Browsing by Author "Dailey, Shannon"
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Day by day, hour by hour: Naturalistic language input to infants.(Developmental science, 2019-01) Bergelson, Elika; Amatuni, Andrei; Dailey, Shannon; Koorathota, Sharath; Tor, ShaeliseMeasurements of infants' quotidian experiences provide critical information about early development. However, the role of sampling methods in providing these measurements is rarely examined. Here we directly compare language input from hour-long video-recordings and daylong audio-recordings within the same group of 44 infants at 6 and 7 months. We compared 12 measures of language quantity and lexical diversity, talker variability, utterance-type, and object presence, finding moderate correlations across recording-types. However, video-recordings generally featured far denser noun input across these measures compared to the daylong audio-recordings, more akin to 'peak' audio hours (though not as high in talkers and word-types). Although audio-recordings captured ~10 times more awake-time than videos, the noun input in them was only 2-4 times greater. Notably, whether we compared videos to daylong audio-recordings or peak audio times, videos featured relatively fewer declaratives and more questions; furthermore, the most common video-recorded nouns were less consistent across families than the top audio-recording nouns were. Thus, hour-long videos and daylong audio-recordings revealed fairly divergent pictures of the language infants hear and learn from in their daily lives. We suggest that short video-recordings provide a dense and somewhat different sample of infants' language experiences, rather than a typical one, and should be used cautiously for extrapolation about common words, talkers, utterance-types, and contexts at larger timescales. If theories of language development are to be held accountable to 'facts on the ground' from observational data, greater care is needed to unpack the ramifications of sampling methods of early language input.Item Open Access Examining early word learning and language input through a longitudinal, experimental, and observational lens(2022) Dailey, ShannonChildren learn hundreds of words in a few short years (e.g., Dale & Fenson, 1996; Fernald, Pinto, & Swingley, 1998), but there is wide variability between children (Fenson, 2007). Some of the variability in children’s language skills can be attributed to differences in their language input (e.g., generally, children who hear more words say more words; Huttenlocher, et al., 1991; Huttenlocher, et al., 2010). However, there are many other factors at play that may influence both children’s language input and their ability to learn from that input over time, such as their own cognitive, social, and linguistic developments (Bergelson, 2020). In this dissertation, I ask if differences in infants’ language input explain changes in their word comprehension, explain gender differences in their early language skills, or predict their later language outcomes years later.
In Chapter 1, I review prior work on variation in children’s language experience, how it maps onto their developing language skills, and how children’s own development may affect that input. Chapter 2 investigates how children's word comprehension develops across infancy in an eye-tracking study and a complementary corpus analysis. I find that infants gain semantic precision in word comprehension from age 0;6 to 1;6, but this improvement is not readily explained by changes in their at-home exposure to the tested words. Instead, children's improvements in word comprehension may be driven by cognitive and social developments that aid their word learning. Chapter 3 investigates if differences in children's early language input could drive gender differences in their early language skills. I replicate prior work finding girls have an early word production advantage, but I do not find evidence that they have different language input compared to boys. However, I find that children hear more words once they've said their first word, regardless of gender. These results suggest that children's language input does not vary by gender, but instead by their language abilities. In Chapter 4, I turn to investigating a longer timescale of language input and development. Do children's early language abilities and input in infancy predict their later language outcomes years later? I find that children's early language skills consistently predict their later language skills, and measures of children's early language input do not improve our predictions. In Chapter 5, I summarize and synthesize the results of these three studies and discuss implications and future directions of this work.
Across these three studies, I find that language input is not a strong predictor of differences in children’s language skills. Instead, my results suggest that other factors (such as children’s age, gender, and earlier language development) better predict children’s language outcomes.
Item Open Access Point, walk, talk: Links between three early milestones, from observation and parental report.(Developmental psychology, 2019-08) Moore, Charlotte; Dailey, Shannon; Garrison, Hallie; Amatuni, Andrei; Bergelson, ElikaAround their first birthdays, infants begin to point, walk, and talk. These abilities are appreciable both by researchers with strictly standardized criteria and caregivers with more relaxed notions of what each of these skills entails. Here, we compare the onsets of these skills and links among them across two data collection methods: observation and parental report. We examine pointing, walking, and talking in a sample of 44 infants studied longitudinally from 6 to 18 months. In this sample, links between pointing and vocabulary were tighter than those between walking and vocabulary, supporting a unified sociocommunicative growth account. Indeed, across several cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, pointers had larger vocabularies than their nonpointing peers. In contrast to previous work, this did not hold for walkers' versus crawlers' vocabularies in our sample. Comparing across data sources, we find that reported and observed estimates of the growing vocabulary and of age of walk onset were closely correlated, while agreement between parents and researchers on pointing onset and talking onset was weaker. Taken together, these results support a developmental account in which gesture and language are intertwined aspects of early communication and symbolic thinking, whereas the shift from crawling to walking appears indistinct from age in its relation with language. We conclude that pointing, walking, and talking are on similar timelines yet distinct from one another, and discuss methodological and theoretical implications in the context of early development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).