Browsing by Author "Hamilton, D Kojo"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 20 of 91
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A New Piece of the Puzzle to Understand Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Utilizing a Novel Angle δ to Describe the Relationship among T1 Vertebral Body Slope, Cervical Lordosis, and Cervical Sagittal Alignment.
    (Neurosurgery, 2020-03) Goldschmidt, Ezequiel; Angriman, Federico; Agarwal, Nitin; Trevisan, Marcos; Zhou, James; Chen, Katherine; Gerszten, Peter C; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Passias, Peter; Scheer, Justin; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Miller, Emily; Jain, Amit; Neuman, Brian; Sciubba, Daniel M; Burton, Douglas; Hamilton, D Kojo; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)
    Cervical alignment has become increasingly important in the planning of spine surgery. A relationship between the slope of T1 (T1S), the cervical lordosis (CL), and the overall cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) has previously been demonstrated, but the exact nature of this relationship is poorly understood. In this study, we derive theoretical and empirical equations to better understand how T1S and CL affect cSVA. The first equation was developed on a theoretical basis using inherent trigonometric relationships of the cervical spine. By treating the cervical spine as the arc of a circumference, and by taking into account the cervical height (CH), the geometric relationship between theT1S, CL, and cSVA was described via a trigonometric identity utilizing a novel angle δ subtended by the CH and cSVA (δ = T1S-CL/2). The second equation was developed on an empiric basis by performing a multiple linear regression on data obtained from a retrospective review of a large multicenter deformity database. The theoretical equation determined that the value of cSVA could be expressed as: $cSVA\ = \ CH*{\rm{tan}}( {\pi /180*( {T1S - CL/2} )} )$. The empirical equation determined that value of cSVA could be expressed as: $cSVA=({1.1*T1} )\ - ( {0.43*CL} ) + 6.69$. In both, the sagittal alignment of the head over the shoulders is directly proportional to the T1S and inversely proportional to CL/2. These 2 equations may allow surgeons to better understand how the CL compensates for the T1S, to accurately predict the postoperative cSVA, and to customize cervical interbody grafts by taking into consideration each individual patient's specific cervical spine parameters.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A Novel Tool for Deformity Surgery Planning: Determining the Magnitude of Lordotic Correction Required to Achieve a Desired Sagittal Vertical Axis.
    (World neurosurgery, 2017-08) Goldschmidt, Ezequiel; Angriman, Federico; Agarwal, Nitin; Zhou, James; Chen, Katherine; Tempel, Zachary J; Gerszten, Peter C; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Passias, Peter; Scheer, Justin; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Miller, Emily; Jain, Amit; Neuman, Brian; Sciubba, Daniel M; Burton, Douglas; Hamilton, D Kojo; International Spine Study Group

    Objective

    We sought to create a model capable of predicting the magnitude of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) correction necessary to achieve a desired change in sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

    Methods

    A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained multicenter adult spinal deformity database collected by the International Spine Study Group between 2009 and 2014. The independent variable of interest was the degree of correction achieved in the PI-LL mismatch 6 weeks after surgery. Primary outcome was the change in global sagittal alignment 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We used a linear mixed-effects model to determine the extent to which corrections in the PI-LL relationship affected postoperative changes in SVA.

    Results

    A total of 1053 adult patients were identified. Of these patients, 590 were managed surgically. Eighty-seven surgically managed patients were excluded because of incomplete or missing PI-LL measurements on follow-up; the remaining 503 patients were selected for inclusion. For each degree of improvement in the PI-LL mismatch at 6 weeks, the SVA decreased by 2.18 mm (95% confidence interval, -2.56, -1.79; P < 0.01) and 1.67 mm (95% confidence interval, -2.07, -1.27; P < 0.01) at 6 weeks and 12 months, respectively. A high SVA measurement (>50 mm) 1 year after surgery was negatively associated with health-related quality of life as measured by the Scoliosis Research Society 22 outcomes assessment.

    Conclusions

    We describe a novel model that shows how surgical correction of the PI-LL relationship affects postoperative changes in SVA. This model may enable surgeons to determine preoperatively the amount of LL necessary to achieve a desired change in SVA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Have Higher Baseline Frailty, Disability, and Comorbidities Compared With Complex Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study of 616 Patients.
    (Global spine journal, 2023-11) Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Ben-Israel, David; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khal; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Eastlack, Robert; Daniels, Alan; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Burton, Douglas; Ames, Christopher P; Bess, Shay; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Multicenter comparative cohort.

    Objective

    Studies have shown markedly higher rates of complications and all-cause mortality following surgery for adult cervical deformity (ACD) compared with adult thoracolumbar deformity (ATLD), though the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Our objectives were to compare baseline frailty, disability, and comorbidities between ACD and complex ATLD patients undergoing surgery.

    Methods

    Two multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity registries were queried, one ATLD and one ACD. Baseline clinical and frailty measures were compared between the cohorts.

    Results

    616 patients were identified (107 ACD and 509 ATLD). These groups had similar mean age (64.6 vs 60.8 years, respectively, P = .07). ACD patients were less likely to be women (51.9% vs 69.5%, P < .001) and had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.5 vs .9, P < .001) and ASA grade (2.7 vs 2.4, P < .001). ACD patients had worse VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS, 25.7 vs 29.9, P < .001) and PROMIS Physical Function Score (33.3 vs 35.3, P = .031). All frailty measures were significantly worse for ACD patients, including hand dynamometer (44.6 vs 55.6 lbs, P < .001), CSHA Clinical Frailty Score (CFS, 4.0 vs 3.2, P < .001), and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS, 5.15 vs 3.21, P < .001). Greater proportions of ACD patients were frail (22.9% vs 5.7%) or vulnerable (15.6% vs 10.9%) based on EFS (P < .001).

    Conclusions

    Compared with ATLD patients, ACD patients had worse baseline characteristics on all measures assessed (comorbidities/disability/frailty). These differences may help account for greater risk of complications and all-cause mortality previously observed in ACD patients and facilitate strategies for better preoperative optimization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analysis of Successful Versus Failed Radiographic Outcomes After Cervical Deformity Surgery.
    (Spine, 2018-07) Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Ramchandran, Subaraman; Hamilton, D Kojo; Sciubba, Daniel; Passias, Peter G; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Hart, Robert A; Gupta, Munish; Burton, Douglas; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Study design

    Prospective multicenter cohort study with consecutive enrollment.

    Objective

    To evaluate preoperative alignment and surgical factors associated with suboptimal early postoperative radiographic outcomes after surgery for cervical deformity.

    Summary of background data

    Recent studies have demonstrated correlation between cervical sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcomes. Few studies have explored cervical deformity correction prospectively, and the factors that result in successful versus failed cervical alignment corrections remain unclear.

    Methods

    Patients with adult cervical deformity (ACD) included with either cervical kyphosis more than 10°, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of more than 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle of more than 25°. Patients were categorized into failed outcomes group if cSVA of more than 4 cm or T1 slope and cervical lordosis (TS-CL) of more than 20° at 6 months postoperatively.

    Results

    A total of 71 patients with ACD (mean age 62 yr, 56% women, 41% revisions) were included. Fourty-five had primary cervical deformities and 26 at the cervico-thoracic junction. Thirty-three (46.4%) had failed radiographic outcomes by cSVA and 46 (64.7%) by TS-CL. Failure to restore cSVA was associated with worse preoperative C2 pelvic tilt angle (CPT: 64.4° vs. 47.8°, P = 0.01), worse postoperative C2 slope (35.0° vs. 23.8°, P = 0.004), TS-CL (35.2° vs. 24.9°, P = 0.01), CPT (47.9° vs. 28.2°, P < 0.001), "+" Schwab modifiers (P = 0.007), revision surgery (P = 0.05), and failure to address the secondary, thoracolumbar driver of the deformity (P = 0.02). Failure to correct TS-CL was associated with worse preoperative cervical kyphosis (10.4° vs. -2.1°, P = 0.03), CPT (52.6° vs. 39.1°, P = 0.04), worse postoperative C2 slope (30.2° vs. 13.3°, P < 0.001), cervical lordosis (-3.6° vs. -15.1°, P = 0.01), and CPT (37.7° vs. 24.0°, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperative distal junctional kyphosis associated with suboptimal outcomes by cSVA (odds ratio 0.06, confidence interval 0.01-0.4, P = 0.004) and TS-CL (odds ratio 0.15, confidence interval 0.02-0.97, P = 0.05).

    Conclusion

    Factors associated with failure to correct the cSVA included revision surgery, worse preoperative CPT, and concurrent thoracolumbar deformity. Failure to correct the TS-CL mismatch was associated with worse preoperative cervical kyphosis and CPT. Occurrence of early postoperative distal junctional kyphosis significantly affects postoperative radiographic outcomes.

    Level of evidence

    3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?
    (JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024) Mullin, Jeffrey P; Soliman, Mohamed AR; Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter G; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khaled; Eastlack, Robert K; Daniels, Alan H; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish C; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-03) Mullin, Jeffrey P; Soliman, Mohamed AR; Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter G; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khaled; Eastlack, Robert K; Daniels, Alan H; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish C; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas

    Objective

    Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors.

    Methods

    Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA.

    Results

    Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications.

    Conclusions

    Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Are insufficient corrections a major factor in distal junctional kyphosis? A simulated analysis of cervical deformity correction using in-construct measurements.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-05) Ani, Fares; Sissman, Ethan; Woo, Dainn; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert K; Smith, Justin S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Kim, Han Jo; Daniels, Alan H; Klineberg, Eric O; Neuman, Brian; Sciubba, Daniel M; Gupta, Munish C; Kebaish, Khaled M; Passias, Peter G; Hart, Robert A; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Ames, Christopher P; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S

    Objective

    The present study utilized recently developed in-construct measurements in simulations of cervical deformity surgery in order to assess undercorrection and predict distal junctional kyphosis (DJK).

    Methods

    A retrospective review of a database of operative cervical deformity patients was analyzed for severe DJK and mild DJK. C2-lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) sagittal angle (SA) was measured postoperatively, and the correction was simulated in the preoperative radiograph in order to match the C2-LIV by using the planning software. Linear regression analysis that used C2 pelvic angle (CPA) and pelvic tilt (PT) determined the simulated PT that matched the virtual CPA. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA that corresponded to DJK of 20° and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of 40 mm.

    Results

    Sixty-nine cervical deformity patients were included. Severe and mild DJK occurred in 11 (16%) and 22 (32%) patients, respectively; 3 (4%) required DJK revision. Simulated corrections demonstrated that severe and mild DJK patients had worse alignment compared to non-DJK patients in terms of cSVA (42.5 mm vs 33.0 mm vs 23.4 mm, p < 0.001) and C2-LIV SVA (68.9 mm vs 57.3 mm vs 36.8 mm, p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed the relationships between in-construct measures (C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA), cSVA, and change in DJK (all R > 0.57, p < 0.001). A cSVA of 40 mm corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 10.4° and C2-T10 SA of 28.0°. A DJK angle change of 10° corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 5.8° and C2-T10 SA of 20.1°.

    Conclusions

    Simulated cervical deformity corrections demonstrated that severe DJK patients have insufficient corrections compared to patients without DJK. In-construct measures assess sagittal alignment within the fusion separate from DJK and subjacent compensation. They can be useful as intraoperative tools to gauge the adequacy of cervical deformity correction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Artificial intelligence clustering of adult spinal deformity sagittal plane morphology predicts surgical characteristics, alignment, and outcomes.
    (European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021-08) Durand, Wesley M; Lafage, Renaud; Hamilton, D Kojo; Passias, Peter G; Kim, Han Jo; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Gupta, Munish; Kelly, Michael P; Klineberg, Eric O; Schwab, Frank; Gum, Jeffrey L; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert; Kebaish, Khaled; Soroceanu, Alex; Hostin, Richard A; Burton, Doug; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher; Hart, Robert A; Daniels, Alan H; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Purpose

    AI algorithms have shown promise in medical image analysis. Previous studies of ASD clusters have analyzed alignment metrics-this study sought to complement these efforts by analyzing images of sagittal anatomical spinopelvic landmarks. We hypothesized that an AI algorithm would cluster preoperative lateral radiographs into groups with distinct morphology.

    Methods

    This was a retrospective review of a multicenter, prospectively collected database of adult spinal deformity. A total of 915 patients with adult spinal deformity and preoperative lateral radiographs were included. A 2 × 3, self-organizing map-a form of artificial neural network frequently employed in unsupervised classification tasks-was developed. The mean spine shape was plotted for each of the six clusters. Alignment, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were compared.

    Results

    Qualitatively, clusters C and D exhibited only mild sagittal plane deformity. Clusters B, E, and F, however, exhibited marked positive sagittal balance and loss of lumbar lordosis. Cluster A had mixed characteristics, likely representing compensated deformity. Patients in clusters B, E, and F disproportionately underwent 3-CO. PJK and PJF were particularly prevalent among clusters A and E. Among clusters B and F, patients who experienced PJK had significantly greater positive sagittal balance than those who did not.

    Conclusions

    This study clustered preoperative lateral radiographs of ASD patients into groups with highly distinct overall spinal morphology and association with sagittal alignment parameters, baseline HRQOL, and surgical characteristics. The relationship between SVA and PJK differed by cluster. This study represents significant progress toward incorporation of computer vision into clinically relevant classification systems in adult spinal deformity.

    Level of evidence iv

    Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Assessment of a Novel Adult Cervical Deformity Frailty Index as a Component of Preoperative Risk Stratification.
    (World neurosurgery, 2018-01) Miller, Emily K; Ailon, Tamir; Neuman, Brian J; Klineberg, Eric O; Mundis, Gregory M; Sciubba, Daniel M; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lafage, Virginie; Scheer, Justin K; Smith, Justin S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group
    To determine the value of a novel adult cervical deformity frailty index (CD-FI) in preoperative risk stratification.We reviewed a prospective, multicenter database of adults with cervical spine deformity. We selected 40 variables to construct the CD-FI using a validated method. Patients were categorized as not frail (NF) (<0.2), frail (0.2-0.4), or severely frail (SF) (>0.4) according to CD-FI score. We performed multivariate logistic regression to determine the relationships between CD-FI score and incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition.Of 61 patients enrolled from 2009 to 2015 with at least 1 year of follow-up, the mean CD-FI score was 0.26 (range 0.25-0.59). Seventeen patients were categorized as NF, 34 as frail, and 10 as SF. The incidence of major complications increased with greater frailty, with a gamma correlation coefficient of 0.25 (asymptotic standard error, 0.22). The odds of having a major complication were greater for frail patients (odds ratio 4.4; 95% confidence interval 0.6-32) and SF patients (odds ratio 43; 95% confidence interval 2.7-684) compared with NF patients. Greater frailty was associated with a greater incidence of medical complications and had a gamma correlation coefficient of 0.30 (asymptotic standard error, 0.26). Surgical complications, discharge disposition, and length of hospital stay did not correlate significantly with frailty.Greater frailty was associated with greater risk of major complications for patients undergoing cervical spine deformity surgery. The CD-FI may be used to improve the accuracy of preoperative risk stratification and allow for adequate patient counseling.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Assessment of Surgical Treatment Strategies for Moderate to Severe Cervical Spinal Deformity Reveals Marked Variation in Approaches, Osteotomies, and Fusion Levels.
    (World neurosurgery, 2016-07) Smith, Justin S; Klineberg, Eric; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Lafage, Virginie; Schwab, Frank J; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Scheer, Justin K; Ailon, Tamir; Ramachandran, Subaraman; Daniels, Alan; Mundis, Gregory; Gupta, Munish; Hostin, Richard; Deviren, Vedat; Eastlack, Robert; Passias, Peter; Hamilton, D Kojo; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas C; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Objective

    Although previous reports suggest that surgery can improve the pain and disability of cervical spinal deformity (CSD), techniques are not standardized. Our objective was to assess for consensus on recommended surgical plans for CSD treatment.

    Methods

    Eighteen CSD cases were assembled, including a clinical vignette, cervical imaging (radiography, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), and full-length standing radiography. Fourteen deformity surgeons (10 orthopedic, 4 neurosurgery) were queried regarding recommended surgical plans.

    Results

    There was marked variation in treatment plans across all deformity types. Even for the least complex deformities (moderate midcervical apex kyphosis), there was lack of agreement on approach (50% combined anterior-posterior, 25% anterior only, 25% posterior only), number of anterior (range, 2-6) and posterior (range, 4-16) fusion levels, and types of osteotomies. As the kyphosis apex moved caudally (cervical-thoracic junction/upper thoracic spine) and for cases with chin-on-chest kyphosis, >80% of surgeons agreed on a posterior-only approach and >70% recommended a pedicle subtraction osteotomy or vertebral column resection, but the range in number of anterior (4-8) and posterior (4-27) fusion levels was exceptionally broad. Cases of cervical/cervical-thoracic scoliosis had the least agreement for approach (48% posterior only, 33% combined anterior-posterior, 17% anterior-posterior-anterior or posterior-anterior-posterior, 2% anterior only) and had broad variation in the number of anterior (2-5) and posterior (6-19) fusion levels, and recommended osteotomies (41% pedicle subtraction osteotomy/vertebral column resection).

    Conclusions

    Among a panel of deformity surgeons, there was marked lack of consensus on recommended surgical approach, osteotomies, and fusion levels for CSD. Further study is warranted to assess whether specific surgical treatment approaches are associated with better outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    C-2 neurectomy during atlantoaxial instrumented fusion in the elderly: patient satisfaction and surgical outcome.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2011-07) Hamilton, D Kojo; Smith, Justin S; Sansur, Charles A; Dumont, Aaron S; Shaffrey, Christopher I

    Objective

    The originally described technique of atlantoaxial stabilization using C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pars screws includes a C-2 neurectomy to provide adequate hemostasis and visualization for screw placement, enable adequate joint decortication and arthrodesis, and prevent new-onset postoperative C-2 neuralgia. However, inclusion of a C-2 neurectomy for this procedure remains controversial, likely due in part to a lack of studies that have specifically addressed whether it affects patient outcome. The authors' objective was to assess the surgical and clinical impact of routine C-2 neurectomy performed with C1-2 segmental instrumented arthrodesis in a consecutive series of elderly patients with C1-2 instability.

    Methods

    Forty-four consecutive patients (mean age 71 years) underwent C1-2 instrumented fusion, including C-1 lateral mass screw insertion. Bilateral C-2 neurectomies were performed. Standardized clinical assessments were performed both pre- and postoperatively. Numbness or discomfort in a C-2 distribution was documented at follow-up. Fusion was assessed using the Lenke fusion grade.

    Results

    Among all 44 patients, mean blood loss was 200 ml (range 100-350 ml) and mean operative time was 129 minutes (range 87-240 minutes). There were no intraoperative complications, and no patients reported new postoperative onset or worsening of C-2 neuralgia postoperatively. Outcomes for the 30 patients with a minimum 13-month follow-up (range 13-72 months) were assessed. At a mean follow-up of 36 months, Nurick grade and pain numeric rating scale scores improved from 3.7 to 1.0 (p < 0.001) and 9.4 to 0.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean postoperative Neck Disability Index score was 7.3%. The fusion rate was 97%, and the patient satisfaction rate was 93%. All 24 patients with preoperative occipital neuralgia reported relief. Seventeen patients noticed C-2 distribution numbness only during examination in the clinic, and 2 patients reported C-2 numbness, but it did not affect their daily function.

    Conclusions

    In this series of C1-2 instrumented arthrodesis in elderly patients, excellent fusion rates were achieved, and patient satisfaction was not negatively affected by C-2 neurectomy. In the authors' experience, C-2 neurectomy enhanced surgical exposure of the C1-2 joint, thereby facilitating hemostasis, placement of instrumentation, and decortication of the joint space for arthrodesis. Importantly, with C-2 neurectomy in the present series, no cases of new onset postoperative C-2 neuralgia occurred, in contrast to a growing number of reports in the literature documenting new-onset C-2 neuralgia without C-2 neurectomy. On the contrary, 80% of patients in the present series had preoperative occipital neuralgia and in all of these patients this neuralgia was relieved following C1-2 instrumented arthrodesis with C-2 neurectomy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Calibration of a comprehensive predictive model for the development of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity patients with consideration of contemporary goals and techniques.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-06) Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Hamilton, D Kojo; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory; Nunley, Pierce D; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence; Hostin, Richard; Gupta, Munish C; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Kim, Han Jo; Lafage, Virginie; Passias, Peter G

    Objective

    The objective of this study was to calibrate an updated predictive model incorporating novel clinical, radiographic, and prophylactic measures to assess the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF).

    Methods

    Operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and baseline and 2-year postoperative data were included. PJK was defined as ≥ 10° in sagittal Cobb angle between the inferior uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) endplate and superior endplate of the UIV + 2 vertebrae. PJF was radiographically defined as a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle ≥ 15° with the presence of structural failure and/or mechanical instability, or PJK with reoperation. Backstep conditional binary supervised learning models assessed baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical information to predict the occurrence of PJK and PJF. Internal cross validation of the model was performed via a 70%/30% cohort split. Conditional inference tree analysis determined thresholds at an alpha level of 0.05.

    Results

    Seven hundred seventy-nine patients with ASD (mean 59.87 ± 14.24 years, 78% female, mean BMI 27.78 ± 6.02 kg/m2, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.74 ± 1.71) were included. PJK developed in 50.2% of patients, and 10.5% developed PJF by their last recorded visit. The six most significant demographic, radiographic, surgical, and postoperative predictors of PJK/PJF were baseline age ≥ 74 years, baseline sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) T1 pelvic angle modifier > 1, baseline SAAS pelvic tilt modifier > 0, levels fused > 10, nonuse of prophylaxis measures, and 6-week SAAS pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis modifier > 1 (all p < 0.015). Overall, the model was deemed significant (p < 0.001), and internally validated receiver operating characteristic analysis returned an area under the curve of 0.923, indicating robust model fit.

    Conclusions

    PJK and PJF remain critical concerns in ASD surgery, and efforts to reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF have resulted in the development of novel prophylactic techniques and enhanced clinical and radiographic selection criteria. This study demonstrates a validated model incorporating such techniques that may allow for the prediction of clinically significant PJK and PJF, and thus assist in optimizing patient selection, enhancing intraoperative decision making, and reducing postoperative complications in ASD surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Cause and Effect of Revisions in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multicenter Study on Outcomes Based on Etiology.
    (The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2024-12) Passias, Peter G; Dave, Pooja; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Renaud; Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O; Tretiakov, Peter; Mir, Jamshaid; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Eastlack, Robert; Hamilton, D Kojo; Chou, Dean; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Lenke, Lawrence G; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Bess, Shay; Hostin, Robert; Burton, Douglas C

    Background context

    While the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increasingly favored surgical correction, the incidence of revision surgery remains high. Yet, little has been explored on the association between the etiology of reoperation and patient outcomes.

    Purpose

    To assess the impact of the etiology of revision surgery on postoperative outcomes.

    Study design/setting

    Retrospective cohort analysis.

    Patient sample

    891 ASD patients.

    Outcome measures

    Complications, radiographic parameters, disability metrics.

    Methods

    Operative ASD patients with at least 1 revision stratified by etiology (mechanical [Mech] -pseudoarthrosis, thoracic decompensation without junctional failure, x-ray malalignment, implant failure, implant malposition, PJK ± major malalignment; infection [Infx]-early vs late onset, major vs minor; wound [Wound]; SI pain [SI Pain]). Excluded multiple etiologies, and intraoperative or medical complications. Data from the immediate visit prior to the final revision was used as baseline (rBL). Follow-up based on visits best aligned to time points after final revision. Radiographic parameters SVA, PI-LL, and PT were used to assess alignment post-revision via ANOVA. Multivariate analysis controlling for relevant covariates assessed outcome differences after final revision surgery.

    Results

    891 MET INCLUSION (AGE: 60.40±14.17, 77% F, BMI: 27.97±5.87 KG/M2, CCI: : 1.80±1.73). Etiology groups were as follows: Mech: 432; Infx: 296; Wound: 65; SI Pain: 98. Surgically, Infx had lower rates of osteotomy, interbody fusion, and decompression (p<.05). Infx and SI Pain demonstrated similar correction in radiographics SVA, PI-LL, and PT (p>.05), whereas Mech had significantly less improvement by 2 years (p<.003) that improved by 5 years. Compared to without revision, the odds of MCID in ODI were 48.6% lower across groups (OR: 0.514 [.280, .945], p=.032). Indications of x-ray malalignment were 93.0% less likely to reach MCID (OR: 0.071, [.006, .866], p=.038). Similarly, implant failure negatively impacted rates of MCID (40% vs. 15.2%, p=.029). Those with PJK had 57% lower odds of MCID (33% vs 54%, OR: .43, [0.2, 0.9] p= 0.023), further negated by major malalignment (OR: 0.05, [.07, .97], p=.02). Indications of pseudarthrosis, thoracic decompensation, implant malposition were not significant. Major sepsis had lower rates of MCID compared to minor (6.4% vs. 21.2%), and early onset infection improved compared to late (OR: 1.43, [1.17, 2.98], p<.001). In the early follow-up period, the Mech group has significantly worse SRS Pain and Mental Health scores compared to other groups (1-year: Mech 1.56 vs Infx 0.83 vs SI Pain 0.72, p<0.001; 2-year: 1.88 vs 0.71 vs 0.76, p=0.034). Complication rates increased with the number of revisions and with mechanical indication (all p<.05). At 5 years, patient satisfaction was significantly more likely to improve compared to early follow-up (OR: 1.22, p=.011), along with improved pain score, in Mech group (0.89 vs 0.49 vs 0.56, p=.081).

    Conclusions

    This study focused on the impact of revision as it varies with etiology and time of occurrence postoperatively. Compared to other etiologies, revision surgery due to mechanical complications had less radiographic improvement and worsening patient-reported scores in the early postoperative period despite stabilization at 5 years. The depth of impact of mechanical complication, particularly with the addition of malalignment, merits greater focus during surgical planning.

    Level of evidence

    III.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical and radiographic presentation and treatment of patients with cervical deformity secondary to thoracolumbar proximal junctional kyphosis are distinct despite achieving similar outcomes: Analysis of 123 prospective CD cases.
    (Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2018-10) Passias, Peter G; Horn, Samantha R; Poorman, Gregory W; Daniels, Alan H; Hamilton, D Kojo; Kim, Han Jo; Diebo, Bassel G; Steinmetz, Leah; Bortz, Cole A; Segreto, Frank A; Sciubba, Daniel M; Smith, Justin S; Neuman, Brian J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Ames, Christopher; Hart, Robert; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert K; Schwab, Frank J; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)
    CD development secondary to PJK was recently documented in adult spinal deformity patients after surgical correction for thoracolumbar ASD. This study analyzes surgical management of patients with CD secondary to proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) versus patients with primary CD. Retrospective review of multicenter cervical deformity (CD) database. CD defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7 coronal Cobb > 10°, cervical lordosis (CL) > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4cm, CBVA > 25°. Patients were grouped into those with PJK (UIV +2 < -10°) prior to cervical surgery versus who don't (Non-PJK). Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests compared radiographic, clinical, and surgical metrics between PJK and non-PJK groups. Of 123 eligible CD patients, 26(21.1%) had radiographic PJK prior to cervical surgery. PJK patients had significantly greater T2-T12 thoracic kyphosis (-58.8° vs -45.0°, p = 0.002), cSVA (49.1 mm vs 38.9 mm, p = 0.020), T1 Slope (42.6° vs 28.4°, p < 0.001), TS-CL (44.1° vs 35.6°, p = 0.048), C2-T3 SVA (98.8 mm vs 75.8 mm, p = 0.015), C2 Slope (45.4° vs 36.0°, p = 0.043), and CTPA (6.4° vs 4.6°, p = 0.005). Comparing their surgeries, the PJK group had significantly more levels fused (10.7 vs 7.4, p = 0.01). There was significantly greater blood loss in PJK patients (1158 ± 1063vs 738 ± 793 cc, p = 0.028); operative time, surgical approach, and BMP-2 use were similar (all p > 0.05). PJK patients experienced higher rates of complications 30 and 90 days post-operatively (23.1% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.004; 30.8% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.026), and more instrumentation failure 30 days postoperatively (7.8% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.004). Patients with cervical deformity secondary to PJK had worse baseline CD, despite no differences in HRQL or demographics. Surgical correction of CD associated with PJK required more invasive surgery and had higher complication rates than non-PJK patients, despite achieving similar clinical outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparative analysis of perioperative complications between a multicenter prospective cervical deformity database and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    (The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2017-11) Passias, Peter G; Horn, Samantha R; Jalai, Cyrus M; Poorman, Gregory; Bono, Olivia J; Ramchandran, Subaraman; Smith, Justin S; Scheer, Justin K; Sciubba, Daniel M; Hamilton, D Kojo; Mundis, Gregory; Oh, Cheongeun; Klineberg, Eric O; Lafage, Virginie; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Background context

    Complication rates for adult cervical deformity are poorly characterized given the complexity and heterogeneity of cases.

    Purpose

    To compare perioperative complication rates following adult cervical deformity corrective surgery between a prospective multicenter database for patients with cervical deformity (PCD) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).

    Study design/setting

    Retrospective review of prospective databases.

    Patient sample

    A total of 11,501 adult patients with cervical deformity (11,379 patients from the NIS and 122 patients from the PCD database).

    Outcome measures

    Perioperative medical and surgical complications.

    Methods

    The NIS was queried (2001-2013) for cervical deformity discharges for patients ≥18 years undergoing cervical fusions using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding. Patients ≥18 years from the PCD database (2013-2015) were selected. Equivalent complications were identified and rates were compared. Bonferroni correction (p<.004) was used for Pearson chi-square. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in complication rates between databases.

    Results

    A total of 11,379 patients from the NIS database and 122 patiens from the PCD database were identified. Patients from the PCD database were older (62.49 vs. 55.15, p<.001) but displayed similar gender distribution. Intraoperative complication rate was higher in the PCD (39.3%) group than in the NIS (9.2%, p<.001) database. The PCD database had an increased risk of reporting overall complications than the NIS (odds ratio: 2.81, confidence interval: 1.81-4.38). Only device-related complications were greater in the NIS (7.1% vs. 1.1%, p=.007). Patients from the PCD database displayed higher rates of the following complications: peripheral vascular (0.8% vs. 0.1%, p=.001), gastrointestinal (GI) (2.5% vs. 0.2%, p<.001), infection (8.2% vs. 0.5%, p<.001), dural tear (4.1% vs. 0.6%, p<.001), and dysphagia (9.8% vs. 1.9%, p<.001). Genitourinary, wound, and deep veinthrombosis (DVT) complications were similar between databases (p>.004). Based on surgicalapproach, the PCD reported higher GI and neurologic complication rates for combined anterior-posterior procedures (p<.001). For posterior-only procedures, the NIS had more device-related complications (12.4% vs. 0.1%, p=.003), whereas PCD had more infections (9.3% vs. 0.7%, p<.001).

    Conclusions

    Analysis of the surgeon-maintained cervical database revealed higher overall and individual complication rates and higher data granularity. The nationwide database may underestimate complications of patients with adult cervical deformity (ACD) particularly in regard to perioperative surgical details owing to coding and deformity generalizations. The surgeon-maintained database captures the surgical details, but may underestimate some medical complications.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery
    (Global Spine Journal, 2019-05-01) Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Lafage, Renaud; Mundis, Gregory M; Klineberg, Eric; Lafage, Virginie; Schwab, Frank J; Scheer, Justin K; Kelly, Michael; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish; Deviren, Vedat; Hostin, Richard; Albert, Todd; Riew, K Daniel; Hart, Robert; Burton, Doug; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P
    Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Factors that predict outcomes for adult cervical spine deformity (ACSD) have not been well defined. To compare ACSD patients with best versus worst outcomes. Methods: This study was based on a prospective, multicenter observational ACSD cohort. Best versus worst outcomes were compared based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NP-NRS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores. Results: Of 111 patients, 80 (72%) had minimum 1-year follow-up. For NDI, compared with best outcome patients (n = 28), worst outcome patients (n = 32) were more likely to have had a major complication (P =.004) and to have undergone a posterior-only procedure (P =.039), had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (P =.009), and had worse postoperative C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P =.027). For NP-NRS, compared with best outcome patients (n = 26), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were younger (P =.045), had worse baseline NP-NRS (P =.034), and were more likely to have had a minor complication (P =.030). For the mJOA, compared with best outcome patients (n = 16), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were more likely to have had a major complication (P =.007) and to have a better baseline mJOA (P =.030). Multivariate models for NDI included posterior-only surgery (P =.006), major complication (P =.002), and postoperative C7-S1 SVA (P =.012); models for NP-NRS included baseline NP-NRS (P =.009), age (P =.017), and posterior-only surgery (P =.038); and models for mJOA included major complication (P =.008). Conclusions: Factors distinguishing best and worst ACSD surgery outcomes included patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. These findings suggest areas that may warrant greater awareness to optimize patient counseling and outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Contemporary utilization of three-column osteotomy techniques in a prospective complex spinal deformity multicenter database: implications on full-body alignment and perioperative course.
    (Spine deformity, 2024-06) Williamson, Tyler K; Mir, Jamshaid M; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Demetriades, Andreas K; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Klineberg, Eric O; Bess, Shay; Passias, Peter G; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    Research has focused on the increased correction from a three-column osteotomy (3CO) during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, an in-depth analysis on the performance of a 3CO in a cohort of complex spinal deformity cases has not been described.

    Study design/setting

    This is a retrospective study on a prospectively enrolled, complex ASD database.

    Purpose

    This study aimed to determine if three-column osteotomies demonstrate superior benefit in correction of complex sagittal deformity at the cost of increased perioperative complications.

    Methods

    Surgical complex adult spinal deformity patients were included and grouped into thoracolumbar 3COs compared to those who did not have a 3CO (No 3CO) (remaining cohort). Rigid deformity was defined as ΔLL less than 33% from standing to supine. Severe deformity was defined as global (SVA > 70 mm) or C7-PL > 70 mm, or lumbopelvic (PI-LL > 30°). Means comparison tests assessed correction by 3CO grade/location. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity evaluated outcomes up to six weeks compared to No 3CO.

    Results

    648 patients were included (Mean age 61 ± 14.6 years, BMI 27.55 ± 5.8 kg/m2, levels fused: 12.6 ± 3.8). 126 underwent 3CO, a 20% higher usage than historical cohorts. 3COs were older, frail, and more likely to undergo revision (OR 5.2, 95% CI [2.6-10.6]; p < .001). 3COs were more likely to present with both severe global/lumbopelvic deformity (OR 4), 62.4% being rigid. 3COs had greater use of secondary rods (OR 4st) and incurred 4 times greater risk for: massive blood loss (> 3500 mL), longer LOS, SICU admission, perioperative wound and spine-related complications, and neurologic complications when performed below L3. 3COs had similar HRQL benefit, but higher perioperative opioid use. Mean segmental correction increased by grade (G3-21; G4-24; G5-27) and was 4 × greater than low-grade osteotomies, especially below L3 (OR 12). 3COs achieved 2 × greater spinopelvic correction. Higher grades properly distributed lordosis 50% of the time except L5. Pelvic compensation and non-response were relieved more often with increasing grade, with greater correction in all lower extremity parameters (p < .01). Due to the increased rate of complications, 3COs trended toward higher perioperative cost ($42,806 vs. $40,046, p = .086).

    Conclusion

    Three-column osteotomy usage in contemporary complex spinal deformities is generally limited to more disabled individuals undergoing the most severe sagittal and coronal realignment procedures. While there is an increased perioperative cost and prolongation of length of stay with usage, these techniques represent the most powerful realignment techniques available with a dramatic impact on normalization at operative levels and reciprocal changes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Anterior/Posterior Staged vs. Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    (Spine, 2023-07) Passias, Peter G; Ahmad, Waleed; Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Line, Breton; Daniels, Alan; Mir, Jamshaid M; Gupta, Munish; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert; Nunley, Pierce; Hamilton, D Kojo; Hostin, Richard; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Ames, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Bess, Shay; Klineberg, Eric O; International Spine Study Group

    Studydesign

    Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multi-center adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    To compare staged procedures to same-day interventions and identify the optimal time interval between staged surgeries for treatment of ASD.

    Background

    Surgical intervention for ASD is invasive and complex procedure that surgeons often elect to perform on different days (staging). Yet, there remains a paucity of literature on the timing and effects of the interval between stages.

    Methods

    ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data undergoing an anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion to the ilium were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for number of levels fused, number of interbody devices, surgical approaches, number of osteotomies/three-column osteotomy (3CO), frailty, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), revisions, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and UIV to create balanced cohorts of Same-Day and Staged surgical patients. Staged patients were stratified by intervening time-period between surgeries, using quartiles.

    Results

    176 PSM patients were included. Median interval between A/P staged procedures was 3 days. Staged patients had greater operative time and lower ICU stays postop (P<0.05). At 2Y, staged compared to same day showed a greater improvement in T1 slope - cervical lordosis (TS-CL), C2 sacral slope (C2SS), and SRS-Schwab SVA (P<0.05). Staged patients had higher rates of minimal clinically-important difference (MCID) for 1Y SRS-Appearance and 2Y physical component summary (PCS) scores. Assessing different intervals of staging, patients at the 75th percentile interval showed greater improvement in 1Y SRS Pain and Total postop as well as SRS Activity, Pain, Satisfaction, and Total scores (P<0.05) compared to patients in lower quartiles. Compared to the 25th percentile, patients reaching the 50th percentile interval were associated with increased odds of improvement in Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score proportionality (9.3[1.6-53.2], P=0.01).

    Conclusions

    This investigation is among the first to compare multicenter staged and same day surgery anterior/posterior adult spinal deformity patients fused to ilium using propensity-matching. Staged procedures resulted in significant improvement radiographically, reduced ICU admissions, and superior patient reported outcomes compared to same day procedures. An interval of at least three days between staged procedures is associated with superior outcomes in terms of GAP score proportionality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.
    (Neurosurgical focus, 2017-12) Poorman, Gregory W; Passias, Peter G; Horn, Samantha R; Frangella, Nicholas J; Daniels, Alan H; Hamilton, D Kojo; Kim, Hanjo; Sciubba, Daniel; Diebo, Bassel G; Bortz, Cole A; Segreto, Frank A; Kelly, Michael P; Smith, Justin S; Neuman, Brian J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; LaFage, Virginie; LaFage, Renaud; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert; Mundis, Gregory M; Eastlack, Robert; International Spine Study Group
    OBJECTIVE Depression and anxiety have been demonstrated to have negative impacts on outcomes after spine surgery. In patients with cervical deformity (CD), the psychological and physiological burdens of the disease may overlap without clear boundaries. While surgery has a proven record of bringing about significant pain relief and decreased disability, the impact of depression and anxiety on recovery from cervical deformity corrective surgery has not been previously reported on in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of depression and anxiety on patients' recovery from and improvement after CD surgery. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter CD database. Patients with a history of clinical depression, in addition to those with current self-reported anxiety or depression, were defined as depressed (D group). The D group was compared with nondepressed patients (ND group) with a similar baseline deformity determined by propensity score matching of the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). Baseline demographic, comorbidity, clinical, and radiographic data were compared among patients using t-tests. Improvement of symptoms was recorded at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. All health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores collected at these follow-up time points were compared using t-tests. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were matched for baseline radiographic parameters: 33 with a history of depression and/or current depression, and 33 without. Depressed patients had similar age, sex, race, and radiographic alignment: cSVA, T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis, SVA, and T-1 pelvic angle (p > 0.05). Compared with nondepressed individuals, depressed patients had a higher incidence of osteoporosis (21.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.028), rheumatoid arthritis (18.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.012), and connective tissue disorders (18.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.012). At baseline, the D group had greater neck pain (7.9 of 10 vs 6.6 on a Numeric Rating Scale [NRS], p = 0.015), lower mean EQ-5D scores (68.9 vs 74.7, p < 0.001), but similar Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores (57.5 vs 49.9, p = 0.063) and myelopathy scores (13.4 vs 13.9, p = 0.546). Surgeries performed in either group were similar in terms of number of levels fused, osteotomies performed, and correction achieved (baseline to 3-month measurements) (p < 0.05). At 3 months, EQ-5D scores remained lower in the D group (74.0 vs 78.2, p = 0.044), and NDI scores were similar (48.5 vs 39.0, p = 0.053). However, neck pain improved in the D group (NRS score of 5.0 vs 4.3, p = 0.331), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores remained similar (14.2 vs 15.0, p = 0.211). At 6 months and 1 year, all HRQOL scores were similar between the 2 cohorts. One-year measurements were as follows: NDI 39.7 vs 40.7 (p = 0.878), NRS neck pain score of 4.1 vs 5.0 (p = 0.326), EQ-5D score of 77.1 vs 78.2 (p = 0.646), and mJOA score of 14.0 vs 14.2 (p = 0.835). Anxiety/depression levels reported on the EQ-5D scale were significantly higher in the depressed cohort at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (all p < 0.05), but were similar between groups at 1 year postoperatively (1.72 vs 1.53, p = 0.416). CONCLUSIONS Clinical depression was observed in many of the study patients with CD. After matching for baseline deformity, depression symptomology resulted in worse baseline EQ-5D and pain scores. Despite these baseline differences, both cohorts achieved similar results in all HRQOL assessments 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, demonstrating no clinical impact of depression on recovery up until 1 year after CD surgery. Thus, a history of depression does not appear to have an impact on recovery from CD surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients.
    (Neurosurgical focus, 2018-11) Scheer, Justin K; Oh, Taemin; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Daniels, Alan H; Sciubba, Daniel M; Hamilton, D Kojo; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Passias, Peter G; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Bess, Shay; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schwab, Frank; Klineberg, Eric O; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group
    OBJECTIVEPseudarthrosis can occur following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and can lead to instrumentation failure, recurrent pain, and ultimately revision surgery. In addition, it is one of the most expensive complications of ASD surgery. Risk factors contributing to pseudarthrosis in ASD have been described; however, a preoperative model predicting the development of pseudarthrosis does not exist. The goal of this study was to create a preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis based on demographic, radiographic, and surgical factors.METHODSA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, multicenter ASD database was conducted. Study inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with spinal deformity and surgery for the ASD. From among 82 variables assessed, 21 were used for model building after applying collinearity testing, redundancy, and univariable predictor importance ≥ 0.90. Variables included demographic data along with comorbidities, modifiable surgical variables, baseline coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters, and baseline scores for health-related quality of life measures. Patients groups were determined according to their Lenke radiographic fusion type at the 2-year follow-up: bilateral or unilateral fusion (union) or pseudarthrosis (nonunion). A decision tree was constructed, and internal validation was accomplished via bootstrapped training and testing data sets. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the model.RESULTSA total of 336 patients were included in the study (nonunion: 105, union: 231). The model was 91.3% accurate with an AUC of 0.94. From 82 initial variables, the top 21 covered a wide range of areas including preoperative alignment, comorbidities, patient demographics, and surgical use of graft material.CONCLUSIONSA model for predicting the development of pseudarthrosis at the 2-year follow-up was successfully created. This model is the first of its kind for complex predictive analytics in the development of pseudarthrosis for patients with ASD undergoing surgical correction and can aid in clinical decision-making for potential preventative strategies.