Browsing by Author "Gage, Mark J"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A Solution to After-Hours Fatigue and Surgical Backlog.
    (Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2021-01) Anastasio, Albert T; Patel, Preet Shailesh; Fernandez-Moure, Joseph; Gage, Mark J
    After-hours surgery represents a novel solution that can effectively combat surgical fatigue of care teams in addition to addressing the high volume of surgical backlog associated with the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic. This commentary seeks to rationalize how successful employment of a dedicated after-hours surgical team and protocol has tremendous potential for increased efficiency while maintaining good surgical outcomes in patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparing the speed of irrigation between pulsatile lavage versus gravity irrigation: an Ex-vivo experimental investigation.
    (Patient Saf Surg, 2017) Mundy, Lily R; Gage, Mark J; Yoon, Richard S; Liporace, Frank A
    BACKGROUND: The need for reoperation or wound infection treatments between pulsatile and gravity irrigation are statistically equivalent, however, it is unclear which method maximizes operative efficiency and expeditious irrigation. In this study we set out to determine the differences in irrigation rate between these various treatment methods. METHODS: This was an ex-vivo experimental laboratory study not involving human subjects. Irrigation rates were tested based on the time in seconds required to empty a three-liter bag of normal saline hanging at either 6 or 9 ft. Three forms of irrigation were tested: gravity irrigation (GI6, GI9), low-pressure pulsatile irrigation (LP6, LP9) and high-pressure pulsatile irrigation. One-way ANOVA and Student's t-test were used to compare rates based on height and form of irrigation. RESULTS: Significant differences in irrigation rates were noted at 6 ft between all three forms of irrigation with gravity irrigation the fastest followed by high-pressure and low-pressure pulsatile irrigation (GI6, mean 142 s ± 3.2; HP6, mean 189 s ± 10.2; LP6, mean 323 s ± 22.5; p < 0.001). This difference was also found at 9 ft (GI9, mean 114 s ± 1.5; HP9, mean 186 s ± 10.5; LP9, mean 347 s ± 3.5; p < 0.001). Gravity irrigation was significantly faster (p < 0.001) at an increased height, whereas the high and low-pressure irrigation rates were unaffected by height. List price comparison found pulsatile irrigation to cost approximately 3.3 times more than gravity lavage. CONCLUSIONS: Gravity irrigation provided the most rapid rate of irrigation tested, regardless of the height. With existing literature demonstrating equivalent clinical outcomes between methods, gravity lavage offers a faster and potentially more cost-effective form of irrigation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Femoral malrotation after intramedullary nailing in obese versus non-obese patients.
    (Injury, 2014-07) Koerner, John D; Patel, Neeraj M; Yoon, Richard S; Gage, Mark J; Donegan, Derek J; Liporace, Frank A
    OBJECTIVE: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) of obese patients with femoral fractures can be difficult due to soft tissue considerations and overall body habitus. Complications including malrotation can occur and have significant impact on postoperative function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate femoral rotation after intramedullary nailing of obese and non-obese patients to see if there was a difference in rotation, complications and any risk factors for malrotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2009, 417 consecutive patients with femur fractures treated with IM nail at Level I trauma and tertiary referral center. Of these, 335 with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanogram of the bilateral lower extremities were included in this study. Baseline demographic, perioperative and postoperative femoral version calculations were included in the dataset. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test for categorical data, t-test for continuous data, and univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Of the 417 patients with femur fractures between 2000 and 2009, 335 met criteria for this study. There were 111 patients with a BMI <25, 129 with BMI 25-29.9, and 95 patients with a BMI >30. When BMI was categorised into 3 groups (<25, 25-29.9, or 30+), none of these groups were predictive of version in univariate or multivariate regressions. Among only obese patients (BMI 30+), BMI of 35+ was not a significant predictor of version when compared to BMI 30-34.9. There were no significant differences in femoral version based on entry point (antegrade vs. retrograde) in any BMI category. There were also no significant difference between groups of patients with a DFV of >15̊ (p=0.212). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, BMI did not have an effect on postoperative difference in femoral version. In fact, in our multivariate regression analysis, BMI of over 30 was actually predictive of significantly lower difference in femoral version. While other studies have documented the intraoperative difficulties encountered with obese patients with femur fractures, the outcome of femoral rotation is not affected by an increasing BMI.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures.
    (JSES international, 2021-03) Evans, Daniel R; Saltzman, Eliana B; Anastasio, Albert T; Guisse, Ndeye F; Belay, Elshaday S; Pidgeon, Tyler S; Richard, Marc J; Ruch, David S; Anakwenze, Oke A; Gage, Mark J; Klifto, Christopher S

    Hypothesis

    We hypothesized that the modified Fragility Index (mFI) would predict complications in patients older than 50 years who underwent operative intervention for a proximal humerus fracture.

    Methods

    We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database, including patients older than 50 years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture. A 5-item mFI score was then calculated for each patient. Postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates as well as length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariable statistical analyses were performed, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, LOS, and operative time.

    Results

    We identified 2,004 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range: 59-74), of which 76.2% were female. As mFI increased from 0 to 2 or greater, 30-day readmission rate increased from 2.8% to 6.7% (P-value = .005), rate of discharge to rehabilitation facility increased from 7.1% to 25.3% (P-value < .001), and rates of any complication increased from 6.5% to 13.9% (P-value < .001). Specifically, the rates of renal and hematologic complications increased significantly in patients with mFI of 2 or greater (P-value = .042 and P-value < .001, respectively). Compared with patients with mFI of 0, patients with mFI of 2 or greater were 2 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio = 2.2, P-value .026). In addition, patients with mFI of 2 or greater had an increased odds of discharge to a rehabilitation center (odds ratio = 2.3, P-value < .001). However, increased fragility was not significantly associated with an increased odds of 30-day reoperation or any complication after controlling for demographic data, LOS, and operative time.

    Conclusion

    An increasing level of fragility is predictive of readmission and discharge to a rehabilitation center after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Our data suggest that a simple fragility evaluation can help inform surgical decision-making and counseling in patients older than 50 years with proximal humerus fractures.