Browsing by Author "Campbell, LM"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Are we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles?
    (Endangered Species Research, 2016-12-30) Rees, AF; Alfaro-Shigueto, J; Barata, PCR; Bjorndal, KA; Bolten, AB; Bourjea, J; Broderick, AC; Campbell, LM; Cardona, L; Carreras, C; Casale, P; Ceriani, SA; Dutton, PH; Eguchi, T; Formia, A; Fuentes, MMPB; Fuller, WJ; Girondot, M; Godfrey, MH; Hamann, M; Hart, KM; Hays, GC; Hochscheid, S; Kaska, Y; Jensen, MP; Mangel, JC; Mortimer, JA; Naro-Maciel, E; Ng, CKY; Nichols, WJ; Phillott, AD; Reina, RD; Revuelta, O; Schofield, G; Seminoff, JA; Shanker, K; Tomás, J; van de Merwe, JP; Van Houtan, KS; Vander Zanden, HB; Wallace, BP; Wedemeyer-Strombel, KR; Work, TM; Godley, BJ
    © The authors 2016. In 2010, an international group of 35 sea turtle researchers refined an initial list of more than 200 research questions into 20 metaquestions that were considered key for management and conservation of sea turtles. These were classified under 5 categories: reproductive biology, biogeography, population ecology, threats and conservation strategies. To obtain a picture of how research is being focused towards these key questions, we undertook a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature (2014 and 2015) attributing papers to the original 20 questions. In total, we reviewed 605 articles in full and from these 355 (59%) were judged to substantively address the 20 key questions, with others focusing on basic science and monitoring. Progress to answering the 20 questions was not uniform, and there were biases regarding focal turtle species, geographic scope and publication outlet. Whilst it offers some meaningful indications as to effort, quantifying peer-reviewed literature output is ob viously not the only, and possibly not the best, metric for understanding progress towards informing key conservation and management goals. Along with the literature review, an international group based on the original project consortium was assigned to critically summarise recent progress towards answering each of the 20 questions. We found that significant research is being expended towards global priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles. Although highly variable, there has been significant progress in all the key questions identified in 2010. Undertaking this critical review has highlighted that it may be timely to undertake one or more new prioritizing exercises. For this to have maximal benefit we make a range of recommendations for its execution. These include a far greater engagement with social sciences, widening the pool of contributors and focussing the questions, perhaps disaggregating ecology and conservation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century
    (Endangered Species Research, 2010-05-26) Hamann, M; Godfrey, MH; Seminoff, JA; Arthur, K; Barata, PCR; Bjorndal, KA; Bolten, AB; Broderick, AC; Campbell, LM; Carreras, C; Casale, P; Chaloupka, M; Chan, SKF; Coyne, MS; Crowder, LB; Diez, CE; Dutton, PH; Epperly, SP; FitzSimmons, NN; Formia, A; Girondot, M; Hays, GC; I Jiunn, C; Kaska, Y; Lewison, R; Mortimer, JA; Nichols, WJ; Reina, RD; Shanker, K; Spotila, JR; Tomás, J; Wallace, BP; Work, TM; Zbinden, J; Godley, BJ
    Over the past 3 decades, the status of sea turtles and the need for their protection to aid population recovery have increasingly captured the interest of government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the general public worldwide. This interest has been matched by increased research attention, focusing on a wide variety of topics relating to sea turtle biology and ecology, together with the interrelations of sea turtles with the physical and natural environments. Although sea turtles have been better studied than most other marine fauna, management actions and their evaluation are often hindered by the lack of data on turtle biology, human-turtle interactions, turtle population status and threats. In an effort to inform effective sea turtle conservation a list of priority research questions was assembled based on the opinions of 35 sea turtle researchers from 13 nations working in fields related to turtle biology and/or conservation. The combined experience of the contributing researchers spanned the globe as well as many relevant disciplines involved in conservation research. An initial list of more than 200 questions gathered from respondents was condensed into 20 metaquestions and classified under 5 categories: reproductive biology, biogeography, population ecology, threats and conservation strategies. © Inter-Research 2010.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Human dimensions of bycatch reduction technology: Current assumptions and directions for future research
    (Endangered Species Research, 2008-12-01) Campbell, LM; Cornwell, ML
    Bycatch reduction technology (BRT) modifies fishing gear to increase selectivity and avoid capture of non-target species, or to facilitate their non-lethal release. As a solution to fisheries-related mortality of non-target species, BRT is an attractive option; effectively implemented, BRT presents a technical 'fix' that can reduce pressure for politically contentious and economically detrimental interventions, such as fisheries closures. While a number of factors might contribute to effective implementation, our review of BRT literature finds that research has focused on technical design and experimental performance of individual technologies. In contrast, and with a few notable exceptions, research on the human and institutional context of BRT, and more specifically on how fishers respond to BRT, is limited. This is not to say that fisher attitudes are ignored or overlooked, but that incentives for fisher uptake of BRT are usually assumed rather than assessed or demonstrated. Three assumptions about fisher incentives dominate: (1) economic incentives will generate acceptance of BRT; (2) enforcement will generate compliance with BRT; and (3) 'participation' by fishers will increase acceptance and compliance, and overall support for BRT. In this paper, we explore evidence for and against these assumptions and situate our analysis in the wider social science literature on fisheries. Our goal is to highlight the need and suggest focal areas for further research. © Inter-Research 2008.