric signals.
In order to be clinically viable over time, recognition paradigms must be capable of adapting
with the user. Most existing paradigms are static, although two forms of adaptation have
received limited attention: Supervised adaptation achieves high accuracy, since the intended
class is known, but at the cost of repeated cumbersome training sessions. Unsupervised
adaptation attempts to achieve high accuracy without explicitly being told the intended class,
thus achieving adaptation that is invisible to the user at the cost of reduced accuracy. This paper
reports a novel adaptive experiment on eight subjects that allowed a post-hoc comparison of four
supervised and three unsupervised adaptation paradigms. All supervised adaptation paradigms
reduced error over time by at least 23%. Most unsupervised adaptation paradigms failed to
achieve statistically significant reductions in error due to the uncertainty of the correct class.
One method that selected high-confidence samples showed the most practical potential, although
other methods warrant future investigation outside of a laboratory setting. The ability to provide
supervised adaptation should be incorporated into any clinically viable pattern recognition
controller, and unsupervised adaptation should receive renewed interest in order to provide
invisible adaptation. |
en_US |