Browsing by Author "Buggey, Jonathan"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Amiodarone-Induced Liver Injury and Cirrhosis.
    (ACG Case Rep J, 2015-01) Buggey, Jonathan; Kappus, Matthew; Lagoo, Anand S; Brady, Carla W
    We present a case report of an 80-year-old woman with volume overload thought initially to be secondary to heart failure, but determined to be amiodarone-induced acute and chronic liver injury leading to submassive necrosis and bridging fibrosis consistent with early cirrhosis. Her histopathology was uniquely absent of steatosis and phospholipidosis, which are commonly seen in AIC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition in heart failure: mechanistic action and clinical impact.
    (J Card Fail, 2015-09) Buggey, Jonathan; Mentz, Robert J; DeVore, Adam D; Velazquez, Eric J
    Heart failure (HF) is an increasingly common syndrome associated with high mortality and economic burden, and there has been a paucity over the past decade of new pharmacotherapies that improve outcomes. However, recent data from a large randomized controlled trial compared the novel agent LCZ696, a dual-acting angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), with the well established angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril and found significant reduction in mortality among the chronic reduced ejection fraction HF population. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that neprilysin inhibition provides beneficial outcomes in HF patients by preventing the degradation of natriuretic peptides and thereby promoting natriuresis and vasodilatation and counteracting the negative cardiorenal effects of the up-regulated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Agents such as omapatrilat combined neprilysin and ACE inhibition but had increased rates of angioedema. Goals of an improved safety profile provided the rationale for the development of the ARNi LCZ696. Along with significant reductions in mortality and hospitalizations, clinical trials suggest that LCZ696 may improve surrogate markers of HF severity. In this paper, we review the preclinical and clinical data that led to the development of LCZ696, the understanding of the underlying mechanistic action, and the robust clinical impact that LCZ696 may have in the near future.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Torsemide versus furosemide in heart failure patients: insights from Duke University Hospital.
    (J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2015-05) Mentz, Robert J; Buggey, Jonathan; Fiuzat, Mona; Ersbøll, Mads K; Schulte, Phillip J; DeVore, Adam D; Eisenstein, Eric L; Anstrom, Kevin J; OʼConnor, Christopher M; Velazquez, Eric J
    Furosemide has historically been the primary loop diuretic in heart failure patients despite data suggesting potential advantages with torsemide. We used the Duke Echocardiography Lab Database to investigate patients admitted with heart failure to Duke Hospital from 2000 to 2010 who were discharged on either torsemide or furosemide. We described baseline characteristics based on discharge diuretic and assessed the relationship with all-cause mortality through 5 years. Of 4580 patients, 86% (n = 3955) received furosemide and 14% (n = 625) received torsemide. Patients receiving torsemide were more likely to be female and had more comorbidities compared with furosemide-treated patients. Survival was worse in torsemide-treated patients [5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival of 41.4% (95% CI: 36.7-46.0) vs. 51.5% (95% CI: 49.8-53.1)]. After risk adjustment, torsemide use was no longer associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.16; 95% CI: 0.98-1.38; P = 0.0864). Prospective trials are needed to investigate the effect of torsemide versus furosemide because of the potential for residual confounding.