DukeSpace

So Different, yet So Similar: Meta-Analysis and Policy Modeling of Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials among Brazilians and Indians

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zammar, Guilherme en_US
dc.contributor.author Meister, Henrique en_US
dc.contributor.author Shah, Jatin en_US
dc.contributor.author Phadtare, Amruta en_US
dc.contributor.author Cofiel, Luciana en_US
dc.contributor.author Pietrobon, Ricardo en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-21T17:32:20Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-21T17:32:20Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Zammar,Guilherme;Meister,Henrique;Shah,Jatin;Phadtare,Amruta;Cofiel,Luciana;Pietrobon,Ricardo. 2010. So Different, yet So Similar: Meta-Analysis and Policy Modeling of Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials among Brazilians and Indians. Plos One 5(12): e14368-e14368. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/4586
dc.description.abstract Background: With the global expansion of clinical trials and the expectations of the rise of the emerging economies known as BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China), the understanding of factors that affect the willingness to participate in clinical trials of patients from those countries assumes a central role in the future of health research. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) of willingness to participate in clinical trials among Brazilian patients and then we compared it with Indian patients (with results of another SRMA previously conducted by our group) through a system dynamics model. Results: Five studies were included in the SRMA of Brazilian patients. Our main findings are 1) the major motivation for Brazilian patients to participate in clinical trials is altruism, 2) monetary reimbursement is the least important factor motivating Brazilian patients, 3) the major barrier for Brazilian patients to not participate in clinical trials is the fear of side effects, and 4) Brazilian patients are more likely willing to participate in clinical trials than Indians. Conclusion: Our study provides important insights for investigators and sponsors for planning trials in Brazil (and India) in the future. Ignoring these results may lead to unnecessary fund/time spending. More studies are needed to validate our results and for better understanding of this poorly studied theme. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE en_US
dc.relation.isversionof doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014368 en_US
dc.subject hiv vaccine trials en_US
dc.subject rheumatoid-arthritis patients en_US
dc.subject injection-drug en_US
dc.subject users en_US
dc.subject rio-de-janeiro en_US
dc.subject monetary incentives en_US
dc.subject system dynamics en_US
dc.subject efficacy en_US
dc.subject trial en_US
dc.subject men en_US
dc.subject attitudes en_US
dc.subject recruitment en_US
dc.subject biology en_US
dc.subject multidisciplinary sciences en_US
dc.title So Different, yet So Similar: Meta-Analysis and Policy Modeling of Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials among Brazilians and Indians en_US
dc.title.alternative en_US
dc.description.version Version of Record en_US
duke.date.pubdate 2010-12-16 en_US
duke.description.endpage e14368 en_US
duke.description.issue 12 en_US
duke.description.startpage e14368 en_US
duke.description.volume 5 en_US
dc.relation.journal Plos One en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record