DukeSpace

Bayesian inference of the number of factors in gene-expression analysis: application to human virus challenge studies

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chen, Bo en_US
dc.contributor.author Chen, Minhua en_US
dc.contributor.author Paisley, John en_US
dc.contributor.author Carin, Lawrence en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-21T17:27:57Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-21T17:27:57Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Chen,Bo;Chen,Minhua;Paisley,John;Zaas,Aimee;Woods,Christopher;Ginsburg,Geoffrey S.;Hero,Alfred,,III;Lucas,Joseph;Dunson,David;Carin,Lawrence. 2010. Bayesian inference of the number of factors in gene-expression analysis: application to human virus challenge studies. Bmc Bioinformatics 11( ): 552-552. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2105 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/4336
dc.description.abstract Background: Nonparametric Bayesian techniques have been developed recently to extend the sophistication of factor models, allowing one to infer the number of appropriate factors from the observed data. We consider such techniques for sparse factor analysis, with application to gene-expression data from three virus challenge studies. Particular attention is placed on employing the Beta Process (BP), the Indian Buffet Process (IBP), and related sparseness-promoting techniques to infer a proper number of factors. The posterior density function on the model parameters is computed using Gibbs sampling and variational Bayesian (VB) analysis. Results: Time-evolving gene-expression data are considered for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Rhino virus, and influenza, using blood samples from healthy human subjects. These data were acquired in three challenge studies, each executed after receiving institutional review board (IRB) approval from Duke University. Comparisons are made between several alternative means of per-forming nonparametric factor analysis on these data, with comparisons as well to sparse-PCA and Penalized Matrix Decomposition (PMD), closely related non-Bayesian approaches. Conclusions: Applying the Beta Process to the factor scores, or to the singular values of a pseudo-SVD construction, the proposed algorithms infer the number of factors in gene-expression data. For real data the "true" number of factors is unknown; in our simulations we consider a range of noise variances, and the proposed Bayesian models inferred the number of factors accurately relative to other methods in the literature, such as sparse-PCA and PMD. We have also identified a "pan-viral" factor of importance for each of the three viruses considered in this study. We have identified a set of genes associated with this pan-viral factor, of interest for early detection of such viruses based upon the host response, as quantified via gene-expression data. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher BIOMED CENTRAL LTD en_US
dc.relation.isversionof doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-552 en_US
dc.subject selection en_US
dc.subject models en_US
dc.subject lasso en_US
dc.subject biochemical research methods en_US
dc.subject biotechnology & applied microbiology en_US
dc.subject mathematical & computational biology en_US
dc.title Bayesian inference of the number of factors in gene-expression analysis: application to human virus challenge studies en_US
dc.title.alternative en_US
dc.description.version Version of Record en_US
duke.date.pubdate 2010-11-9 en_US
duke.description.endpage 552 en_US
duke.description.issue en_US
duke.description.startpage 552 en_US
duke.description.volume 11 en_US
dc.relation.journal Bmc Bioinformatics en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record