Browsing by Author "El Sahly, Hana M"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Baricitinib versus dexamethasone for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 (ACTT-4): a randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial.
    (The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2022-05-23) Wolfe, Cameron R; Tomashek, Kay M; Patterson, Thomas F; Gomez, Carlos A; Marconi, Vincent C; Jain, Mamta K; Yang, Otto O; Paules, Catharine I; Palacios, Guillermo M Ruiz; Grossberg, Robert; Harkins, Michelle S; Mularski, Richard A; Erdmann, Nathaniel; Sandkovsky, Uriel; Almasri, Eyad; Pineda, Justino Regalado; Dretler, Alexandra W; de Castilla, Diego Lopez; Branche, Angela R; Park, Pauline K; Mehta, Aneesh K; Short, William R; McLellan, Susan LF; Kline, Susan; Iovine, Nicole M; El Sahly, Hana M; Doernberg, Sarah B; Oh, Myoung-Don; Huprikar, Nikhil; Hohmann, Elizabeth; Kelley, Colleen F; Holodniy, Mark; Kim, Eu Suk; Sweeney, Daniel A; Finberg, Robert W; Grimes, Kevin A; Maves, Ryan C; Ko, Emily R; Engemann, John J; Taylor, Barbara S; Ponce, Philip O; Larson, LuAnn; Melendez, Dante Paolo; Seibert, Allan M; Rouphael, Nadine G; Strebe, Joslyn; Clark, Jesse L; Julian, Kathleen G; de Leon, Alfredo Ponce; Cardoso, Anabela; de Bono, Stephanie; Atmar, Robert L; Ganesan, Anuradha; Ferreira, Jennifer L; Green, Michelle; Makowski, Mat; Bonnett, Tyler; Beresnev, Tatiana; Ghazaryan, Varduhi; Dempsey, Walla; Nayak, Seema U; Dodd, Lori E; Beigel, John H; Kalil, Andre C; ACTT-4 Study Group

    Background

    Baricitinib and dexamethasone have randomised trials supporting their use for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. We assessed the combination of baricitinib plus remdesivir versus dexamethasone plus remdesivir in preventing progression to mechanical ventilation or death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.

    Methods

    In this randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial, patients were enrolled at 67 trial sites in the USA (60 sites), South Korea (two sites), Mexico (two sites), Singapore (two sites), and Japan (one site). Hospitalised adults (≥18 years) with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen administered by low-flow (≤15 L/min), high-flow (>15 L/min), or non-invasive mechanical ventilation modalities who met the study eligibility criteria (male or non-pregnant female adults ≥18 years old with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either baricitinib, remdesivir, and placebo, or dexamethasone, remdesivir, and placebo using a permuted block design. Randomisation was stratified by study site and baseline ordinal score at enrolment. All patients received remdesivir (≤10 days) and either baricitinib (or matching oral placebo) for a maximum of 14 days or dexamethasone (or matching intravenous placebo) for a maximum of 10 days. The primary outcome was the difference in mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29 between the two treatment groups in the modified intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population, comprising all participants who received one dose of the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04640168.

    Findings

    Between Dec 1, 2020, and April 13, 2021, 1047 patients were assessed for eligibility. 1010 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 516 (51%) to baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo and 494 (49%) to dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo. The mean age of the patients was 58·3 years (SD 14·0) and 590 (58%) of 1010 patients were male. 588 (58%) of 1010 patients were White, 188 (19%) were Black, 70 (7%) were Asian, and 18 (2%) were American Indian or Alaska Native. 347 (34%) of 1010 patients were Hispanic or Latino. Mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29 was similar between the study groups (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 87·0% [95% CI 83·7 to 89·6] in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 87·6% [84·2 to 90·3] in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group; risk difference 0·6 [95% CI -3·6 to 4·8]; p=0·91). The odds ratio for improved status in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group compared with the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group was 1·01 (95% CI 0·80 to 1·27). At least one adverse event occurred in 149 (30%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 179 (37%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 7·5% [1·6 to 13·3]; p=0·014). 21 (4%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group had at least one treatment-related adverse event versus 49 (10%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 6·0% [2·8 to 9·3]; p=0·00041). Severe or life-threatening grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 143 (28%) of 503 patients in the baricitinib plus remdesivir plus placebo group and 174 (36%) of 482 patients in the dexamethasone plus remdesivir plus placebo group (risk difference 7·7% [1·8 to 13·4]; p=0·012).

    Interpretation

    In hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen by low-flow, high-flow, or non-invasive ventilation, baricitinib plus remdesivir and dexamethasone plus remdesivir resulted in similar mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29, but dexamethasone was associated with significantly more adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and severe or life-threatening adverse events. A more individually tailored choice of immunomodulation now appears possible, where side-effect profile, ease of administration, cost, and patient comorbidities can all be considered.

    Funding

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Complex With and Without Coinfections.
    (Open forum infectious diseases, 2022-08) Wang, Grace; Stapleton, Jack T; Baker, Arthur W; Rouphael, Nadine; Creech, C Buddy; El Sahly, Hana M; Stout, Jason E; Jackson, Lisa; Charbek, Edward; Leyva, Francisco J; Tomashek, Kay M; Tibbals, Melinda; Miller, Aaron; Frey, Sharon; Niemotka, Samson; Wiemken, Timothy L; Beydoun, Nour; Alaaeddine, Ghina; Turner, Nicholas; Walter, Emmanuel B; Chamberland, Robin; Abate, Getahun
    Coinfections are more common in patients with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Infiltrates on imaging studies are seen more commonly in patients with coinfections, but coinfections did not affect treatment outcomes of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus placebo to treat lower respiratory tract infections associated with low procalcitonin: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
    (The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2023-04) Tsalik, Ephraim L; Rouphael, Nadine G; Sadikot, Ruxana T; Rodriguez-Barradas, Maria C; McClain, Micah T; Wilkins, Dana M; Woods, Christopher W; Swamy, Geeta K; Walter, Emmanuel B; El Sahly, Hana M; Keitel, Wendy A; Mulligan, Mark J; Tuyishimire, Bonifride; Serti, Elisavet; Hamasaki, Toshimitsu; Evans, Scott R; Ghazaryan, Varduhi; Lee, Marina S; Lautenbach, Ebbing; TRAP-LRTI Study Group; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group

    Background

    Lower respiratory tract infections are frequently treated with antibiotics, despite a viral cause in many cases. It remains unknown whether low procalcitonin concentrations can identify patients with lower respiratory tract infection who are unlikely to benefit from antibiotics. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus placebo to treat lower respiratory tract infections in patients with low procalcitonin.

    Methods

    We conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at five health centres in the USA. Adults aged 18 years or older with clinically suspected non-pneumonia lower respiratory tract infection and symptom duration from 24 h to 28 days were eligible for enrolment. Participants with a procalcitonin concentration of 0·25 ng/mL or less were randomly assigned (1:1), in blocks of four with stratification by site, to receive over-encapsulated oral azithromycin 250 mg or matching placebo (two capsules on day 1 followed by one capsule daily for 4 days). Participants, non-study clinical providers, investigators, and study coordinators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo in terms of clinical improvement at day 5 in the intention-to-treat population. The non-inferiority margin was -12·5%. Solicited adverse events (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea, allergic reaction, or yeast infections) were recorded as a secondary outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03341273.

    Findings

    Between Dec 8, 2017, and March 9, 2020, 691 patients were assessed for eligibility and 499 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive azithromycin (n=249) or placebo (n=250). Clinical improvement at day 5 was observed in 148 (63%, 95% CI 54 to 71) of 238 participants with full data in the placebo group and 155 (69%, 61 to 77) of 227 participants with full data in the azithromycin group in the intention-to-treat analysis (between-group difference -6%, 95% CI -15 to 2). The 95% CI for the difference did not meet the non-inferiority margin. Solicited adverse events and the severity of solicited adverse events were not significantly different between groups at day 5, except for increased abdominal pain associated with azithromycin (47 [23%, 95% CI 18 to 29] of 204 participants) compared with placebo (35 [16%, 12 to 21] of 221; between-group difference -7% [95% CI -15 to 0]; p=0·066).

    Interpretation

    Placebo was not non-inferior to azithromycin in terms of clinical improvement at day 5 in adults with lower respiratory tract infection and a low procalcitonin concentration. After accounting for both the rates of clinical improvement and solicited adverse events at day 5, it is unclear whether antibiotics are indicated for patients with lower respiratory tract infection and a low procalcitonin concentration.

    Funding

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, bioMérieux.