DukeSpace

Vascular structures for volumetric cooling and mechanical strength

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bejan, Adrian en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-15T16:46:41Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-15T16:46:41Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Wang,K. -M;Lorente,S.;Bejan,A.. 2010. Vascular structures for volumetric cooling and mechanical strength. Journal of Applied Physics 107(4): 44901-44901. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0021-8979 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3378
dc.description.abstract When solid material is removed in order to create flow channels in a load carrying structure, the strength of the structure decreases. On the other hand, a structure with channels is lighter and easier to transport as part of a vehicle. Here, we show that this trade off can be used for benefit, to design a vascular mechanical structure. When the total amount of solid is fixed and the sizes, shapes, and positions of the channels can vary, it is possible to morph the flow architecture such that it endows the mechanical structure with maximum strength. The result is a multifunctional structure that offers not only mechanical strength but also new capabilities necessary for volumetric functionalities such as self-healing and self-cooling. We illustrate the generation of such designs for strength and fluid flow for several classes of vasculatures: parallel channels, trees with one, two, and three bifurcation levels. The flow regime in every channel is laminar and fully developed. In each case, we found that it is possible to select not only the channel dimensions but also their positions such that the entire structure offers more strength and less flow resistance when the total volume (or weight) and the total channel volume are fixed. We show that the minimized peak stress is smaller when the channel volume (phi) is smaller and the vasculature is more complex, i.e., with more levels of bifurcation. Diminishing returns are reached in both directions, decreasing phi and increasing complexity. For example, when phi=0.02 the minimized peak stress of a design with one bifurcation level is only 0.2% greater than the peak stress in the optimized vascular design with two levels of bifurcation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher AMER INST PHYSICS en_US
dc.relation.isversionof doi:10.1063/1.3294697 en_US
dc.subject bifurcation en_US
dc.subject cooling en_US
dc.subject mechanical strength en_US
dc.subject solid structure en_US
dc.subject composite-materials en_US
dc.subject channels en_US
dc.subject repair en_US
dc.subject damage en_US
dc.subject sizes en_US
dc.subject grids en_US
dc.subject side en_US
dc.subject physics, applied en_US
dc.title Vascular structures for volumetric cooling and mechanical strength en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Version of Record en_US
duke.date.pubdate 2010-2-15 en_US
duke.description.endpage 44901 en_US
duke.description.issue 4 en_US
duke.description.startpage 44901 en_US
duke.description.volume 107 en_US
dc.relation.journal Journal of Applied Physics en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record