| dc.contributor.author | Lipschutz, Robert D. | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-03T20:00:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-10-03T20:00:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1995 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | From "MEC 95," Proceedings of the 1995 MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada: August, 1995. Copyright University of New Brunswick. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10161/4876 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The prosthetic design being discussed is that of a tanstadial myoelectric, dual site-dual control system, The residual limb is, in this case, not the factor for variance of pi osthetic design, however, it is other extenuating circumstances that resulted from a fairly common surgical procedure. The patient fitted with this prosthesis was scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), better known as the "cabbage procedure" In the weeks subsequent to this CABG the patient became a quadrimembral amputee. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Myoelectric Symposium | en_US |
| dc.title | Simple Solutions For A Complex Problem: Variations Of A Transradial Myoelectric Prosthetic Design | en_US |