Browsing by Author "Harrington, Robert A"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Acquisition, Analysis, and Sharing of Data in 2015 and Beyond: A Survey of the Landscape: A Conference Report From the American Heart Association Data Summit 2015.
    (J Am Heart Assoc, 2015-11-05) Antman, Elliott M; Benjamin, Emelia J; Harrington, Robert A; Houser, Steven R; Peterson, Eric D; Bauman, Mary Ann; Brown, Nancy; Bufalino, Vincent; Califf, Robert M; Creager, Mark A; Daugherty, Alan; Demets, David L; Dennis, Bernard P; Ebadollahi, Shahram; Jessup, Mariell; Lauer, Michael S; Lo, Bernard; MacRae, Calum A; McConnell, Michael V; McCray, Alexa T; Mello, Michelle M; Mueller, Eric; Newburger, Jane W; Okun, Sally; Packer, Milton; Philippakis, Anthony; Ping, Peipei; Prasoon, Prad; Roger, Véronique L; Singer, Steve; Temple, Robert; Turner, Melanie B; Vigilante, Kevin; Warner, John; Wayte, Patrick; American Heart Association Data Sharing Summit Attendees
    BACKGROUND: A 1.5-day interactive forum was convened to discuss critical issues in the acquisition, analysis, and sharing of data in the field of cardiovascular and stroke science. The discussion will serve as the foundation for the American Heart Association's (AHA's) near-term and future strategies in the Big Data area. The concepts evolving from this forum may also inform other fields of medicine and science. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 47 participants representing stakeholders from 7 domains (patients, basic scientists, clinical investigators, population researchers, clinicians and healthcare system administrators, industry, and regulatory authorities) participated in the conference. Presentation topics included updates on data as viewed from conventional medical and nonmedical sources, building and using Big Data repositories, articulation of the goals of data sharing, and principles of responsible data sharing. Facilitated breakout sessions were conducted to examine what each of the 7 stakeholder domains wants from Big Data under ideal circumstances and the possible roles that the AHA might play in meeting their needs. Important areas that are high priorities for further study regarding Big Data include a description of the methodology of how to acquire and analyze findings, validation of the veracity of discoveries from such research, and integration into investigative and clinical care aspects of future cardiovascular and stroke medicine. Potential roles that the AHA might consider include facilitating a standards discussion (eg, tools, methodology, and appropriate data use), providing education (eg, healthcare providers, patients, investigators), and helping build an interoperable digital ecosystem in cardiovascular and stroke science. CONCLUSION: There was a consensus across stakeholder domains that Big Data holds great promise for revolutionizing the way cardiovascular and stroke research is conducted and clinical care is delivered; however, there is a clear need for the creation of a vision of how to use it to achieve the desired goals. Potential roles for the AHA center around facilitating a discussion of standards, providing education, and helping establish a cardiovascular digital ecosystem. This ecosystem should be interoperable and needs to interface with the rapidly growing digital object environment of the modern-day healthcare system.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Defining a Mobile Health Roadmap for Cardiovascular Health and Disease.
    (J Am Heart Assoc, 2016-07-12) Eapen, Zubin J; Turakhia, Mintu P; McConnell, Michael V; Graham, Garth; Dunn, Patrick; Tiner, Colby; Rich, Carlo; Harrington, Robert A; Peterson, Eric D; Wayte, Patrick
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Generating evidence for therapeutic effects: the need for well-conducted randomized trials.
    (The Journal of clinical investigation, 2020-12-03) Califf, Robert M; Curtis, Lesley H; Harrington, Robert A; Hernandez, Adrian F; Peterson, Eric D
    In this viewpoint, Robert Califf, former commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and colleagues reflect on how to approach questions about which patient treatments and strategies work, particularly in light of the tremendous pressure on the government and biomedical research enterprise to quickly develop safe, effective therapies during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
    (Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020-08) Fanaroff, Alexander C; Califf, Robert M; Harrington, Robert A; Granger, Christopher B; McMurray, John JV; Patel, Manesh R; Bhatt, Deepak L; Windecker, Stephan; Hernandez, Adrian F; Gibson, C Michael; Alexander, John H; Lopes, Renato D
    Concerns about the external validity of traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs), together with the widespread availability of real-world data and advanced data analytic tools, have led to claims that common sense and clinical observation, rather than RCTs, should be the preferred method to generate evidence to support clinical decision-making. However, over the past 4 decades, results from well-done RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation. Common sense and clinical observation fail for several reasons: incomplete understanding of pathophysiology, biases and unmeasured confounding in observational research, and failure to understand risks and benefits of treatments within complex systems. Concerns about traditional RCT models are legitimate, but randomization remains a critical tool to understand the causal relationship between treatments and outcomes. Instead, development and promulgation of tools to apply randomization to real-world data are needed to build the best evidence base in cardiovascular medicine.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Safety and Tolerability of CSL112, a Reconstituted, Infusible, Plasma-Derived Apolipoprotein A-I, After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The AEGIS-I Trial (ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I).
    (Circulation, 2016-12) Michael Gibson, C; Korjian, Serge; Tricoci, Pierluigi; Daaboul, Yazan; Yee, Megan; Jain, Purva; Alexander, John H; Steg, P Gabriel; Lincoff, A Michael; Kastelein, John JP; Mehran, Roxana; D'Andrea, Denise M; Deckelbaum, Lawrence I; Merkely, Bela; Zarebinski, Maciej; Ophuis, Ton Oude; Harrington, Robert A

    Background

    Human or recombinant apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) has been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity and to regress atherosclerotic disease in animal and clinical studies. CSL112 is an infusible, plasma-derived apoA-I that has been studied in normal subjects or those with stable coronary artery disease. This study aimed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CSL112 in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction.

    Methods

    The AEGIS-I trial (Apo-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial. Patients with myocardial infarction were stratified by renal function and randomized 1:1:1 to CSL112 (2 g apoA-I per dose) and high-dose CSL112 (6 g apoA-I per dose), or placebo for 4 consecutive weekly infusions. Coprimary safety end points were occurrence of either a hepatic safety event (an increase in alanine transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal or an increase in total bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal) or a renal safety event (an increase in serum creatinine >1.5 times the baseline value or a new requirement for renal replacement therapy).

    Results

    A total of 1258 patients were randomized, and 91.2% received all 4 infusions. The difference in incidence rates for an increase in alanine transaminase or total bilirubin between both CSL112 arms and placebo was within the protocol-defined noninferiority margin of 4%. Similarly, the difference in incidence rates for an increase in serum creatinine or a new requirement for renal replacement therapy was within the protocol-defined noninferiority margin of 5%. CSL112 was associated with increases in apoA-I and ex vivo cholesterol efflux similar to that achieved in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In regard to the secondary efficacy end point, the risk for the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events among the groups was similar.

    Conclusions

    Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, 4 weekly infusions of CSL112 are feasible, well tolerated, and not associated with any significant alterations in liver or kidney function or other safety concern. The ability of CSL112 to acutely enhance cholesterol efflux was confirmed. The potential benefit of CSL112 to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events needs to be assessed in an adequately powered phase 3 trial.

    Clinical trial registration

    URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02108262.