Browsing by Author "Boelens, Jaap J"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Allele-level HLA matching for umbilical cord blood transplantation for non-malignant diseases in children: a retrospective analysis.
    (The Lancet. Haematology, 2017-07) Eapen, Mary; Wang, Tao; Veys, Paul A; Boelens, Jaap J; St Martin, Andrew; Spellman, Stephen; Bonfim, Carmem Sales; Brady, Colleen; Cant, Andrew J; Dalle, Jean-Hugues; Davies, Stella M; Freeman, John; Hsu, Katherine C; Fleischhauer, Katharina; Kenzey, Chantal; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Michel, Gerard; Orchard, Paul J; Paviglianiti, Annalisa; Rocha, Vanderson; Veneris, Michael R; Volt, Fernanda; Wynn, Robert; Lee, Stephanie J; Horowitz, Mary M; Gluckman, Eliane; Ruggeri, Annalisa

    Background

    The standard for selecting unrelated umbilical cord blood units for transplantation for non-malignant diseases relies on antigen-level (lower resolution) HLA typing for HLA-A and HLA-B, and allele-level for HLA-DRB1. We aimed to study the effects of allele-level matching at a higher resolution-HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1, which is the standard used for adult unrelated volunteer donor transplantation for non-malignant diseases-for umbilical cord blood transplantation.

    Methods

    We retrospectively studied 1199 paediatric donor-recipient pairs with allele-level HLA matching who received a single unit umbilical cord blood transplantation for non-malignant diseases reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research or Eurocord and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Transplantations occurred between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2012. The primary outcome was overall survival. The effect of HLA matching on survival was studied using a Cox regression model.

    Findings

    Compared with HLA-matched transplantations, mortality was higher with transplantations mismatched at two (hazard ratio [HR] 1·55, 95% CI 1·08-2·21, p=0·018), three (2·04, 1·44-2·89, p=0·0001), and four or more alleles (3·15, 2·16-4·58, p<0·0001). There were no significant differences in mortality between transplantations that were matched and mismatched at one allele (HR 1·18, 95% CI 0·80-1·72, p=0·39). Other factors associated with higher mortality included recipient cytomegalovirus seropositivity (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·13-1·74, p=0·0020), reduced intensity compared with myeloablative conditioning regimens (HR 1·36, 1·10-1·68, p=0·0041), transplantation of units with total nucleated cell dose of more than 21 × 107 cells per kg compared with 21 × 107 cells per kg or less (HR 1·47, 1·11-1·95, p=0·0076), and transplantations done in 2000-05 compared with those done in 2006-12 (HR 1·64, 1·31-2·04, p<0·0001). The 5-year overall survival adjusted for recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus, conditioning regimen intensity, total nucleated cell dose, and transplantation period was 79% (95% CI 74-85) after HLA matched, 76% (71-81) after one allele mismatched, 70% (65-75) after two alleles mismatched, 62% (57-68) after three alleles mismatched, and 49% (41-57) after four or more alleles mismatched transplantations. Graft failure was the predominant cause of mortality.

    Interpretation

    These data support a change from current practice in that selection of unrelated umbilical cord blood units for transplantation for non-malignant diseases should consider allele-level HLA matching at HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1.

    Funding

    National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases; US Department of Health and Human Services-Health Resources and Services Administration; and US Department of Navy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
    (Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021-08) Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A; Kumar, Ambuj; Ayala, Ernesto; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Nishihori, Taiga; Marsh, Rebecca; Burroughs, Lauri M; Majhail, Navneet; Al-Homsi, A Samer; Al-Kadhimi, Zaid S; Bar, Merav; Bertaina, Alice; Boelens, Jaap J; Champlin, Richard; Chaudhury, Sonali; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai; El-Jawahri, Areej; Fanning, Suzanne; Fraint, Ellen; Gergis, Usama; Giralt, Sergio; Hamilton, Betty K; Hashmi, Shahrukh K; Horn, Biljana; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Jacobsohn, David A; Jain, Tania; Johnston, Laura; Kanate, Abraham S; Kansagra, Ankit; Kassim, Adetola; Kean, Leslie S; Kitko, Carrie L; Knight-Perry, Jessica; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Liu, Hien; MacMillan, Margaret L; Mahmoudjafari, Zahra; Mielcarek, Marco; Mohty, Mohamad; Nagler, Arnon; Nemecek, Eneida; Olson, Timothy S; Oran, Betul; Perales, Miguel-Angel; Prockop, Susan E; Pulsipher, Michael A; Pusic, Iskra; Riches, Marcie L; Rodriguez, Cesar; Romee, Rizwan; Rondon, Gabriela; Saad, Ayman; Shah, Nina; Shaw, Peter J; Shenoy, Shalini; Sierra, Jorge; Talano, Julie; Verneris, Michael R; Veys, Paul; Wagner, John E; Savani, Bipin N; Hamadani, Mehdi; Carpenter, Paul A
    Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for certain hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. The field of allo-HCT has witnessed significant advances, including broadening indications for transplantation, availability of alternative donor sources, less toxic preparative regimens, new cell manipulation techniques, and novel GVHD prevention methods, all of which have expanded the applicability of the procedure. These advances have led to clinical practice conundrums when applying traditional definitions of hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, because these may vary based on donor type, cell source, cell dose, primary disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and conditioning intensity, among other variables. To address these contemporary challenges, we surveyed a panel of allo-HCT experts in an attempt to standardize these definitions. We analyzed survey responses from adult and pediatric transplantation physicians separately. Consensus was achieved for definitions of neutrophil and platelet recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, but not for delayed engraftment. Here we highlight the complexities associated with the management of mixed donor chimerism in malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases, which remains an area for future research. We recognize that there are multiple other specific, and at times complex, clinical scenarios for which clinical management must be individualized.