Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Costanzo, Philip R en_US
dc.contributor.author O'Neil, Dennis P en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-08-24T14:53:18Z
dc.date.available 2007-08-24T14:53:18Z
dc.date.issued 2007-05-07 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/385
dc.description Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract Personality traits have been used extensively over the past forty years in assessing leadership potential, with varying degrees of success. A major limitation of this research has been the measures of personality. Another important limitation has been the availability of quantifiable measures of leader effectiveness. A third limitation is the lack of longitudinal studies. Because of these limitations, researchers have had difficulty determining the strength of personality traits as predictors of leadership effectiveness over time. Recent studies have used the Five Factor Model of personality to predict leadership effectiveness (e.g., Hogan, Curphy, & Hogan, 1994; Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002; McCormack & Mellor, 2002); and researchers in positive psychology (e.g., Seligman, Steen, Park, & Peterson, 2005; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) have suggested that character strength and virtues (i.e., courage, temperance, and transcendence) might also offer an approach useful in predicting leadership success. This research builds on these approaches and examined two trait-based instruments, the Big Five instrument (NEO-PI-R) and the Values in Action Inventory of Strength (VIA-IS) instrument as they relate to leader effectiveness. Using undergraduates at the United States Military Academy as participants, the research examines the relationship and efficacy of the NEO-PI-R and the VIA-IS in predicting leadership effectiveness over a two and a half year study. Regression analysis demonstrated that conscientiousness was the most significant predictor of leadership effectiveness. However, latent growth curve analysis suggests that there are three distinct patterns of leadership effectiveness. Using mixture modeling, these trajectories are best explained by the personality factors and virtue variables of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and temperance. The findings of this study have broad implications for emergent leader selection, leader development programs, and executive coaching in organizations. en_US
dc.format.extent 1629411 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject Psychology, Social en_US
dc.subject Psychology, Developmental en_US
dc.subject Leadership en_US
dc.subject Leadership Effectiveness en_US
dc.subject Leader Effectiveness en_US
dc.subject Personality en_US
dc.subject Virtues en_US
dc.subject Character Strengths en_US
dc.title Predicting Leader Effectiveness: Personality Traits and Character Strengths en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.department Psychology en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record