Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wharton, Annabel J en_US
dc.contributor.author Dillon, Jennifer Reed en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2008-01-02T16:33:25Z
dc.date.available 2008-01-02T16:33:25Z
dc.date.issued 2007-12-14 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/430
dc.description Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation documents and analyzes the architecture of the working-class bathhouse - its emergence in the nineteenth-century and revision and continued elaboration in the twentieth. It is a case study that examines how social ideas about modernity, health, and the body were translated into the built environment at a formative moment in Western urbanization. The first two chapters take a transnational perspective, with a survey of several urban centers (London, New York, Montreal). Chapter Three and Four focus in on Berlin as the central case study. The hygiene movement was deeply concerned with the built environment from its inception. Concepts of circulation and order were imbued with powerful health values, producing designs for the bathhouse that emphasized separation, regulation and a radically simplified space. Changing concepts of public life and the civic body shaped architectures of hygiene and inflected their decorative programs. A historical, spatial narrative of architecture and the body politic is opened up by a history of the bathhouse, which crosses Old World-New World, Historicist-Modernist, and Wilhelmine-Weimar boundaries. The substance of this research is drawn from previously unexamined archival and archaeological evidence from city bathhouses constructed in Berlin during the Wilhelmine period (Turmstrasse, Schillingsbrücke, Baerwaldstrasse, Dennowitzstrasse, Oderbergerstrasse and Gerichtstrasse Volksbadeanstalten), as well as the Weimar period (Mitte and Lichtenberg). The discussion of Weimar bathhouses includes a reading of Strandbad Wannsee (Martin Wagner, Richard Ermisch), Stoedieck and Poelzig's plans for the Thermenpalast (1929), and the graphic record of Heinrich Zille's <em>Rund um's Freibad</em> (1926). Critical perspectives rooted in the spatial politics of Lefebvre, Bourdieu, Benjamin, and Althusser help evaluate bathhouse architecture as a representational medium, a productive gadget, and a medical technology. The resulting history argues not only that social hygiene played different kinds of roles in the development of modern architecture, but also that changing concepts of the hygienic body generated diverse modes of interaction between the individual and the public sphere. en_US
dc.format.extent 30563760 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject Art History en_US
dc.subject Architecture en_US
dc.subject History, European en_US
dc.title Modernity, Sanitation and the Public Bath: Berlin, 1896-1933, as Archetype en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.department Art History en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record