Browsing by Author "Aljurf, Mahmoud"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Influence of nucleated cell dose on overall survival of unrelated cord blood transplantation for patients with severe acquired aplastic anemia: a study by eurocord and the aplastic anemia working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation.(Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2011-01) Peffault de Latour, Regis; Purtill, Duncan; Ruggeri, Annalisa; Sanz, Guillermo; Michel, Gerard; Gandemer, Virginie; Maury, Sebastien; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Bonfim, Carmen; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Gluckman, Eliane; Socié, Gerard; Passweg, Jakob; Rocha, VandersonInformation is scarce on outcomes after unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). We retrospectively analyzed 71 patients (median age, 13 years; 28 adults) with SAA (9 with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria [PNH]) who received a single-unit (n = 57; 79%) or double-unit UCBT (n = 14; 19%) in 32 centers between 1996 and 2009. A reduced-intensity conditioning regimen was provided in 68% of the patients. The cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil recovery was 51% ± 6% at day 60, with significantly better engraftment seen in recipients of higher prefreezing total nucleated cell (TNC) dose (>3.9 10(7)/kg; hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; P = .05). The CI of platelet engraftment at day 180 posttransplantation was 37% ± 7%, that of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 20% ± 5%, and that of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 18% ± 5%. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 3-83 months), the estimated probability of 3-year overall survival (OS) was 38% ± 6%. Significantly improved OS was seen in recipients of >3.9 10(7) TNCs/kg prefreezing (45%, compared with 18% for recipients of ≤ 3.9 10(7) TNC/kg; HR, 0.4; P = .007). These results highlight the fundamental role of cell dose for both engraftment and OS in patients with SAA undergoing UCBT.Item Open Access Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.(Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021-08) Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A; Kumar, Ambuj; Ayala, Ernesto; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Nishihori, Taiga; Marsh, Rebecca; Burroughs, Lauri M; Majhail, Navneet; Al-Homsi, A Samer; Al-Kadhimi, Zaid S; Bar, Merav; Bertaina, Alice; Boelens, Jaap J; Champlin, Richard; Chaudhury, Sonali; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai; El-Jawahri, Areej; Fanning, Suzanne; Fraint, Ellen; Gergis, Usama; Giralt, Sergio; Hamilton, Betty K; Hashmi, Shahrukh K; Horn, Biljana; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Jacobsohn, David A; Jain, Tania; Johnston, Laura; Kanate, Abraham S; Kansagra, Ankit; Kassim, Adetola; Kean, Leslie S; Kitko, Carrie L; Knight-Perry, Jessica; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Liu, Hien; MacMillan, Margaret L; Mahmoudjafari, Zahra; Mielcarek, Marco; Mohty, Mohamad; Nagler, Arnon; Nemecek, Eneida; Olson, Timothy S; Oran, Betul; Perales, Miguel-Angel; Prockop, Susan E; Pulsipher, Michael A; Pusic, Iskra; Riches, Marcie L; Rodriguez, Cesar; Romee, Rizwan; Rondon, Gabriela; Saad, Ayman; Shah, Nina; Shaw, Peter J; Shenoy, Shalini; Sierra, Jorge; Talano, Julie; Verneris, Michael R; Veys, Paul; Wagner, John E; Savani, Bipin N; Hamadani, Mehdi; Carpenter, Paul AAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for certain hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. The field of allo-HCT has witnessed significant advances, including broadening indications for transplantation, availability of alternative donor sources, less toxic preparative regimens, new cell manipulation techniques, and novel GVHD prevention methods, all of which have expanded the applicability of the procedure. These advances have led to clinical practice conundrums when applying traditional definitions of hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, because these may vary based on donor type, cell source, cell dose, primary disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and conditioning intensity, among other variables. To address these contemporary challenges, we surveyed a panel of allo-HCT experts in an attempt to standardize these definitions. We analyzed survey responses from adult and pediatric transplantation physicians separately. Consensus was achieved for definitions of neutrophil and platelet recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, but not for delayed engraftment. Here we highlight the complexities associated with the management of mixed donor chimerism in malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases, which remains an area for future research. We recognize that there are multiple other specific, and at times complex, clinical scenarios for which clinical management must be individualized.Item Open Access Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis.(Blood advances, 2020-05) Gowin, Krisstina; Ballen, Karen; Ahn, Kwang Woo; Hu, Zhen-Huan; Ali, Haris; Arcasoy, Murat O; Devlin, Rebecca; Coakley, Maria; Gerds, Aaron T; Green, Michael; Gupta, Vikas; Hobbs, Gabriela; Jain, Tania; Kandarpa, Malathi; Komrokji, Rami; Kuykendall, Andrew T; Luber, Kierstin; Masarova, Lucia; Michaelis, Laura C; Patches, Sarah; Pariser, Ashley C; Rampal, Raajit; Stein, Brady; Talpaz, Moshe; Verstovsek, Srdan; Wadleigh, Martha; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Angel Diaz, Miguel; Avalos, Belinda R; Bacher, Ulrike; Bashey, Asad; Beitinjaneh, Amer M; Cerny, Jan; Chhabra, Saurabh; Copelan, Edward; Cutler, Corey S; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gadalla, Shahinaz M; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Grunwald, Michael R; Hashmi, Shahrukh K; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A; Kindwall-Keller, Tamila; Kröger, Nicolaus; Lazarus, Hillard M; Liesveld, Jane L; Litzow, Mark R; Marks, David I; Nathan, Sunita; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F; Pawarode, Attaphol; Rowe, Jacob M; Savani, Bipin N; Savoie, Mary Lynn; Seo, Sachiko; Solh, Melhem; Tamari, Roni; Verdonck, Leo F; Yared, Jean A; Alyea, Edwin; Popat, Uday; Sobecks, Ronald; Scott, Bart L; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Mesa, Ruben; Saber, WaelAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.