Ruef, MBaum, JACDobrev, SDVanWitteloostuijn, A2023-02-272023-02-2720060742-3322https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26657Although recent public attention has focused on boom-and-bust cycles in industries and financial markets, organizational theorists have made only limited contributions to our understanding of this issue. In this chapter, I argue that a distinctive strategic insight into the mechanisms generating boom-and-bust cycles arises from a focus on entrepreneurial inertia - the lag time exhibited by organizational founders or investors entering a market niche. While popular perceptions of boom-and-bust cycles emphasize the deleterious effect of hasty entrants or overvaluation, I suggest instead that slow, methodical entries into an organizational population or market may pose far greater threats to niche stability. This proposition is explored analytically, considering the development of U.S. medical schools since the mid-18th century. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Social SciencesBusinessManagementBusiness & EconomicsDOMINANT DESIGNSSOCIAL-STRUCTUREIRON CAGEEVOLUTIONDENSITYSELECTIONDYNAMICSINDUSTRYECOLOGYMODELJournal article2023-02-27