DukeSpace

Assessment of LD Matrix Measures for the Analysis of Biological Pathway Association

DukeSpace

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Qin, Xuejun en_US
dc.contributor.author Hauser, Elizabeth en_US
dc.contributor.author Crosslin, David R.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-21T17:32:24Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-21T17:32:24Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Crosslin,David R.;Qin,Xuejun;Hauser,Elizabeth R.. 2010. Assessment of LD Matrix Measures for the Analysis of Biological Pathway Association. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 9(1): 35-35. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1544-6115 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/4611
dc.description.abstract Complex diseases will have multiple functional sites, and it will be invaluable to understand the cross-locus interaction in terms of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between those sites (epistasis) in addition to the haplotype-LD effects. We investigated the statistical properties of a class of matrix-based statistics to assess this epistasis. These statistical methods include two LD contrast tests (Zaykin et al., 2006) and partial least squares regression (Wang et al., 2008). To estimate Type 1 error rates and power, we simulated multiple two-variant disease models using the SIMLA software package. SIMLA allows for the joint action of up to two disease genes in the simulated data with all possible multiplicative interaction effects between them. Our goal was to detect an interaction between multiple disease-causing variants by means of their linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns with other markers. We measured the effects of marginal disease effect size, haplotype LD, disease prevalence and minor allele frequency have on cross-locus interaction (epistasis). In the setting of strong allele effects and strong interaction, the correlation between the two disease genes was weak (r = 0.2). In a complex system with multiple correlations (both marginal and interaction), it was difficult to determine the source of a significant result. Despite these complications, the partial least squares and modified LD contrast methods maintained adequate power to detect the epistatic effects; however, for many of the analyses we often could not separate interaction from a strong marginal effect. While we did not exhaust the entire parameter space of possible models, we do provide guidance on the effects that population parameters have on cross- locus interaction. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher BERKELEY ELECTRONIC PRESS en_US
dc.relation.isversionof doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1561 en_US
dc.subject epistasis en_US
dc.subject linkage disequilibrium en_US
dc.subject complex disease en_US
dc.subject cardiovascular disease en_US
dc.subject linkage-disequilibrium patterns en_US
dc.subject principal-components en_US
dc.subject gene en_US
dc.subject population en_US
dc.subject stroke en_US
dc.subject atherosclerosis en_US
dc.subject variants en_US
dc.subject protein en_US
dc.subject tests en_US
dc.subject power en_US
dc.subject biochemistry & molecular biology en_US
dc.subject statistics & probability en_US
dc.title Assessment of LD Matrix Measures for the Analysis of Biological Pathway Association en_US
dc.title.alternative en_US
dc.description.version Version of Record en_US
duke.date.pubdate 2010-00-00 en_US
duke.description.endpage 35 en_US
duke.description.issue 1 en_US
duke.description.startpage 35 en_US
duke.description.volume 9 en_US
dc.relation.journal Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record