| dc.contributor.author | Kovasckitz, Liz | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-27T13:46:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-11-27T13:46:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-11-27 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the alternatives development process for a North Carolina Department of Transportation new location roadway project. The case study will identify how potential project conflicts were avoided or resolved through a commitment to a comprehensive evaluation of a full range of alternatives, frequent agency and public coordination and maintaining flexibility. This approach reduced the length of time typically needed for a project of this size to reach the selection of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative by approximately 40 percent and will help to streamline the permitting process. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.subject | NEPA, Environment, North Carolina Department of Transportation | en_US |
| dc.title | Maintaining Flexibility and Options in Alternatives Development: A Case Study of the Successful Use of Modeling, Agency Coordination and Public Involvement to Determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative for a 17-Mile Transportation Project | en_US |
| dc.type | Report | en_US |