Browsing by Author "Chou, Dean"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 75
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A Multicenter Study of the Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes of Cervical Dural Tears.(Global spine journal, 2017-04) O'Neill, Kevin R; Fehlings, Michael G; Mroz, Thomas E; Smith, Zachary A; Hsu, Wellington K; Kanter, Adam S; Steinmetz, Michael P; Arnold, Paul M; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Chou, Dean; Nassr, Ahmad; Qureshi, Sheeraz A; Cho, Samuel K; Baird, Evan O; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Tannoury, Chadi A; Tannoury, Tony; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hart, Robert A; Isaacs, Robert E; Sasso, Rick C; Bumpass, David B; Bydon, Mohamad; Corriveau, Mark; De Giacomo, Anthony F; Derakhshan, Adeeb; Jobse, Bruce C; Lubelski, Daniel; Lee, Sungho; Massicotte, Eric M; Pace, Jonathan R; Smith, Gabriel A; Than, Khoi D; Riew, K DanielStudy design
Retrospective multicenter case series study.Objective
Because cervical dural tears are rare, most surgeons have limited experience with this complication. A multicenter study was performed to better understand the presentation, treatment, and outcomes following cervical dural tears.Methods
Multiple surgeons from 23 institutions retrospectively identified 21 rare complications that occurred between 2005 and 2011, including unintentional cervical dural tears. Demographic data and surgical history were obtained. Clinical outcomes following surgery were assessed, and any reoperations were recorded. Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), Nurick classification (NuC), and Short-Form 36 (SF36) scores were recorded at baseline and final follow-up at certain centers. All data were collected, collated, and analyzed by a private research organization.Results
There were 109 cases of cervical dural tears among 18 463 surgeries performed. In 101 cases (93%) there was no clinical sequelae following successful dural tear repair. There were statistical improvements (P < .05) in mJOA and NuC scores, but not NDI or SF36 scores. No specific baseline or operative factors were found to be associated with the occurrence of dural tears. In most cases, no further postoperative treatments of the dural tear were required, while there were 13 patients (12%) that required subsequent treatment of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Analysis of those requiring further treatments did not identify an optimum treatment strategy for cervical dural tears.Conclusions
In this multicenter study, we report our findings on the largest reported series (n = 109) of cervical dural tears. In a vast majority of cases, no subsequent interventions were required and no clinical sequelae were observed.Item Open Access A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.(Spine, 2010-10) Fisher, Charles G; DiPaola, Christian P; Ryken, Timothy C; Bilsky, Mark H; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Berven, Sigurd H; Harrop, James S; Fehlings, Michael G; Boriani, Stefano; Chou, Dean; Schmidt, Meic H; Polly, David W; Biagini, Roberto; Burch, Shane; Dekutoski, Mark B; Ganju, Aruna; Gerszten, Peter C; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Groff, Michael W; Liebsch, Norbert J; Mendel, Ehud; Okuno, Scott H; Patel, Shreyaskumar; Rhines, Laurence D; Rose, Peter S; Sciubba, Daniel M; Sundaresan, Narayan; Tomita, Katsuro; Varga, Peter P; Vialle, Luiz R; Vrionis, Frank D; Yamada, Yoshiya; Fourney, Daryl RStudy design
Systematic review and modified Delphi technique.Objective
To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability.Summary of background data
Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors.Methods
We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability.Results
A comprehensive classification system based on patient symptoms and radiographic criteria of the spine was developed to aid in predicting spine stability of neoplastic lesions. The classification system includes global spinal location of the tumor, type and presence of pain, bone lesion quality, spinal alignment, extent of vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral spinal element involvement. Qualitative scores were assigned based on relative importance of particular factors gleaned from the literature and refined by expert consensus.Conclusion
The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score is a comprehensive classification system with content validity that can guide clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine may benefit from surgical consultation. It can also aid surgeons in assessing the key components of spinal instability due to neoplasia and may become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making when put in context with other key elements such as neurologic symptoms, extent of disease, prognosis, patient health factors, oncologic subtype, and radiosensitivity of the tumor.Item Open Access Are Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons or Classical Open Spine Surgeons More Consistent with Their Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?(World neurosurgery, 2022-09) Uribe, Juan S; Koffie, Robert M; Wang, Michael Y; Mundis, Gregory M; Kanter, Adam S; Eastlack, Robert K; Anand, Neel; Park, Paul; Smith, Justin S; Burton, Douglas C; Chou, Dean; Kelly, Michael P; Kim, Han Jo; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
Spine surgeons have a heuristic sense of how to surgically restore alignment and address adult spinal deformity (ASD) symptoms, but consensus on the extent of treatment remains unclear. We sought to determine the variability of surgical approaches in treating ASD.Methods
Sixteen spine surgeons were surveyed on treatment approaches in 10 select ASD cases. We repeated the survey with the same surgeons 4 weeks later, with cases ordered differently. We examined the variability in length of construct, use of interbody spacers, osteotomies, and pelvic fixation frequency.Results
Treatment approaches for each case varied by surgeon, with some surgeons opting for long fusion constructs in cases for which others offered no surgery. There was no consensus among surgeons on the number of levels fused, interbody spacer use, or anterior/posterior osteotomies. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability was 48% (kappa = 0.31) and 59% (kappa = 0.44) for surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 37% (kappa = 0.21) and 47% (kappa = 0.30) for those performing open surgery. In the second-round survey, 8 of 15 (53%) surgeons substantially changed the construct length, number of interbody spacers, and osteotomies in at least half the cases they previously reviewed. Surgeons performing MIS versus open surgery were less likely to extend constructs to the pelvis (42.5% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.02), but construct length was not correlated with whether a surgeon performed MIS or open surgery.Conclusions
Spinal deformity surgeons lack consensus on the optimal surgical approach for treating ASD. Classifying surgeons as performing MIS or open surgery does not mitigate this variability.Item Open Access Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery?(World neurosurgery, 2016-02) Park, Paul; Okonkwo, David O; Nguyen, Stacie; Mundis, Gregory M; Than, Khoi D; Deviren, Vedat; La Marca, Frank; Fu, Kai-Ming; Wang, Michael Y; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard; Nunley, Pierce D; Chou, Dean; Kanter, Adam S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Passias, Peter G; Eastlack, Robert K; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study GroupBackground
Older age has been considered a relative contraindication to complex spinal procedures. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques to treat patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) have emerged with the potential benefit of decreased approach-related morbidity.Objective
To determine whether a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) could be achieved in patients ages ≥ 65 years with ASD who underwent MIS.Methods
Multicenter database of patients who underwent MIS for ASD was queried. Outcome metrics assessed were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. On the basis of published reports, MCID was defined as a positive change of 12.8 ODI, 1.2 VAS back pain, and 1.6 VAS leg pain.Results
Forty-two patients were identified. Mean age was 70.3 years; 31 (73.8%) were women. Preoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis were 35°, 24.6°, 14.2°, and 4.7 cm, respectively. Postoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were 18°, 25.4°, 11.9°, and 4.9 cm, respectively. A mean of 5.0 levels was treated posteriorly, and a mean of 4.0 interbody fusions was performed. Mean ODI improved from 47.1 to 25.1. Mean VAS back and leg pain scores improved from 6.8 and 5.9 to 2.7 and 2.7, respectively. Mean follow-up was 32.1 months. For ODI, 64.3% of patients achieved MCID. For VAS back and leg pain, 82.9% and 72.2%, respectively, reached MCID.Conclusions
MCID represents the threshold at which patients feel a meaningful clinical improvement has occurred. Our study results suggest that the majority of elderly patients with modest ASD can achieve MCID with MIS.Item Open Access Canadian Spine Society: 23rd Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, March 1 - Saturday, March 4, Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Québec, Que., Canada.(Can J Surg, 2023) Birk, Manjot; Sidhu, Kara; Filezio, Marina Rosa; Singh, Vishwajeet; Ferri-de-Barros, Fabio; Chan, Vivien; Shumilak, Geoffrey; Nataraj, Andrew; Langston, Holly; Yee, Nicholas J; Iorio, Carlo; Shkumat, Nicholas; Rocos, Brett; Ertl-Wagner, Birgit; Lebel, David; Camp, Mark W; Dimentberg, Evan; Saran, Neil; Laflamme, Melissa; Ouellet, Jean A; Wenghofer, Jessica; Livock, Holly; Beaton, Luke; Tice, Andrew; Smit, Kevin; Graham, Ryan; Duarte, Matias Pereira; Roy-Beaudry, Marjolaine; Turgeon, Isabelle; Joncas, Julie; Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc; Labelle, Hubert; Barchi, Soraya; Parent, Stefan; Gholamian, Tara; Livock, Holly; Tice, Andrew; Smit, Kevin; Yoon, Samuel; Zulfiqar, Amna; Rocos, Brett; Murphy, Anne; Bath, Natasha; Moll, Stanley; Sorbara, Julia; Lebel, David; Camp, Mark W; Nallet, Jérémie Arthur; Rocos, Brett; Lebel, David Eduard; Zeller, Reinhard; Dermott, Jennifer A; Kim, Dorothy J; Anthony, Alison; Zeller, Reinhard; Lebel, David E; Wang, Zhi; Shen, Jesse; Kamel, Youssef; Liu, Jia; Shedid, Daniel; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Boubez, Ghassan; Rizkallah, Maroun; Rizkallah, Maroun; Shen, Jesse; Boubez, Ghassan; Kamel, Youssef; Liu, Jia; Shedid, Daniel; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Lavoie, Frederic; Yug, Sung-Joo; Wang, Zhi; Alavi, Fatemeh; Nielsen, Christopher; Rampersaud, Raja; Lewis, Stephen; Cheung, Angela M; Cadieux, Chloe; Fernandes, Renan; Brzozowski, Pawel; Zdero, Radovan; Bailey, Chris; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Cherry, Ahmed; Manoharan, Ragavan; Xu, Mark; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Iorio, Carlo; Raj, Aditya; Nielsen, Christopher; Rampersaud, Raja; Lewis, Stephen; Beange, Kristen; Graham, Ryan; Livock, Holly; Smit, Kevin; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Raj, Aditya; Xu, Mark; Iorio, Carlo; Nielsen, Christopher J; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Lewis, Stephen J; Nasrabadi, Ali Asghar Mohammadi; Moammer, Gemah; Phee, John Mc; Walker, Taryn; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris S; Herrington, Brandon J; Fernandes, Renan R; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Siddiqi, Fawaz; Bailey, Christopher S; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan R; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris S; Yang, Michael MH; Riva-Cambrin, Jay; Cunningham, Jonathan; Casha, Steven; Cadieux, Chloe N; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan; Glennie, Andrew; Fisher, Charles; Rampersaud, Raja; Xu, Mark; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditya; Srikandarajah, Nish; Iorio, Carlo; Nielsen, Christopher; Lewis, Stephen; Rampersaud, Raja; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditya; McIntosh, Greg; Manoharan, Ragavan; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Nielsen, Christopher; Xu, Mark; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Iorio, Carlo; Perruccio, Anthony; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Raja; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Richardson, Eden; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Attabib, Najmedden; Small, Chris; Kolyvas, George; LeRoux, Andre; Outcomes, Canadian Spine; Investigators, Research Network; Hebert, Jeff; Baisamy, Victor; Rizkallah, Maroun; Shen, Jesse; Cresson, Thierry; Vazquez, Carlos; Wang, Zhi; Boubez, Ghassan; Lung, Tiffany; Canizares, Mayilee; Perruccio, Anthony; Rampersaud, Raja; Crawford, Eric J; Ravinsky, Robert A; Perruccio, Anthony V; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Coyte, Peter C; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Bartolozzi, Arthur R; Barzilai, Ori; Chou, Dean; Laufer, Ilya; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Sahgal, Arjun; Rhines, Laurence D; Scuibba, Daniel M; Lazary, Aron; Weber, Michael H; Schuster, James M; Boriani, Stefano; Bettegowda, Chetan; Arnold, Paul M; Clarke, Michelle J; Fehlings, Michael G; Reynolds, Jeremy J; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Fisher, Charles G; Dea, Nicolas; Versteeg, Anne L; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Laufer, Ilya; Teixeira, William; Barzilai, Ori; Gasbarrini, Alessandro; Fehlings, Michael G; Chou, Dean; Johnson, Michael G; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Dea, Nicolas; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Goldschlager, Tony; Shin, John H; O'Toole, John E; Sciubba, Daniel M; Bettegowda, Chetan; Clarke, Michelle J; Weber, Michael H; Mesfin, Addisu; Kawahara, Norio; Goodwin, Rory; Disch, Alexander; Lazary, Aron; Boriani, Stefano; Sahgal, Arjun; Rhines, Laurence; Fisher, Charles G; Versteeg, Anne L; Gal, Roxanne; Reich, Leilani; Tsang, Angela; Aludino, Allan; Sahgal, Arjun; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Fisher, Charles G; Verkooijen, Lenny; Rizkallah, Maroun; Wang, Zhi; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Shedid, Daniel; Shen, Jesse; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Belguendouz, Céline; AlKafi, Rayan; Boubez, Ghassan; MacLean, Mark A; Georgiopoulos, Miltiadis; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Germscheid, Niccole; Goodwin, C Rory; Weber, Michael; International, Ao Spine; Rizkallah, Maroun; Boubez, Ghassan; Zhang, Hao; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Brindamour, Pamela; Boule, Danielle; Shen, Jesse; Shedid, Daniel; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Wang, Zhi; Correale, Marcia Rebecca; Soever, Leslie Jayne; Rampersaud, Raja; Malic, Claudia Cristina; Dubreuil, Melanie; Duke, Kate; Kingwell, Stephen P; Lin, Zihan; MacLean, Mark A; Julien, Lisa C; Patriquin, Glenn; LeBlanc, Jason; Green, Ryan; Alant, Jacob; Barry, Sean; Glennie, R Andrew; Oxney, William; Christie, Sean D; Sarraj, Mohamed; Alqahtani, Abdullah; Thornley, Patrick; Koziarz, Frank; Bailey, Christopher S; Freire-Archer, Millaray; Bhanot, Kunal; Kachur, Edward; Bhandari, Mohit; Oitment, Colby; Malhotra, Armaan K; Balas, Michael; Jaja, Blessing NR; Harrington, Erin M; Hofereiter, Johann; Jaffe, Rachael H; He, Yingshi; Byrne, James P; Wilson, Jefferson R; Witiw, Christopher D; Brittain, Kennedy CM; Christie, Sean; Pillai, Saranyan; Dvorak, Marcel F; Evaniew, Nathan; Chen, Melody; Waheed, Zeina; Rotem-Kohavi, Naama; Fallah, Nader; Noonan, Vanessa K; Fisher, Charles G; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Dea, Nicolas; Ailon, Tamir; Street, John; Kwon, Brian K; Sandarage, Ryan V; Galuta, Ahmad; Ghinda, Diana; Kwan, Jason CS; TsaI, Eve C; Hachem, Laureen D; Hong, James; Velumian, Alexander; Mothe, Andrea J; Tator, Charles H; Fehlings, Michael G; Shakil, Husain; Jaja, Blessing NR; Zhang, Peng; Jaffe, Rachael; Malhotra, Armaan K; Wilson, Jefferson R; Witiw, Christopher D; Rotem-Kohavi, Naama; Dvorak, Marcel F; Dea, Nicolas; Evaniew, Nathan; Chen, Melody; Waheed, Zeina; Xu, Jijie; Fallah, Nader; Noonan, Vanessa; Kwon, Brian; Dandurand, Charlotte; Muijs, Sander; Dvorak, Marcel; Schnake, Klaus; Cumhur; Ouml Ner; Greene, Ryan; Furlong, Bradley; Smith-Forrester, Jenna; Swab, Michelle; Christie, Sean D; Hall, Amanda; Leck, Erika; Marshall, Emily; Christie, Sean; Dvorak, Marcel F; Cumhur, F; Ouml Ner; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Benneker, Lorin M; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; El-Sharkawi, Mohammad; Popescu, Eugen Cezar; Tee, Jin Wee; Paquet, Jerome; France, John C; Allen, Richard; Lavelle, William F; Hirschfeld, Miguel; Pneumaticos, Spyros; Dandurand, Charlotte; Cumhur; Ouml Ner; Muijs, Sander; Schnake, Klaus; Dvorak, Marcel; Fernandes, Renan Rodrigues; Thornley, Patrick; Urquhart, Jennifer; Kelly, Sean; Alenezi, Nasser; Alahmari, Abdulmajeed; Siddiqi, Fawaz; Singh, Supriya; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Bailey, Christopher; Evaniew, Nathan; Burger, Lukas D; Dea, Nicolas; Cadotte, David W; McIntosh, Greg; Jacobs, Bradley; St-Laurent-Lebeux, Loïc; Bourassa-Moreau, Étienne; Sarraj, Mohamed; Majeed, Meerab; Guha, Daipayan; Pahuta, Markian; Laflamme, Mathieu; McIntosh, Greg; Dea, Nicolas; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Silva, Yan Gabriel Morais David; Goulet, Julien; McIntosh, Greg; Bedard, Sonia; Pimenta, Newton; Blanchard, Jocelyn; Couture, Jerome; LaRue, Bernard; Investigators, Csorn; Adams, Tyler; Cunningham, Erin; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Vandewint, Amanda; Manson, Niel; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Hebert, Jeffery; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Hillier, Troy; Bailey, Chris S; Fisher, Charles; Rampersaud, Raja; Koto, Prosper; Glennie, R Andrew; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Lewkonia, Peter; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Ben-Israel, David; Crawford, Eric J; Fisher, Charles; Dea, Nicolas; Spackman, Eldon; Rampersaud, Raja; Thomas, Kenneth C; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Nielsen, Christopher; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditiya; Xu, Mark; Iorio, Carlo; Bailey, Chris; Dea, Nicolas; Fisher, Charles; Hall, Hamilton; Manson, Neil; Thomas, Kenneth; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan R; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris; Yang, Michael MH; Far, Rena; Sajobi, Tolulope; Riva-Cambrin, Jay; Casha, Steven; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Silva, Yan; Pimenta, Newton Godoy; LaRue, Bernard; Bedard, Sonia; Oviedo, Sonia Cheng; Goulet, Julien; Couture, Jerome; Blanchard, Jocelyn; McDonald, James; Al-Jahdali, Fares; Urquhart, Jennifer; Alahmari, Abdulmajeed; Rampersaud, Raja; Fisher, Charles; Bailey, Chris; Glennie, Andrew; Evaniew, Nathan; Coyle, Matthew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Bailey, Christopher S; Jacobs, W Bradley; Cadotte, David W; Thomas, Kenneth C; Attabib, Najmedden; Paquet, Jérôme; Nataraj, Andrew; Christie, Sean D; Weber, Michael H; Phan, Philippe; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Fisher, Charles G; Hall, Hamilton; McIntosh, Greg; Dea, Nicolas; Malhotra, Armaan K; Davis, Aileen M; He, Yingshi; Harrington, Erin M; Jaja, Blessing NR; Zhu, Mary P; Shakil, Husain; Dea, Nicolas; Jacobs, W Bradley; Cadotte, David W; Paquet, Jérôme; Weber, Michael H; Phan, Philippe; Christie, Sean D; Nataraj, Andrew; Bailey, Christopher S; Johnson, Michael G; Fisher, Charles G; Manson, Neil; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Thomas, Kenneth C; Hall, Hamilton; Fehlings, Michael G; Ahn, Henry; Ginsberg, Howard J; Witiw, Christopher D; Wilson, Jefferson R; Althagafi, Alwalaa; McIntosh, Greg; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Rizzuto, Michael A; Ailon, Tamir; Dea, Nicolas; Evaniew, Nathan; Jacobs, Bradley W; Paquet, Jerome; Rampersaud, Raja; Hall, Hamilton; Bailey, Christopher S; Weber, Michael; Johnson, Michael G; Nataraj, Andrew; Attabib, Najmedden; Cadotte, David W; Manson, Neil; Stratton, Alexandra; Christie, Sean D; Thomas, Kenneth C; Wilson, Jefferson R; Fisher, Charles G; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Salo, Paul; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Dandurand, Charlotte; Laghaei, Pedram Farimani; Ailon, Tamir; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Dea, Nicolas; Dvorak, Marcel; Fisher, Charles; Kwon, Brian K; Paquette, Scott; Street, John; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Bouchard, Jacques; Salo, Paul; Jacobs, Brad; Varshney, Vishal P; Sahjpaul, Ramesh; Paquette, Scott; Osborn, Jill; Bak, Alex B; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Leck, Erika; Marshall, Emily; Christie, Sean; Elkaim, Lior M; Lasry, Oliver J; Raj, Aditya; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Cherry, Ahmed; McIntosh, Greg; Nielsen, Christopher; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Manoharan, Ragavan; Iorio, Carlo; Xu, Mark; Perruccio, Anthony; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Stratton, Alexandra; Tierney, Sarah; Wai, Eugene K; Phan, Philippe; Kingwell, Stephen; Magnan, Marie-Claude; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Salo, Paul; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Spanninga, Barend; Hoelen, Thomáy-Claire A; Johnson, Scott; Arts, Jacobus JC; Bailey, Chris S; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Levett, Jordan J; Elkaim, Lior M; Alotaibi, Naif M; Weber, Michael H; Dea, Nicolas; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M; Cherry, Ahmed; Yee, Albert; Jaber, Nadia; Fehlings, Michael; Cunningham, Erin; Adams, Tyler; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Vandewint, Amanda; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Hebert, Jeffery; Werier, Joel; Smit, Kevin; Villeneuve, James; Sachs, Adam; Abdelbary, Hesham; Al-Mosuli, Yusra Kassim; Rakhra, Kawan; Phan, Philippe; Nagata, Kosei; Gum, Jeffrey L; Brown, Morgan E; Daniels, Christy L; Carreon, Leah Y; Bonello, John-Peter; Koucheki, Robert; Abbas, Aazad; Lex, Johnathan; Nucci, Nicholas; Whyne, Cari; Larouche, Jeremie; Ahn, Henry; Finkelstein, Joel; Lewis, Stephen; Toor, Jay; Lee, Nathan J; Orosz, Lindsay D; Gum, Jeffrey L; Poulter, Gregory T; Jazini, Ehsan; Haines, Colin M; Good, Christopher R; Lehman, Ronald A; Crawford, Eric J; Ravinsky, Robert A; Perruccio, Anthony V; Coyte, Peter C; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Freire-Archer, Millaray; Sarraj, Mohamed; AlShaalan, Fawaz; Koziarz, Alex; Thornley, Patrick; Alnemari, Haitham; Oitment, Colby; Bharadwaj, Lalita; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Kearney, Jill; Kundap, Uday; Investigators, Csorn; Hebert, Jeffrey; Elkaim, Lior M; Levett, Jordan J; Niazi, Farbod; Bokhari, Rakan; Alotaibi, Naif M; Lasry, Oliver J; Bissonnette, Vincent; Yen, David; Muddaluru, Varun S; Gandhi, Pranjan; Mastrolonardo, Alexander; Guha, Daipayan; Pahuta, Markian A; Christie, Sean D; Vandertuin, Trevor; Ritcey, Gillian; Rainham, Daniel; Alhawsawi, Mamdoh; Mumtaz, Rohail; Abdelnour, Mark; Qumquji, Feras; Soroceanu, Alex; Swamy, Ganesh; Thomas, Kenneth; Wai, Eugene; Phan, Philippe; Bhatt, Fenil R; Orosz, Lindsay D; Yamout, Tarek; Good, Christopher R; Schuler, Thomas C; Nguyen, Tiffany; Jazini, Ehsan; Haines, Colin M; Oppermann, Marcelo; Gupta, Shaurya; Ramjist, Joel; Oppermann, Priscila Santos; Yang, Victor XD; Levett, Jordan J; Elkaim, Lior M; Niazi, Farbod; Weber, Michael H; Ioro-Morin, Christian; Bonizzato, Marco; Weil, Alexander G; Oppermann, Marcelo; Ramjist, Joel; Gupta, Shaurya; Oppermann, Priscila S; Yang, Victor XD; Jung, Youngkyung; Muddalaru, Varun; Gandhi, Pranjan; Guha, Daipayan; Koucheki, Robert; Bonello, John-Peter; Abbas, Aazad; Lex, Johnathan R; Nucci, Nicholas; Whyne, Cari; Yee, Albert; Ahn, Henry; Finkelstein, Joel; Larouche, Jeremie; Lewis, Stephen; Toor, Jay; Dhawan, Alaina; Dhawan, Jillian; Sharma, Ajay N; Azzam, Daniel B; Cherry, Ahmed; Fehlings, Michael G; Orosz, Lindsay D; Lee, Nathan J; Yamout, Tarek; Gum, Jeffrey L; Lehman, Ronald A; Poulter, Gregory T; Haines, Colin M; Jazini, Ehsan; Good, Christopher R; Ridha, Barzany B; Persad, Amit; Fourney, Daryl; Byers, Elizabeth; Gallagher, Michelle; Sugar, James; Brown, Justin L; Wang, Zhi; Shen, Jesse; Boubez, Ghassan; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Shedid, Daniel; Rizkallah, Maroun; Singh, Manmohan; Singh, Pankaj Kumar; Lawrence, Peyton Lloyd; Dell, Shevaughn; Goodluck-Tyndall, Ronette; Wade, Kevin; Morgan, Mark; Bruce, Carl; Silva, Yan Gabriel Morais David; Pimenta, Newton; LaRue, Bernard; Aldakhil, Salman; Blanchard, Jocelyn; Couture, Jerome; Goulet, Julien; Bednar, Drew A; Raj, Ruheksh; Urquhart, Jennifer; Bailey, Chris; Christie, Sean D; Greene, Ryan; Chaves, Jennyfer Paulla Galdino; Zarrabian, Mohammed; Sigurdson, Leif; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Iorio, Carlo; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Xu, Mark; Raj, Aditya; Nielsen, Christopher J; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Lewis, Stephen JItem Open Access Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy: propensity-matched analysis of 24-month outcomes from the Quality Outcomes Database.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-08) Yang, Eunice; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Chou, Dean; Bydon, Mohamad; Bisson, Erica F; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Gottfried, Oren N; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Foley, Kevin T; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Virk, Michael S; Knightly, John J; Meyer, Scott; Park, Paul; Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Shaffrey, Mark E; Buchholz, Avery L; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Sherrod, Brandon A; Agarwal, Nitin; Haid, Regis W; Chan, Andrew KObjective
Compared with laminectomy with posterior cervical fusion (PCF), cervical laminoplasty (CL) may result in different outcomes for those operated on for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The aim of this study was to compare 24-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for laminoplasty versus PCF by using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM data set.Methods
This was a retrospective study using an augmented data set from the prospectively collected QOD Registry Cervical Module. Patients undergoing laminoplasty or PCF for CSM were included. Using the nearest-neighbor method, the authors performed 1:1 propensity matching based on age, operated levels, and baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain scores. The 24-month PROs, i.e., mJOA, Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS neck pain, VAS arm pain, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction scores, were compared. Only cases in the subaxial cervical region were included; those that crossed the cervicothoracic junction were excluded.Results
From the 1141 patients included in the QOD CSM data set who underwent anterior or posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy, 946 (82.9%) had 24 months of follow-up. Of these, 43 patients who underwent laminoplasty and 191 who underwent PCF met the inclusion criteria. After matching, the groups were similar for baseline characteristics, including operative levels (CL group: 4.0 ± 0.9 vs PCF group: 4.2 ± 1.1, p = 0.337) and baseline PROs (p > 0.05), except for a higher percentage involved in activities outside the home in the CL group (95.3% vs 81.4%, p = 0.044). The 24-month follow-up for the matched cohorts was similar (CL group: 88.4% vs PCF group: 83.7%, p = 0.534). Patients undergoing laminoplasty had significantly lower estimated blood loss (99.3 ± 91.7 mL vs 186.7 ± 142.7 mL, p = 0.003), decreased length of stay (3.0 ± 1.6 days vs 4.5 ± 3.3 days, p = 0.012), and a higher rate of routine discharge (88.4% vs 62.8%, p = 0.006). The CL cohort also demonstrated a higher rate of return to activities (47.2% vs 21.2%, p = 0.023) after 3 months. Laminoplasty was associated with a larger improvement in 24-month NDI score (-19.6 ± 18.9 vs -9.1 ± 21.9, p = 0.031). Otherwise, there were no 3- or 24-month differences in mJOA, mean NDI, VAS neck pain, VAS arm pain, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and distribution of NASS satisfaction scores (p > 0.05) between the cohorts.Conclusions
Compared with PCF, laminoplasty was associated with decreased blood loss, decreased length of hospitalization, and higher rates of home discharge. At 3 months, laminoplasty was associated with a higher rate of return to baseline activities. At 24 months, laminoplasty was associated with greater improvements in neck disability. Otherwise, laminoplasty and PCF shared similar outcomes for functional status, pain, quality of life, and satisfaction. Laminoplasty and PCF achieved similar neck pain scores, suggesting that moderate preoperative neck pain may not necessarily be a contraindication for laminoplasty.Item Open Access Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and driving abilities: defining the prevalence and long-term postoperative outcomes using the Quality Outcomes Database.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-02) Agarwal, Nitin; Johnson, Sarah E; Bydon, Mohamad; Bisson, Erica F; Chan, Andrew K; Shabani, Saman; Letchuman, Vijay; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Lu, Daniel C; Wang, Michael Y; Lavadi, Raj Swaroop; Haid, Regis W; Knightly, John J; Sherrod, Brandon A; Gottfried, Oren N; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Goldberg, Jacob L; Virk, Michael S; Hussain, Ibrahim; Glassman, Steven D; Shaffrey, Mark E; Park, Paul; Foley, Kevin T; Pennicooke, Brenton; Coric, Domagoj; Slotkin, Jonathan R; Upadhyaya, Cheerag; Potts, Eric A; Tumialán, Luis M; Chou, Dean; Fu, Kai-Ming G; Asher, Anthony L; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) can cause significant difficulty with driving and a subsequent reduction in an individual's quality of life due to neurological deterioration. The positive impact of surgery on postoperative patient-reported driving capabilities has been seldom explored.Methods
The CSM module of the Quality Outcomes Database was utilized. Patient-reported driving ability was assessed via the driving section of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire. This is an ordinal scale in which 0 represents the absence of symptoms while driving and 5 represents a complete inability to drive due to symptoms. Patients were considered to have an impairment in their driving ability if they reported an NDI driving score of 3 or higher (signifying impairment in driving duration due to symptoms). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate mediators of baseline impairment and improvement at 24 months after surgery, which was defined as an NDI driving score < 3.Results
A total of 1128 patients who underwent surgical intervention for CSM were included, of whom 354 (31.4%) had baseline driving impairment due to CSM. Moderate (OR 2.3) and severe (OR 6.3) neck pain, severe arm pain (OR 1.6), mild-moderate (OR 2.1) and severe (OR 2.5) impairment in hand/arm dexterity, severe impairment in leg use/walking (OR 1.9), and severe impairment of urinary function (OR 1.8) were associated with impaired driving ability at baseline. Of the 291 patients with baseline impairment and available 24-month follow-up data, 209 (71.8%) reported postoperative improvement in their driving ability. This improvement seemed to be mediated particularly through the achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain and improvement in leg function/walking. Patients with improved driving at 24 months noted higher postoperative satisfaction (88.5% vs 62.2%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to achieve a clinically significant improvement in their quality of life (50.7% vs 37.8%, p < 0.01).Conclusions
Nearly one-third of patients with CSM report impaired driving ability at presentation. Seventy-two percent of these patients reported improvements in their driving ability within 24 months of surgery. Surgical management of CSM can significantly improve patients' driving abilities at 24 months and hence patients' quality of life.Item Open Access Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-01) Chan, Andrew K; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Gottfried, Oren N; Park, Christine; Than, Khoi D; Bisson, Erica F; Bydon, Mohamad; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Foley, Kevin T; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Virk, Michael S; Knightly, John J; Meyer, Scott; Park, Paul; Upadhyaya, Cheerag; Shaffrey, Mark E; Buchholz, Avery L; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Sherrod, Brandon A; Agarwal, Nitin; Chou, Dean; Haid, Regis W; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain.Methods
This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF.Results
Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (β = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (β = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002).Conclusions
Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.Item Open Access Characteristics of patients who return to work after undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-05) Bergin, Stephen M; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Gottfried, Oren N; Johnson, Eli; Bisson, Erica F; Wang, Michael Y; Knightly, John J; Virk, Michael S; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Shaffrey, Mark E; Park, Paul; Foley, Kevin T; Coric, Domagoj; Slotkin, Jonathan R; Potts, Eric A; Chou, Dean; Fu, Kai-Ming G; Haid, Regis W; Asher, Anthony L; Bydon, Mohamad; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Than, Khoi DObjective
Return to work (RTW) is an important surgical outcome for patients who are employed, yet a significant number of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who are employed undergo cervical spine surgery and fail to RTW. In this study, the authors investigated factors associated with failure to RTW in the CSM population who underwent cervical spine surgery and who were considered to have a good surgical outcome yet failed to RTW.Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from the cervical myelopathy module of a national spine registry, the Quality Outcomes Database. The CSM data set of the Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients who were employed at the time of surgery and planned to RTW postoperatively. Distinct multivariable logistic regression models were fitted with 3-month RTW as an outcome for the overall population to identify risk factors for failure to RTW. Good outcomes were defined as patients who had no adverse events (readmissions or complications), who had achieved 30% improvement in Neck Disability Index score, and who were satisfied (North American Spine Society satisfaction score of 1 or 2) at 3 months postsurgery.Results
Of the 409 patients who underwent surgery, 80% (n = 327) did RTW at 3 months after surgery. At 3 months, 56.9% of patients met the criteria for a good surgical outcome, and patients with a good outcome were more likely to RTW (88.1% vs 69.2%, p < 0.01). Of patients with a good outcome, 11.9% failed to RTW at 3 months. Risk factors for failing to RTW despite a good outcome included preoperative short-term disability or leave status (OR 3.03 [95% CI 1.66-7.90], p = 0.02); a higher baseline Neck Disability Index score (OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.09-1.84], p < 0.01); and higher neck pain score at 3 months postoperatively (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99], p = 0.04).Conclusions
Most patients with CSM who undergo spine surgery reenter the workforce within 3 months from surgery, with RTW rates being higher among patients who experience good outcomes. Among patients with good outcomes who were employed, failure to RTW was associated with being on preoperative short-term disability or leave status prior to surgery as well as higher neck pain scores at baseline and at 3 months postoperatively.Item Open Access Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2016-07) Than, Khoi D; Park, Paul; Fu, Kai-Ming; Nguyen, Stacie; Wang, Michael Y; Chou, Dean; Nunley, Pierce D; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Deviren, Vedat; Uribe, Juan S; La Marca, Frank; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Mundis, Gregory M; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study GroupOBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are increasingly used to treat adult spinal deformity. However, standard minimally invasive spinal deformity techniques have a more limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) than traditional open surgery. This study sought to compare "best" versus "worst" outcomes of MIS to identify variables that may predispose patients to postoperative success. METHODS A retrospective review of minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery cases was performed to identify parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores versus those in the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI scores at 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, and the top 20% of patients in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (best group, 22 patients) were compared with the bottom 20% (worst group, 21 patients). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, pre- and postoperative Cobb angles, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, levels fused, operating room time, and blood loss between the best and worst groups. However, the mean preoperative ODI score was significantly higher (worse disability) at baseline in the group that had the greatest improvement in ODI score (58.2 vs 39.7, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative PI-LL mismatch (12.8° best vs 19.5° worst, p = 0.298). The best group had significantly less postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 3.4 vs 6.9 cm, p = 0.043) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (10.4° vs 19.4°, p = 0.027) than the worst group. The best group also had better postoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend that spinal deformity surgeons using MIS techniques focus on correcting a patient's PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA to < 5 cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will attain the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while the spines of patients who do the worst are not appropriately corrected and may be fused into a fixed sagittal plane deformity.Item Open Access Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-09) Porche, Ken; Bisson, Erica F; Sherrod, Brandon; Dru, Alexander; Chan, Andrew K; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Gottfried, Oren N; Bydon, Mohamad; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Foley, Kevin T; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Virk, Michael S; Knightly, John J; Meyer, Scott; Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Shaffrey, Mark E; Uribe, Juan S; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Chou, Dean; Haid, Regis W; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Park, PaulMyelopathy in the cervical spine can present with diverse symptoms, many of which can be debilitating for patients. Patients with radiculopathy symptoms demonstrate added complexity because of the overlapping symptoms and treatment considerations. The authors sought to assess outcomes in patients with myelopathy presenting with or without concurrent radiculopathy. The Quality Outcomes Database, a prospectively collected multi-institutional database, was used to analyze demographic, clinical, and surgical variables of patients presenting with myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy as a result of degenerative pathology. Outcome measures included arm (VAS-arm) and neck (VAS-neck) visual analog scale (VAS) scores, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale score, EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 3, 12, and 24 months compared with baseline. A total of 1015 patients were included in the study: 289 patients with myelopathy alone (M0), 239 with myeloradiculopathy but no arm pain (MRAP-), and 487 patients with myeloradiculopathy and arm pain (MRAP+). M0 patients were older than the myeloradiculopathy cohorts combined (M0 64.2 vs MRAP- + MRAP+ 59.5 years, p < 0.001), whereas MRAP+ patients had higher BMI and a greater incidence of current smoking compared with the other cohorts. There were more anterior approaches used in in MRAP+ patients and more posterior approaches used in M0 patients. In severely myelopathic patients (mJOA scale score ≤ 10), posterior approaches were used more often for M0 (p < 0.0001) and MRAP+ (p < 0.0001) patients. Patients with myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy both exhibited significant improvement at 1 and 2 years across all outcome domains. The amount of improvement did not vary based on surgical approach. In comparing cohort outcomes, postoperative outcome differences were associated with patient-reported scores at baseline. Patients with myelopathy and those with myeloradiculopathy demonstrated significant and similar improvement in arm and neck pain scores, myelopathy, disability, and quality of life at 3 months that was sustained at 1- and 2-year follow-up intervals. More radicular symptoms and arm pain increased the likelihood of a surgeon choosing an anterior approach, whereas more severe myelopathy increased the likelihood of approaching posteriorly. Surgical approach itself was not an independent predictor of outcome.Item Open Access Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.(World neurosurgery, 2016-03) Park, Paul; Wang, Michael Y; Nguyen, Stacie; Mundis, Gregory M; La Marca, Frank; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Okonkwo, David O; Kanter, Adam S; Fessler, Richard; Eastlack, Robert K; Chou, Dean; Deviren, Vedat; Nunley, Pierce D; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study GroupObjective
Obesity can be associated with increased complications and potentially worse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of obesity on complications and outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS).Methods
A multicenter database of patients with ASD treated via MIS was queried. Of 190 patients in the database, 77 fit the inclusion criteria of 3 or more spinal levels treated minimally invasively. Patients were divided by body mass index (BMI) <30 (nonobese; n = 59) and BMI ≥ 30 (obese; n = 18).Results
Mean BMI was 24.6 nonobese and 35.0 obese (P < 0.001). There were mean 3.8 interbody fusions nonobese and 4.7 obese (P = 0.065). Levels treated posteriorly averaged 5.8 nonobese and 5.9 obese (P = 0.502). Mean follow-up was 34.4 months nonobese and 35.3 months obese (P = 0.976). Baseline radiographic parameters were similar between groups. Postoperatively, SVA averaged 83.9 mm obese and 20.4 mm nonobese (P = 0.002). Postoperative lumbar lordosis-pelvic incidence mismatch averaged 17.9° obese and 9.9° nonobese (P = 0.028). Both groups had improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores with no difference in postoperative ODI scores between groups (P = 0.090). Similarly, both groups had decreased VAS scores for back and leg pain with no difference between groups postoperatively. Twenty (33.9%) nonobese patients versus 7 (38.9%) obese patients had complications (P = 0.452).Conclusions
Our results suggest that obesity does not negatively impact complication rate or clinical outcomes in patients with ASD treated via MIS approaches.Item Open Access Correlation of the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association With Functional and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Study.(Neurosurgery, 2022-12) Yee, Timothy J; Upadhyaya, Cheerag; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Bisson, Erica F; Turner, Jay; Knightly, Jack J; Fu, Kai-Ming; Foley, Kevin T; Tumialan, Luis; Shaffrey, Mark E; Bydon, Mohamad; Mummaneni, Praveen; Chou, Dean; Chan, Andrew; Meyer, Scott; Asher, Anthony L; Shaffrey, Christopher; Gottfried, Oren N; Than, Khoi D; Wang, Michael Y; Buchholz, Avery L; Haid, Regis; Park, Paul; Park, PaulBackground
The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score is a widely used and validated metric for assessing severity of myelopathy. Its relationship to functional and quality-of-life outcomes after surgery has not been fully described.Objective
To quantify the association of the mJOA with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.Methods
The cervical module of the prospectively enrolled Quality Outcomes Database was queried retrospectively for adult patients who underwent single-stage degenerative cervical myelopathy surgery. The mJOA score, NDI, and EQ-5D were assessed preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Improvement in mJOA was used as the independent variable in univariate and multivariable linear and logistic regression models.Results
Across 14 centers, 1121 patients were identified, mean age 60.6 ± 11.8 years, and 52.5% male. Anterior-only operations were performed in 772 patients (68.9%). By univariate linear regression, improvements in mJOA were associated with improvements in NDI and EQ-5D at 3 and 12 months postoperatively (all P < .0001) and with improvements in the 10 NDI items individually. These findings were similar in multivariable regression incorporating potential confounders. The Pearson correlation coefficients for changes in mJOA with changes in NDI were -0.31 and -0.38 at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The Pearson correlation coefficients for changes in mJOA with changes in EQ-5D were 0.29 and 0.34 at 3 and 12 months.Conclusion
Improvements in mJOA correlated weakly with improvements in NDI and EQ-5D, suggesting that changes in mJOA may not be a suitable proxy for functional and quality-of-life outcomes.Item Open Access Cost Benefit of Implementation of Risk Stratification Models for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.(Global Spine J, 2023-12-11) Passias, Peter G; Williamson, Tyler K; Kummer, Nicholas A; Pellisé, Ferran; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Serra-Burriel, Miguel; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Vira, Shaleen; Gum, Jeffrey L; Haddad, Sleiman; Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Francisco Javier; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Daniels, Alan H; Chou, Dean; Klineberg, Eric O; Gupta, Munish C; Kebaish, Khaled M; Kelly, Michael P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Kleinstück, Frank; Obeid, Ibrahim; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Alanay, Ahmet; Ames, Christopher P; Schwab, Frank J; Hostin, Richard A; Bess, Shay; International Spine Study GroupSTUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility. RESULTS: By 2 years, 31% experienced a major complication and 23% underwent reoperation. Patients with ≤2 risk factors had significantly less major complications. Patients with 2 risk factors improved the most from baseline to 2Y in ODI. Average cost increased by $8234 per risk factor (R2 = .981). Cost-per-QALY at 2Y increased by $122,650 per risk factor (R2 = .794). Adjusted generalized linear model demonstrated a significant trend between increasing risk score and increasing cost-utility (r2 = .408, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of defined patient-specific and surgical risk factors, especially those with greater than two, were associated with increased index surgical costs and diminished cost-utility. Efforts to optimize patient physiology and minimize surgical risk would likely reduce healthcare expenditures and improve the overall cost-utility profile for ASD interventions.Level of evidence: III.Item Open Access Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 5-year Quality Outcomes Database study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-08) Yee, Timothy J; Liles, Campbell; Johnson, Sarah E; Ambati, Vardhaan S; DiGiorgio, Anthony M; Alan, Nima; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Bisson, Erica F; Knightly, John J; Fu, Kai-Ming G; Foley, Kevin T; Shaffrey, Mark E; Bydon, Mohamad; Chou, Dean; Chan, Andrew K; Meyer, Scott; Asher, Anthony L; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Slotkin, Jonathan R; Wang, Michael Y; Haid, Regis W; Glassman, Steven D; Virk, Michael S; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Park, PaulObjective
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), referred to as "PLIF/TLIF," is a commonly performed operation for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Its long-term cost-effectiveness has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year cost-effectiveness of PLIF/TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using prospective data collected from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).Methods
Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter QOD grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included if they underwent single-stage PLIF/TLIF. EQ-5D scores at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 60 months were used to calculate gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with surgery relative to preoperative baseline. Healthcare-related costs associated with the index surgery and related reoperations were calculated using Medicare reimbursement-based cost estimates and validated using price transparency diagnosis-related group (DRG) charges and Medicare charge-to-cost ratios (CCRs). Cost per QALY gained over 60 months postoperatively was assessed.Results
Across 12 surgical centers, 385 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 60.2 (95% CI 59.1-61.3) years, and 38% of patients were male. The reoperation rate was 5.7%. DRG 460 cost estimates were stable between our Medicare reimbursement-based models and the CCR-based model, validating the focus on Medicare reimbursement. Across the entire cohort, the mean QALY gain at 60 months postoperatively was 1.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.18), and the mean cost of PLIF/TLIF was $31,634. PLIF/TLIF was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511. Among patients who did not undergo reoperation (n = 363), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.20), and cost per QALY gained was $27,591. Among those who underwent reoperation (n = 22), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 0.68 (95% CI 0.21-1.15), and the cost per QALY gained was $80,580.Conclusions
PLIF/TLIF for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511 with Medicare fees. This is far below the well-established societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, suggesting long-term cost-effectiveness. PLIF/TLIF remains cost-effective for patients who undergo reoperation.Item Open Access Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.(Neurosurgical focus, 2023-06) Shahrestani, Shane; Chan, Andrew K; Bisson, Erica F; Bydon, Mohamad; Glassman, Steven D; Foley, Kevin T; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Potts, Eric A; Shaffrey, Mark E; Coric, Domagoj; Knightly, John J; Park, Paul; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Slotkin, Jonathan R; Asher, Anthony L; Virk, Michael S; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Guan, Jian; Haid, Regis W; Agarwal, Nitin; Chou, Dean; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
Spondylolisthesis is a common operative disease in the United States, but robust predictive models for patient outcomes remain limited. The development of models that accurately predict postoperative outcomes would be useful to help identify patients at risk of complicated postoperative courses and determine appropriate healthcare and resource utilization for patients. As such, the purpose of this study was to develop k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classification algorithms to identify patients at increased risk for extended hospital length of stay (LOS) following neurosurgical intervention for spondylolisthesis.Methods
The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) spondylolisthesis data set was queried for patients receiving either decompression alone or decompression plus fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Preoperative and perioperative variables were queried, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to identify which variables would be included in the machine learning models. Two KNN models were implemented (k = 25) with a standard training set of 60%, validation set of 20%, and testing set of 20%, one with arthrodesis status (model 1) and the other without (model 2). Feature scaling was implemented during the preprocessing stage to standardize the independent features.Results
Of 608 enrolled patients, 544 met prespecified inclusion criteria. The mean age of all patients was 61.9 ± 12.1 years (± SD), and 309 (56.8%) patients were female. The model 1 KNN had an overall accuracy of 98.1%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 84.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for model 1, showing an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.998. Model 2 had an overall accuracy of 99.1%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 100%, with the same ROC AUC of 0.998.Conclusions
Overall, these findings demonstrate that nonlinear KNN machine learning models have incredibly high predictive value for LOS. Important predictor variables include diabetes, osteoporosis, socioeconomic quartile, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss during surgery, patient educational status, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, BMI, insurance status, smoking status, sex, and age. These models may be considered for external validation by spine surgeons to aid in patient selection and management, resource utilization, and preoperative surgical planning.Item Open Access Development of new postoperative neck pain at 12 and 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-03) Sherrod, Brandon A; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Mulvaney, Graham; Agarwal, Nitin; Chan, Andrew K; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Virk, Michael S; Fu, Kai-Ming; Foley, Kevin T; Park, Paul; Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Knightly, John J; Shaffrey, Mark E; Potts, Eric A; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Gottfried, Oren N; Than, Khoi D; Wang, Michael Y; Tumialán, Luis M; Chou, Dean; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Bydon, Mohamad; Bisson, Erica FObjective
Patients who undergo surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) will occasionally develop postoperative neck pain that was not present preoperatively, yet the incidence of this phenomenon is unclear. The authors aimed to elucidate patient and surgical factors associated with new-onset sustained pain after CSM surgery.Methods
The authors reviewed data from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. The presence of neck pain was defined using the neck pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients with no neck pain at baseline (neck NRS score ≤ 1) were then stratified based on the presence of new postoperative pain development (neck NRS score ≥ 2) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Results
Of 1141 patients in the CSM QOD, 224 (19.6%) reported no neck pain at baseline. Among 170 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 12-month follow-up, 46 (27.1%) reported new postoperative pain. Among 184 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 24-month follow-up, 53 (28.8%) reported new postoperative pain. The mean differences in neck NRS scores were 4.3 for those with new postoperative pain compared with those without at 12 months (4.4 ± 2.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001) and 3.9 at 24 months (4.1 ± 2.4 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). The majority of patients reporting new-onset neck pain reported being satisfied with surgery, but their satisfaction was significantly lower compared with patients without pain at the 12-month (66.7% vs 94.3%, p < 0.001) and 24-month (65.4% vs 90.8%, p < 0.001) follow-ups. The baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) was an independent predictor of new postoperative neck pain at both the 12-month and 24-month time points (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; p = 0.002; and aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.026, respectively). The total number of levels treated was associated with new-onset neck pain at 12 months (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.64; p = 0.005), and duration of symptoms more than 3 months was a predictor of 24-month neck pain (aOR 3.22, 95% CI 1.01-10.22; p = 0.048).Conclusions
Increased NDI at baseline, number of levels treated surgically, and duration of symptoms longer than 3 months preoperatively correlate positively with the risk of new-onset neck pain following CSM surgery. The majority of patients with new-onset neck pain still report satisfaction from surgery, suggesting that the risk of new-onset neck pain should not hinder indicated operations from being performed.Item Open Access Do class III obese patients achieve similar outcomes and satisfaction to nonobese patients following surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-09) Park, Christine; Bhowmick, Deb A; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bisson, Erica F; Bydon, Mohamad; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Foley, Kevin T; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Virk, Michael S; Knightly, John J; Meyer, Scott; Park, Paul; Upadhyaya, Cheerag; Shaffrey, Mark E; Schupper, Alexander J; Uribe, Juan S; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Chan, Andrew K; Chou, Dean; Haid, Regis W; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Gottfried, Oren NObjective
The aim of this study was to compare the rate of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction between cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with and without class III obesity who underwent surgery.Methods
The authors analyzed patients from the 14 highest-enrolling sites in the prospective Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. Patients were dichotomized based on whether or not they were obese (class III, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). PROs including visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), EQ-5D, and North American Spine Society patient satisfaction scores were collected at baseline and 24 months after cervical spine surgery.Results
Of the 1141 patients with CSM who underwent surgery, 230 (20.2%) were obese and 911 (79.8%) were not. The 24-month follow-up rate was 87.4% for PROs. Patients who were obese were younger (58.1 ± 12.1 years vs 61.2 ± 11.6 years, p = 0.001), more frequently female (57.4% vs 44.9%, p = 0.001), and African American (22.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.002) and had a lower education level (high school or less: 49.1% vs 40.8%, p = 0.002) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Clinically at baseline, the obese group had worse neck pain (VAS score: 5.7 ± 3.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.3), arm pain (VAS score: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs 4.8 ± 3.5), disability (NDI score: 42.7 ± 20.4 vs 37.4 ± 20.7), quality of life (EQ-5D score: 0.54 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22), and function (mJOA score: 11.6 ± 2.8 vs 12.2 ± 2.8) (all p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, however, there was no difference in the change in PROs between the two groups. Even after accounting for relevant covariates, no significant difference in achievement of MCID and satisfaction was observed between the two groups at 24 months.Conclusions
Despite the class III obese group having worse baseline clinical presentations, the two cohorts achieved similar rates of satisfaction and MCID in PROs. Class III obesity should not preclude and/or delay surgical management for patients who would otherwise benefit from surgery for CSM.Item Open Access Do comorbid self-reported depression and anxiety influence outcomes following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy?(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-03) Chan, Andrew K; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Park, Christine; Gottfried, Oren N; Than, Khoi D; Bisson, Erica F; Bydon, Mohamad; Asher, Anthony L; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Foley, Kevin T; Wang, Michael Y; Fu, Kai-Ming; Virk, Michael S; Knightly, John J; Meyer, Scott; Park, Paul; Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Shaffrey, Mark E; Buchholz, Avery L; Tumialán, Luis M; Turner, Jay D; Michalopoulos, Giorgos D; Sherrod, Brandon A; Agarwal, Nitin; Chou, Dean; Haid, Regis W; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
Depression and anxiety are associated with inferior outcomes following spine surgery. In this study, the authors examined whether patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who have both self-reported depression (SRD) and self-reported anxiety (SRA) have worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with patients who have only one or none of these comorbidities.Methods
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. Comparisons were made among patients who reported the following: 1) either SRD or SRA, 2) both SRD and SRA, or 3) neither comorbidity at baseline. PROs at 3, 12, and 24 months (scores for the visual analog scale [VAS] for neck pain and arm pain, Neck Disability Index [NDI], modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] scale, EQ-5D, EuroQol VAS [EQ-VAS], and North American Spine Society [NASS] patient satisfaction index) and achievement of respective PRO minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were compared.Results
Of the 1141 included patients, 199 (17.4%) had either SRD or SRA alone, 132 (11.6%) had both SRD and SRA, and 810 (71.0%) had neither. Preoperatively, patients with either SRD or SRA alone had worse scores for VAS neck pain (5.6 ± 3.1 vs 5.1 ± 3.3, p = 0.03), NDI (41.0 ± 19.3 vs 36.8 ± 20.8, p = 0.007), EQ-VAS (57.0 ± 21.0 vs 60.7 ± 21.7, p = 0.03), and EQ-5D (0.53 ± 0.23 vs 0.58 ± 0.21, p = 0.008) than patients without such disorders. Postoperatively, in multivariable adjusted analyses, baseline SRD or SRA alone was associated with inferior improvement in the VAS neck pain score and a lower rate of achieving the MCID for VAS neck pain score at 3 and 12 months, but not at 24 months. At 24 months, patients with SRD or SRA alone experienced less change in EQ-5D scores and were less likely to meet the MCID for EQ-5D than patients without SRD or SRA. Furthermore, patient self-reporting of both psychological comorbidities did not impact PROs at all measured time points compared with self-reporting of only one psychological comorbidity alone. Each cohort (SRD or SRA alone, both SRD and SRA, and neither SRD nor SRA) experienced significant improvements in mean PROs at all measured time points compared with baseline (p < 0.05).Conclusions
Approximately 12% of patients who underwent surgery for CSM presented with both SRD and SRA, and 29% presented with at least one symptom. The presence of either SRD or SRA was independently associated with inferior scores for 3- and 12-month neck pain following surgery, but this difference was not significant at 24 months. However, at long-term follow-up, patients with SRD or SRA experienced lower quality of life than patients without SRD or SRA. The comorbid presence of both depression and anxiety was not associated with worse patient outcomes than either diagnosis alone.Item Open Access Do obese patients undergoing surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis have worse outcomes at 5 years' follow-up? A QOD study.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-09) Zammar, Samer G; Ambati, Vardhaan S; Yee, Timothy J; Patel, Arati; Le, Vivian P; Alan, Nima; Coric, Domagoj; Potts, Eric A; Bisson, Erica F; Knightly, Jack J; Fu, Kai-Ming; Foley, Kevin T; Shaffrey, Mark E; Bydon, Mohamad; Chou, Dean; Chan, Andrew K; Meyer, Scott; Asher, Anthony L; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Slotkin, Jonathan R; Wang, Michael; Haid, Regis; Glassman, Steven D; Park, Paul; Virk, Michael; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
The long-term effects of increased body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes are unknown for patients who undergo surgery for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. The goal of this study was to assess long-term outcomes in obese versus nonobese patients after surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis.Methods
Patients who underwent surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the Quality Outcomes Database's 12 highest enrolling sites (SpineCORe group) were identified. Long-term (5-year) outcomes were compared for patients with BMI ≥ 35 versus BMI < 35.Results
In total, 608 patients (57.6% female) were included. Follow-up was 81% (excluding patients who had died) at 5 years. The BMI ≥ 35 cohort (130 patients, 21.4%) was compared to the BMI < 35 cohort (478 patients, 78.6%). At baseline, patients with BMI ≥ 35 were more likely to be younger (58.5 ± 11.4 vs 63.2 ± 12.0 years old, p < 0.001), to present with both back and leg pain (53.8% vs 37.0%, p = 0.002), and to require ambulation assistance (20.8% vs 9.2%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the cohort with BMI ≥ 35 had worse baseline patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) back (7.6 ± 2.3 vs 6.5 ± 2.8, p < 0.001) and leg (7.1 ± 2.6 vs 6.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.031) pain, disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (53.7 ± 15.7 vs 44.8 ± 17.0, p < 0.001), and quality of life on EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire (0.47 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22, p < 0.001). Patients with BMI ≥ 35 were more likely to undergo fusion (85.4% vs 74.7%, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in 30- and 90-day readmission rates (p > 0.05). Five years postoperatively, there were no differences in reoperation rates or the development of adjacent-segment disease for patients in either BMI < 35 or ≥ 35 cohorts who underwent fusion (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥ 35 was a significant risk factor for not achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for VAS leg pain (OR 0.429, 95% CI 0.209-0.876, p = 0.020), but BMI ≥ 35 was not a predictor for achieving MCID for VAS back pain, ODI, or EQ-5D at 5 years postoperatively.Conclusions
Both obese and nonobese patients benefit from surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. At the 5-year time point, patients with BMI ≥ 35 have similarly low reoperation rates and achieve rates of satisfaction and MCID for back pain (but not leg pain), disability (ODI), and quality of life (EQ-5D) that are similar to those in patients with a BMI < 35.