Browsing by Author "Edmonston, Daniel L"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Continuation versus discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a prospective, randomised, open-label trial.(The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2021-01-07) Cohen, Jordana B; Hanff, Thomas C; William, Preethi; Sweitzer, Nancy; Rosado-Santander, Nelson R; Medina, Carola; Rodriguez-Mori, Juan E; Renna, Nicolás; Chang, Tara I; Corrales-Medina, Vicente; Andrade-Villanueva, Jaime F; Barbagelata, Alejandro; Cristodulo-Cortez, Roberto; Díaz-Cucho, Omar A; Spaak, Jonas; Alfonso, Carlos E; Valdivia-Vega, Renzo; Villavicencio-Carranza, Mirko; Ayala-García, Ricardo J; Castro-Callirgos, Carlos A; González-Hernández, Luz A; Bernales-Salas, Eduardo F; Coacalla-Guerra, Johanna C; Salinas-Herrera, Cynthia D; Nicolosi, Liliana; Basconcel, Mauro; Byrd, James B; Sharkoski, Tiffany; Bendezú-Huasasquiche, Luis E; Chittams, Jesse; Edmonston, Daniel L; Vasquez, Charles R; Chirinos, Julio ABackground
Biological considerations suggest that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors might influence the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether continuing versus discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) affects outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods
The REPLACE COVID trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label trial done at 20 large referral hospitals in seven countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older who were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and were receiving a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor before admission. Individuals with contraindications to continuation or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to continuation or discontinuation of their renin-angiotensin system inhibitor using permuted block randomisation, with allocation concealed using a secure web-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was a global rank score in which participants were ranked across four hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, time on renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction during the hospitalisation. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The REPLACE COVID trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04338009.Findings
Between March 31 and Aug 20, 2020, 152 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either continue or discontinue renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy (continuation group n=75; discontinuation group n=77). Mean age of participants was 62 years (SD 12), 68 (45%) were female, mean body-mass index was 33 kg/m2 (SD 8), and 79 (52%) had diabetes. Compared with discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, continuation had no effect on the global rank score (median rank 73 [IQR 40-110] for continuation vs 81 [38-117] for discontinuation; β-coefficient 8 [95% CI -13 to 29]). There were 16 (21%) of 75 participants in the continuation arm versus 14 (18%) of 77 in the discontinuation arm who required intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation, and 11 (15%) of 75 participants in the continuation group versus ten (13%) of 77 in the discontinuation group died. 29 (39%) participants in the continuation group and 28 (36%) participants in the discontinuation group had at least one adverse event (χ2 test of adverse events between treatment groups p=0·77). There was no difference in blood pressure, serum potassium, or creatinine during follow-up across the two groups.Interpretation
Consistent with international society recommendations, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors can be safely continued in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Funding
REPLACE COVID Investigators, REPLACE COVID Trial Social Fundraising Campaign, and FastGrants.Item Open Access Echocardiography to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension in CKD(Kidney International Reports, 2020-12-01) Edmonston, Daniel L; Rajagopal, Sudarshan; Wolf, Myles© 2020 International Society of Nephrology Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common yet incompletely understood complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although transthoracic echocardiogram is commonly used to noninvasively estimate PH, it has not been validated in a CKD population. We investigated the utility of this diagnostic tool for CKD-associated PH in a large right heart catheterization (RHC) cohort. Methods: We reviewed RHC and echocardiography data in 4036 patients (1714 with CKD) obtained between 2011 and 2014 at a single center. We used multivariate regression to determine the associations of echocardiography measurements with PH, and evaluated whether estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) modified these associations. Using internal validation, we sequentially added measurements to predictive models and analyzed the incremental predictive performance using the change in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ΔAUC) and net reclassification improvement. Results: The echocardiography measurements most strongly associated with the diagnosis of PH included tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right atrial pressure, diastolic dysfunction, and right ventricular function. Among these measurements, eGFR significantly modified the associations of TAPSE and diastolic dysfunction with the diagnosis of PH. The model consisting of a combination of TRV, right atrial pressure, and TAPSE most accurately predicted the diagnosis of PH in a CKD population (AUC 0.82). Conclusions: The optimal model to predict PH diagnosis included TRV, right atrial pressure, and TAPSE. Since TAPSE more strongly associated with PH in the CKD population, these findings support a CKD-specific approach to the development of noninvasive screening algorithms for PH.Item Open Access Pulmonary Hypertension Subtypes and Mortality in CKD.(American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2019-11-12) Edmonston, Daniel L; Parikh, Kishan S; Rajagopal, Sudarshan; Shaw, Linda K; Abraham, Dennis; Grabner, Alexander; Sparks, Matthew A; Wolf, MylesRATIONALE & OBJECTIVE:Pulmonary hypertension (PH) contributes to cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the pathophysiology is mostly unknown. This study sought to estimate the prevalence and consequences of PH subtypes in the setting of CKD. STUDY DESIGN:Observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS:We examined 12,618 patients with a right heart catheterization in the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014. EXPOSURES:Baseline kidney function stratified by CKD glomerular filtration rate category and PH subtype. OUTCOMES:All-cause mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH:Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS:In this cohort, 73.4% of patients with CKD had PH, compared with 56.9% of patients without CKD. Isolated postcapillary PH (39.0%) and combined pre- and postcapillary PH (38.3%) were the most common PH subtypes in CKD. Conversely, precapillary PH was the most common subtype in the non-CKD cohort (35.9%). The relationships between mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and right atrial pressure with mortality were similar in both the CKD and non-CKD cohorts. Compared with those without PH, precapillary PH conferred the highest mortality risk among patients without CKD (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.00-2.57). By contrast, in those with CKD, combined pre- and postcapillary PH was associated with the highest risk for mortality in CKD in adjusted analyses (compared with no PH, HRs of 1.89 [95% CI, 1.57-2.28], 1.87 [95% CI, 1.52-2.31], 2.13 [95% CI, 1.52-2.97], and 1.63 [95% CI, 1.12-2.36] for glomerular filtration rate categories G3a, G3b, G4, and G5/G5D). LIMITATIONS:The cohort referred for right heart catheterization may not be generalizable to the general population. Serum creatinine data in the 6 months preceding catheterization may not reflect true baseline CKD. Observational design precludes assumptions of causality. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with CKD referred for right heart catheterization, PH is common and associated with poor survival. Combined pre- and postcapillary PH was common and portended the worst survival for patients with CKD.Item Open Access Randomized elimination and prolongation of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in coronavirus 2019 (REPLACE COVID) Trial Protocol.(Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020-10) Cohen, Jordana B; Hanff, Thomas C; Corrales-Medina, Vicente; William, Preethi; Renna, Nicolas; Rosado-Santander, Nelson R; Rodriguez-Mori, Juan E; Spaak, Jonas; Andrade-Villanueva, Jaime; Chang, Tara I; Barbagelata, Alejandro; Alfonso, Carlos E; Bernales-Salas, Eduardo; Coacalla, Johanna; Castro-Callirgos, Carlos Augusto; Tupayachi-Venero, Karen E; Medina, Carola; Valdivia, Renzo; Villavicencio, Mirko; Vasquez, Charles R; Harhay, Michael O; Chittams, Jesse; Sharkoski, Tiffany; Byrd, James Brian; Edmonston, Daniel L; Sweitzer, Nancy; Chirinos, Julio ASevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is associated with high incidence of multiorgan dysfunction and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which facilitates SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry, may be impacted by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), two commonly used antihypertensive classes. In a multicenter, international randomized controlled trial that began enrollment on March 31, 2020, participants are randomized to continuation vs withdrawal of their long-term outpatient ACEI or ARB upon hospitalization with COVID-19. The primary outcome is a hierarchical global rank score incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction severity. Approval for the study has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution, and all participants will provide informed consent. A data safety monitoring board has been assembled to provide independent oversight of the project.