Browsing by Author "Harper, Barrie"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Access to COVID-19 testing by individuals with housing insecurity during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a scoping review.(Frontiers in public health, 2023-01) Johannesson, Jon M; Glover, William A; Petti, Cathy A; Veldman, Timothy H; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Taylor, Donald H; Hendren, Stephanie; Neighbors, Coralei E; Tillekeratne, L Gayani; Kennedy, Scott W; Harper, Barrie; Kibbe, Warren A; Corbie, Giselle; Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael; Woods, Christopher W; Lee, Mark JIntroduction
The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on healthcare disparities and inequities faced by individuals within marginalized and structurally disadvantaged groups in the United States. These individuals bore the heaviest burden across this pandemic as they faced increased risk of infection and difficulty in accessing testing and medical care. Individuals experiencing housing insecurity are a particularly vulnerable population given the additional barriers they face. In this scoping review, we identify some of the barriers this high-risk group experienced during the early days of the pandemic and assess novel solutions to overcome these barriers.Methods
A scoping review was performed following PRISMA-Sc guidelines looking for studies focusing on COVID-19 testing among individuals experiencing housing insecurity. Barriers as well as solutions to barriers were identified as applicable and summarized using qualitative methods, highlighting particular ways that proved effective in facilitating access to testing access and delivery.Results
Ultimately, 42 studies were included in the scoping review, with 143 barriers grouped into four categories: lack of cultural understanding, systemic racism, and stigma; medical care cost, insurance, and logistics; immigration policies, language, and fear of deportation; and other. Out of these 42 studies, 30 of these studies also suggested solutions to address them.Conclusion
A paucity of studies have analyzed COVID-19 testing barriers among those experiencing housing insecurity, and this is even more pronounced in terms of solutions to address those barriers. Expanding resources and supporting investigators within this space is necessary to ensure equitable healthcare delivery.Item Open Access Exposure-safety relationship for acyclovir in the treatment of neonatal herpes simplex virus disease.(Early human development, 2022-07) Ericson, Jessica E; Benjamin, Daniel K; Boakye-Agyeman, Felix; Balevic, Stephen J; Cotten, C Michael; Adler-Shohet, Felice; Laughon, Matthew; Poindexter, Brenda; Harper, Barrie; Payne, Elizabeth H; Kaneshige, Kim; Smith, P Brian; Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act - Pediatric Trials NetworkBackground
Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease has been treated with high-dose (20 mg/kg/dose) acyclovir since 1991.Aims
Determine the safety of acyclovir in infants with neonatal HSV treated with high-dose acyclovir; examine the association between acyclovir dose and exposure with adverse events (AEs).Study design
We obtained demographic information and acyclovir dosing via medical records. Acyclovir exposure was calculated using an established pharmacokinetic model.Subjects
Infants <120 days of age with neonatal HSV discharged from four academic children's hospitals.Outcome measures
We identified clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs).Results and conclusions
We identified 49 infants with neonatal HSV treated with acyclovir; 42 infants had complete 21-day dosing information. Median mean daily dose was 59 mg/kg/day. Clinical AEs were common among all gestational and postnatal age groups. Rash was the most common clinical AE (37 %). Mild laboratory AEs occurred in 2-37 % of infants. The median maximum doses (mg/kg/day) were higher among infants with hypokalemia, elevated blood urea nitrogen, and thrombocytosis. For all other laboratory AEs, the median maximum doses for infants without events were higher or equal to the median maximum dose of infants with the AE. The odds of experiencing any clinical or laboratory AE did not differ by predicted acyclovir exposure for either area under the curve (AUC) or maximum concentration (Cmax) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.00 [0.98, 1.03] and OR = 1.01 [0.93, 1.12], respectively). Although AEs were common with high-dose acyclovir exposure, severe AEs were rare. Acyclovir exposure was not associated with AEs.Item Open Access RADx-UP Testing Core: Access to COVID-19 Diagnostics in Community-Engaged Research with Underserved Populations.(Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023-08) Narayanasamy, Shanti; Veldman, Timothy H; Lee, Mark J; Glover, William A; Tillekeratne, L Gayani; Neighbors, Coralei E; Harper, Barrie; Raghavan, Vidya; Kennedy, Scott W; Carper, Miranda; Denny, Thomas; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Reller, Megan E; Kibbe, Warren A; Corbie, Giselle; Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael; Woods, Christopher W; Petti, Cathy AResearch on the COVID-19 pandemic revealed a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 infection and death among underserved populations and exposed low rates of SARS-CoV-2 testing in these communities. A landmark National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding initiative, the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) program, was developed to address the research gap in understanding the adoption of COVID-19 testing in underserved populations. This program is the single largest investment in health disparities and community-engaged research in the history of the NIH. The RADx-UP Testing Core (TC) provides community-based investigators with essential scientific expertise and guidance on COVID-19 diagnostics. This commentary describes the first 2 years of the TC's experience, highlighting the challenges faced and insights gained to safely and effectively deploy large-scale diagnostics for community-initiated research in underserved populations during a pandemic. The success of RADx-UP shows that community-based research to increase access and uptake of testing among underserved populations can be accomplished during a pandemic with tools, resources, and multidisciplinary expertise provided by a centralized testing-specific coordinating center. We developed adaptive tools to support individual testing strategies and frameworks for these diverse studies and ensured continuous monitoring of testing strategies and use of study data. In a rapidly evolving setting of tremendous uncertainty, the TC provided essential and real-time technical expertise to support safe, effective, and adaptive testing. The lessons learned go beyond this pandemic and can serve as a framework for rapid deployment of testing in response to future crises, especially when populations are affected inequitably.