Browsing by Author "Blaha, Michael J"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A clinician's guide to the ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention: the Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease and American College of Cardiology Cardiosource Approach to the Million Hearts Initiative.
    (Clinical cardiology, 2013-07) Hsu, Steven; Ton, Van-Khue; Dominique Ashen, M; Martin, Seth S; Gluckman, Ty J; Kohli, Payal; Sisson, Stephen D; Blumenthal, Roger S; Blaha, Michael J
    Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide. Fortunately, it is often preventable with early adoption of lifestyle modification, prevention of risk factor onset, and aggressive treatment of existing risk factors. The Million Hearts Initiative is an effort by the Centers for Disease Control that aims to prevent 1 million myocardial infarctions and strokes over the next 5 years. As part of this initiative, we present a simply organized "ABCDE" approach for guiding a consistent comprehensive approach to managing cardiovascular risk in daily clinical practice. ABCDE stands for assessment of risk, antiplatelet therapy, blood pressure management, cholesterol management, cigarette/tobacco cessation, diet and weight management, diabetes prevention and treatment, and exercise, interventions regularly used to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk. Throughout this article we summarize recommendations related to each topic and reference landmark trials and data that support our approach. We believe that the ABCDE approach will be the core framework for addressing CV risk in our effort to prevent CVD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinician's guide to the updated ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention.
    (Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014-09) Kohli, Payal; Whelton, Seamus P; Hsu, Steven; Yancy, Clyde W; Stone, Neil J; Chrispin, Jonathan; Gilotra, Nisha A; Houston, Brian; Ashen, M Dominique; Martin, Seth S; Joshi, Parag H; McEvoy, John W; Gluckman, Ty J; Michos, Erin D; Blaha, Michael J; Blumenthal, Roger S
    To facilitate the guideline-based implementation of treatment recommendations in the ambulatory setting and to encourage participation in the multiple preventive health efforts that exist, we have organized several recent guideline updates into a simple ABCDEF approach. We would remind clinicians that evidence-based medicine is meant to inform recommendations but that synthesis of patient-specific data and use of appropriate clinical judgment in each individual situation is ultimately preferred.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.
    (European heart journal, 2019-02) Pennells, Lisa; Kaptoge, Stephen; Wood, Angela; Sweeting, Mike; Zhao, Xiaohui; White, Ian; Burgess, Stephen; Willeit, Peter; Bolton, Thomas; Moons, Karel GM; van der Schouw, Yvonne T; Selmer, Randi; Khaw, Kay-Tee; Gudnason, Vilmundur; Assmann, Gerd; Amouyel, Philippe; Salomaa, Veikko; Kivimaki, Mika; Nordestgaard, Børge G; Blaha, Michael J; Kuller, Lewis H; Brenner, Hermann; Gillum, Richard F; Meisinger, Christa; Ford, Ian; Knuiman, Matthew W; Rosengren, Annika; Lawlor, Debbie A; Völzke, Henry; Cooper, Cyrus; Marín Ibañez, Alejandro; Casiglia, Edoardo; Kauhanen, Jussi; Cooper, Jackie A; Rodriguez, Beatriz; Sundström, Johan; Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth; Dankner, Rachel; Nietert, Paul J; Davidson, Karina W; Wallace, Robert B; Blazer, Dan G; Björkelund, Cecilia; Donfrancesco, Chiara; Krumholz, Harlan M; Nissinen, Aulikki; Davis, Barry R; Coady, Sean; Whincup, Peter H; Jørgensen, Torben; Ducimetiere, Pierre; Trevisan, Maurizio; Engström, Gunnar; Crespo, Carlos J; Meade, Tom W; Visser, Marjolein; Kromhout, Daan; Kiechl, Stefan; Daimon, Makoto; Price, Jackie F; Gómez de la Cámara, Agustin; Wouter Jukema, J; Lamarche, Benoît; Onat, Altan; Simons, Leon A; Kavousi, Maryam; Ben-Shlomo, Yoav; Gallacher, John; Dekker, Jacqueline M; Arima, Hisatomi; Shara, Nawar; Tipping, Robert W; Roussel, Ronan; Brunner, Eric J; Koenig, Wolfgang; Sakurai, Masaru; Pavlovic, Jelena; Gansevoort, Ron T; Nagel, Dorothea; Goldbourt, Uri; Barr, Elizabeth LM; Palmieri, Luigi; Njølstad, Inger; Sato, Shinichi; Monique Verschuren, WM; Varghese, Cherian V; Graham, Ian; Onuma, Oyere; Greenland, Philip; Woodward, Mark; Ezzati, Majid; Psaty, Bruce M; Sattar, Naveed; Jackson, Rod; Ridker, Paul M; Cook, Nancy R; D'Agostino, Ralph B; Thompson, Simon G; Danesh, John; Di Angelantonio, Emanuele; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
    AIMS:There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied. METHODS AND RESULTS:Using individual-participant data on 360 737 participants without CVD at baseline in 86 prospective studies from 22 countries, we compared the Framingham risk score (FRS), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), pooled cohort equations (PCE), and Reynolds risk score (RRS). We calculated measures of risk discrimination and calibration, and modelled clinical implications of initiating statin therapy in people judged to be at 'high' 10 year CVD risk. Original risk algorithms were recalibrated using the risk factor profile and CVD incidence of target populations. The four algorithms had similar risk discrimination. Before recalibration, FRS, SCORE, and PCE over-predicted CVD risk on average by 10%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, whereas RRS under-predicted by 10%. Original versions of algorithms classified 29-39% of individuals aged ≥40 years as high risk. By contrast, recalibration reduced this proportion to 22-24% for every algorithm. We estimated that to prevent one CVD event, it would be necessary to initiate statin therapy in 44-51 such individuals using original algorithms, in contrast to 37-39 individuals with recalibrated algorithms. CONCLUSION:Before recalibration, the clinical performance of four widely used CVD risk algorithms varied substantially. By contrast, simple recalibration nearly equalized their performance and improved modelled targeting of preventive action to clinical need.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
    (Circulation, 2014-01) Go, Alan S; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Roger, Véronique L; Benjamin, Emelia J; Berry, Jarett D; Blaha, Michael J; Dai, Shifan; Ford, Earl S; Fox, Caroline S; Franco, Sheila; Fullerton, Heather J; Gillespie, Cathleen; Hailpern, Susan M; Heit, John A; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Judd, Suzanne E; Kissela, Brett M; Kittner, Steven J; Lackland, Daniel T; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Mackey, Rachel H; Magid, David J; Marcus, Gregory M; Marelli, Ariane; Matchar, David B; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Mussolino, Michael E; Neumar, Robert W; Nichol, Graham; Pandey, Dilip K; Paynter, Nina P; Reeves, Matthew J; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Towfighi, Amytis; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Wong, Nathan D; Woo, Daniel; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
    Each year, the American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and other government agencies, brings together the most up-to-date statistics on heart disease, stroke, other vascular diseases, and their risk factors and presents them in its Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update. The Statistical Update is a critical resource for researchers, clinicians, healthcare policy makers, media professionals, the lay public, and many others who seek the best available national data on heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality and the risks, quality of care, use of medical procedures and operations, and costs associated with the management of these diseases in a single document. Indeed, since 1999, the Statistical Update has been cited >10 500 times in the literature, based on citations of all annual versions. In 2012 alone, the various Statistical Updates were cited ≈3500 times (data from Google Scholar). In recent years, the Statistical Update has undergone some major changes with the addition of new chapters and major updates across multiple areas, as well as increasing the number of ways to access and use the information assembled. For this year's edition, the Statistics Committee, which produces the document for the AHA, updated all of the current chapters with the most recent nationally representative data and inclusion of relevant articles from the literature over the past year. This year's edition includes a new chapter on peripheral artery disease, as well as new data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with additional new focus on evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors, implementation strategies, and implications of the AHA's 2020 Impact Goals. Below are a few highlights from this year's Update. © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
    (Circulation, 2014-01) Go, Alan S; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Roger, Véronique L; Benjamin, Emelia J; Berry, Jarett D; Blaha, Michael J; Dai, Shifan; Ford, Earl S; Fox, Caroline S; Franco, Sheila; Fullerton, Heather J; Gillespie, Cathleen; Hailpern, Susan M; Heit, John A; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Judd, Suzanne E; Kissela, Brett M; Kittner, Steven J; Lackland, Daniel T; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Mackey, Rachel H; Magid, David J; Marcus, Gregory M; Marelli, Ariane; Matchar, David B; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Mussolino, Michael E; Neumar, Robert W; Nichol, Graham; Pandey, Dilip K; Paynter, Nina P; Reeves, Matthew J; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Towfighi, Amytis; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Wong, Nathan D; Woo, Daniel; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
    Each year, the American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and other government agencies, brings together the most up-to-date statistics on heart disease, stroke, other vascular diseases, and their risk factors and presents them in its Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update. The Statistical Update is a critical resource for researchers, clinicians, healthcare policy makers, media professionals, the lay public, and many others who seek the best available national data on heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality and the risks, quality of care, use of medical procedures and operations, and costs associated with the management of these diseases in a single document. Indeed, since 1999, the Statistical Update has been cited >10 500 times in the literature, based on citations of all annual versions. In 2012 alone, the various Statistical Updates were cited ≈3500 times (data from Google Scholar). In recent years, the Statistical Update has undergone some major changes with the addition of new chapters and major updates across multiple areas, as well as increasing the number of ways to access and use the information assembled. For this year's edition, the Statistics Committee, which produces the document for the AHA, updated all of the current chapters with the most recent nationally representative data and inclusion of relevant articles from the literature over the past year. This year's edition includes a new chapter on peripheral artery disease, as well as new data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with additional new focus on evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors, implementation strategies, and implications of the AHA's 2020 Impact Goals. Below are a few highlights from this year's Update. © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
    (Circulation, 2015-01) Mozaffarian, Dariush; Benjamin, Emelia J; Go, Alan S; Arnett, Donna K; Blaha, Michael J; Cushman, Mary; de Ferranti, Sarah; Després, Jean-Pierre; Fullerton, Heather J; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Judd, Suzanne E; Kissela, Brett M; Lackland, Daniel T; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Liu, Simin; Mackey, Rachel H; Matchar, David B; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Muntner, Paul; Mussolino, Michael E; Nasir, Khurram; Neumar, Robert W; Nichol, Graham; Palaniappan, Latha; Pandey, Dilip K; Reeves, Mathew J; Rodriguez, Carlos J; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Towfighi, Amytis; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Willey, Joshua Z; Woo, Daniel; Yeh, Robert W; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
    Each year, the American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and other government agencies, brings together the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and presents them in its Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update. The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, clinicians, healthcare administrators, researchers, and others seeking the best available data on these conditions. Together, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke produce immense health and economic burdens in the United States and globally. The Statistical Update brings together in a single document up-to-date information on the core health behaviors and health factors that define cardiovascular health; a range of major clinical disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, and peripheral arterial disease); and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). Since 2009, the annual versions of the Statistical Update have been cited >20 000 times in the literature. In 2014 alone, the various Statistical Updates were cited >5700 times. Each annual version of the Statistical Update undergoes major revisions to include the newest nationally representative data, add additional relevant published scientific findings, remove older information, add new sections or chapters, and increase the number of ways to access and use the assembled information. This year-long process, which begins as soon as the previous Statistical Update is published, is performed by the AHA Statistics Committee faculty volunteers and staff. For example, this year's edition includes a new chapter on cardiac arrest, new data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, additional information in many chapters on the global CVD and stroke burden, and further new focus on evidence- based approaches to changing behaviors, implementation strategies, and implications of the AHA's 2020 Impact Goals. Below are a few highlights from this year's Update.