Browsing by Author "Blasi, Francesco"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access An international perspective on hospitalized patients with viral community-acquired pneumonia.(European journal of internal medicine, 2019-02) Radovanovic, Dejan; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Jankovic, Mateja; Mahesh, Padukudru Anand; Marcos, Pedro Jorge; Abdalla, Mohamed I; Di Pasquale, Marta Francesca; Gramegna, Andrea; Gramegna, Andrea; Terraneo, Silvia; Blasi, Francesco; Santus, Pierachille; Aliberti, Stefano; Reyes, Luis F; Restrepo, Marcos I; GLIMP Study GroupBackground
Who should be tested for viruses in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP), prevalence and risk factors for viral CAP are still debated. We evaluated the frequency of viral testing, virus prevalence, risk factors and treatment coverage with oseltamivir in patients admitted for CAP.Methods
Secondary analysis of GLIMP, an international, multicenter, point-prevalence study of hospitalized adults with CAP. Testing frequency, prevalence of viral CAP and treatment with oseltamivir were assessed among patients who underwent a viral swab. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to evaluate risk factors.Results
553 (14.9%) patients with CAP underwent nasal swab. Viral CAP was diagnosed in 157 (28.4%) patients. Influenza virus was isolated in 80.9% of cases. Testing frequency and viral CAP prevalence were inhomogeneous across the participating centers. Obesity (OR 1.59, 95%CI: 1.01-2.48; p = 0.043) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 1.62, 95%CI: 1.02-2.56; p = 0.040) were independently associated with viral CAP. Prevalence of empirical treatment with oseltamivir was 5.1%.Conclusion
In an international scenario, testing frequency for viruses in CAP is very low. The most common cause of viral CAP is Influenza virus. Obesity and need for invasive ventilation represent independent risk factors for viral CAP. Adherence to recommendations for treatment with oseltamivir is poor.Item Open Access Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Bacterial Lung Infections in Solid Organ Recipients: A Narrative Review.(International journal of molecular sciences, 2020-02) Carugati, Manuela; Morlacchi, Letizia Corinna; Peri, Anna Maria; Alagna, Laura; Rossetti, Valeria; Bandera, Alessandra; Gori, Andrea; Blasi, Francesco; Working Group, IfaltRespiratory infections pose a significant threat to the success of solid organ transplantation, and the diagnosis and management of these infections are challenging. The current narrative review addressed some of these challenges, based on evidence from the literature published in the last 20 years. Specifically, we focused our attention on (i) the obstacles to an etiologic diagnosis of respiratory infections among solid organ transplant recipients, (ii) the management of bacterial respiratory infections in an era characterized by increased antimicrobial resistance, and (iii) the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs dedicated to solid organ transplant recipients.Item Open Access How to choose the duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with pneumonia(Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2015-04) Aliberti, Stefano; Giuliani, Fabio; Ramirez, Julio; Blasi, Francesco; DURATION Study GroupItem Open Access Individualizing duration of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.(Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2017-08) Aliberti, Stefano; Ramirez, Julio; Giuliani, Fabio; Wiemken, Timothy; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Tedeschi, Sara; Carugati, Manuela; Valenti, Vincenzo; Valenti, Vincenzo; Marchioni, Marco; Camera, Marco; Piro, Roberto; Del Forno, Manuela; Milani, Giuseppe; Faverio, Paola; Richeldi, Luca; Deotto, Martina; Villani, Massimiliano; Voza, Antonio; Tobaldini, Eleonora; Bernardi, Mauro; Bellone, Andrea; Bassetti, Matteo; Blasi, FrancescoInternational experts suggest tailoring antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to patients' characteristics. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an individualized approach to antibiotic duration based on time in which CAP patients reach clinical stability during hospitalization. In a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial hospitalized adult patients with CAP reaching clinical stability within 5 days after hospitalization were randomized to a standard vs. individualized antibiotic duration. In the Individualized group, antibiotics were discontinued 48 h after the patient reached clinical stability, with at least five days of total antibiotic treatment. Early failure within 30 days was the primary composite outcome. 135 patients were randomized to the Standard group and 125 to the Individualized group. The trial was interrupted by the safety committee because of an apparent inferiority of the Individualized group over the Standard treatment: 14 (11.2%) patients in the Individualized group experienced early failure vs. 10 (7.4%) patients in the Standard group, p = 0.200, at the intention-to-treat analysis. 30-day mortality rate was four-time higher in the Individualized group than the Standard group. Shortening antibiotic duration according to patients' characteristics still remains an open question.Item Open Access Management of Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.(Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-01) Vanoni, Nicolò Maria; Carugati, Manuela; Borsa, Noemi; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Saderi, Laura; Gori, Andrea; Mantero, Marco; Aliberti, Stefano; Blasi, FrancescoCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. CAP mortality is driven by the development of sepsis and acute respiratory failure (ARF). We performed a systematic review of the available English literature published in the period 1 January 1997 to 31 August 2017 and focused on ARF in CAP. The database searches identified 189 articles-of these, only 29 were retained for data extraction. Of these 29 articles, 12 addressed ARF in CAP without discussing its ventilatory management, while 17 evaluated the ventilatory management of ARF in CAP. In the studies assessing the ventilatory management, the specific treatments addressed were: high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (n = 1), continuous positive airway pressure (n = 2), non-invasive ventilation (n = 9), and invasive mechanical ventilation (n = 5). When analyzed, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) success rates ranged from 20% to 76% and they strongly predicted survival, while NIV failure led to an increased risk of adverse outcome. In conclusion, ARF in CAP patients may require both ventilatory and non-ventilatory management. Further research is needed to better evaluate the use of NIV and HFNC in those patients. Alongside the prompt administration of antimicrobials, the potential use of steroids and the implementation of severity scores should also be considered.Item Open Access Microbiological testing of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: an international study.(ERJ open research, 2018-10) Carugati, Manuela; Aliberti, Stefano; Reyes, Luis Felipe; Franco Sadud, Ricardo; Irfan, Muhammad; Prat, Cristina; Soni, Nilam J; Faverio, Paola; Gori, Andrea; Blasi, Francesco; Restrepo, Marcos IThis study aimed to describe real-life microbiological testing of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and to assess concordance with the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) and 2011 European Respiratory Society (ERS) CAP guidelines. This was a cohort study based on the Global Initiative for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia (GLIMP) database, which contains point-prevalence data on adults hospitalised with CAP across 54 countries during 2015. In total, 3702 patients were included. Testing was performed in 3217 patients, and included blood culture (71.1%), sputum culture (61.8%), Legionella urinary antigen test (30.1%), pneumococcal urinary antigen test (30.0%), viral testing (14.9%), acute-phase serology (8.8%), bronchoalveolar lavage culture (8.4%) and pleural fluid culture (3.2%). A pathogen was detected in 1173 (36.5%) patients. Testing attitudes varied significantly according to geography and disease severity. Testing was concordant with IDSA/ATS and ERS guidelines in 16.7% and 23.9% of patients, respectively. IDSA/ATS concordance was higher in Europe than in North America (21.5% versus 9.8%; p<0.01), while ERS concordance was higher in North America than in Europe (33.5% versus 19.5%; p<0.01). Testing practices of adults hospitalised with CAP varied significantly by geography and disease severity. There was a wide discordance between real-life testing practices and IDSA/ATS/ERS guideline recommendations.Item Open Access Prevalence and Etiology of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients.(Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019-04) Di Pasquale, Marta Francesca; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Gramegna, Andrea; Gramegna, Andrea; Radovanovic, Dejan; Terraneo, Silvia; Reyes, Luis F; Rupp, Jan; González Del Castillo, Juan; Blasi, Francesco; Aliberti, Stefano; Restrepo, Marcos I; GLIMP InvestigatorsBackground
The correct management of immunocompromised patients with pneumonia is debated. We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, and characteristics of immunocompromised patients coming from the community with pneumonia.Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of an international, multicenter study enrolling adult patients coming from the community with pneumonia and hospitalized in 222 hospitals in 54 countries worldwide. Risk factors for immunocompromise included AIDS, aplastic anemia, asplenia, hematological cancer, chemotherapy, neutropenia, biological drug use, lung transplantation, chronic steroid use, and solid tumor.Results
At least 1 risk factor for immunocompromise was recorded in 18% of the 3702 patients enrolled. The prevalences of risk factors significantly differed across continents and countries, with chronic steroid use (45%), hematological cancer (25%), and chemotherapy (22%) the most common. Among immunocompromised patients, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens were the most frequently identified, and prevalences did not differ from those in immunocompetent patients. Risk factors for immunocompromise were independently associated with neither Pseudomonas aeruginosa nor non-community-acquired bacteria. Specific risk factors were independently associated with fungal infections (odds ratio for AIDS and hematological cancer, 15.10 and 4.65, respectively; both P = .001), mycobacterial infections (AIDS; P = .006), and viral infections other than influenza (hematological cancer, 5.49; P < .001).Conclusions
Our findings could be considered by clinicians in prescribing empiric antibiotic therapy for CAP in immunocompromised patients. Patients with AIDS and hematological cancer admitted with CAP may have higher prevalences of fungi, mycobacteria, and noninfluenza viruses.