Browsing by Author "Lebovic, Jordan"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Efficacy of Varying Surgical Approaches on Achieving Optimal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
    (Spine, 2023-07) Passias, Peter G; Ahmad, Waleed; Williamson, Tyler K; Lebovic, Jordan; Kebaish, Khaled; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Line, Breton; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Diebo, Bassel G; Klineberg, Eric O; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Daniels, Alan H; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Burton, Douglas C; Hart, Robert A; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Gupta, Munish C; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    The Roussouly, SRS-Schwab, and GAP classifications define alignment by spinal shape and deformity severity. The efficacy of different surgical approaches and techniques to successfully achieve these goals is not well understood.

    Purpose

    Identify the impact of surgical approach and/or technique on meeting complex realignment goals in adult spinal deformity(ASD) corrective-surgery.

    Study design/setting

    Retrospective.

    Methods

    Included: ASD patients fused to pelvis with two-year(2Y) data. Patients were categorized by: 1)Roussouly: matching current and theoretical spinal shapes; 2)improving in SRS-Schwab modifiers(0, +, ++); 3)improving GAP Proportionality by 2Y. ANCOVA and multivariable logistic regression analyses controlling for age, levels fused, baseline deformity, and three-column osteotomy usage compared the effect of different surgical approaches, interbody and osteotomy use on meeting realignment goals.

    Results

    693 ASD patients were included. By surgical approach, 65.7% were posterior-only and 34.3% underwent anterior-posterior(AP) approach with 76% receiving an osteotomy(21.8% 3CO). By 2Y, 34% matched Roussouly, 58% improved in GAP, 45% in SRS-Schwab PT, 62% SVA, and 70% PI-LL. Combined approaches were most effective for improvement in PT(OR: 1.7,[1.1-2.5]) and GAP(OR: 2.2,[1.5-3.2]). Specifically, ALIFs below L3 demonstrated higher rates of improvement versus TLIFs in Roussouly(OR: 1.7, [1.1-2.5]) and GAP(OR: 1.9, [1.3-2.7]). Patients undergoing PSO at L3 or L4 were more likely to improve in PT(OR: 2.0,[1.0-5.2]) and PI-LL(OR: 3.8[1.4-9.8]). Clinically, patients undergoing combined approach demonstrated higher rates of meeting SCB in ODI by 2Y while minimizing rates of PJF, most often with an ALIF at L5-S1(ODI-SCB: OR: 1.4,[1.1-2.0];PJF: OR: 0.4,[0.2-0.8]).

    Conclusions

    Among patients undergoing ASD realignment, optimal lumbar shape and proportion can be achieved more often with a combined approach. While TLIFs incorporating a three-column osteotomy at L3 and L4 can restore lordosis and normalize pelvic compensation, ALIFs at L5-S1 were most likely to achieve complex realignment goals with an added clinical benefit and mitigation of junctional failure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.
    (Clinical spine surgery, 2023-10) Passias, Peter G; Pierce, Katherine E; Williamson, Tyler K; Lebovic, Jordan; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Gum, Jeffrey L; Eastlack, Robert; Kim, Han Jo; Klineberg, Eric O; Daniels, Alan H; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Mundis, Gregory M; Scheer, Justin K; Park, Paul; Chou, Dean; Line, Breton; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Smith, Justin S; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Study design/setting

    This was a retrospective cohort study.

    Background

    Little is known of the intersection between surgical invasiveness, cervical deformity (CD) severity, and frailty.

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of CD surgery by invasiveness, frailty status, and baseline magnitude of deformity.

    Methods

    This study included CD patients with 1-year follow-up. Patients stratified in high deformity if severe in the following criteria: T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, McGregor's slope, C2-C7, C2-T3, and C2 slope. Frailty scores categorized patients into not frail and frail. Patients are categorized by frailty and deformity (not frail/low deformity; not frail/high deformity; frail/low deformity; frail/high deformity). Logistic regression assessed increasing invasiveness and outcomes [distal junctional failure (DJF), reoperation]. Within frailty/deformity groups, decision tree analysis assessed thresholds for an invasiveness cutoff above which experiencing a reoperation, DJF or not achieving Good Clinical Outcome was more likely.

    Results

    A total of 115 patients were included. Frailty/deformity groups: 27% not frail/low deformity, 27% not frail/high deformity, 23.5% frail/low deformity, and 22.5% frail/high deformity. Logistic regression analysis found increasing invasiveness and occurrence of DJF [odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P=0.002], and invasiveness increased with deformity severity (P<0.05). Not frail/low deformity patients more often met Optimal Outcome with an invasiveness index <63 (OR: 27.2, 95% CI: 2.7-272.8, P=0.005). An invasiveness index <54 for the frail/low deformity group led to a higher likelihood of meeting the Optimal Outcome (OR: 9.6, 95% CI: 1.5-62.2, P=0.018). For the frail/high deformity group, patients with a score <63 had a higher likelihood of achieving Optimal Outcome (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8, P=0.033). There was no significant cutoff of invasiveness for the not frail/high deformity group.

    Conclusions

    Our study correlated increased invasiveness in CD surgery to the risk of DJF, reoperation, and poor clinical success. The thresholds derived for deformity severity and frailty may enable surgeons to individualize the invasiveness of their procedures during surgical planning to account for the heightened risk of adverse events and minimize unfavorable outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The Additional Economic Burden of Frailty in Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.
    (Spine, 2022-10) Passias, Peter G; Kummer, Nicholas A; Williamson, Tyler K; Ahmad, Waleed; Lebovic, Jordan; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Kim, Han Jo; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Diebo, Bassel G; Gupta, Munish C; Soroceanu, Alexandra; Scheer, Justin K; Hamilton, D Kojo; Klineberg, Eric O; Line, Breton; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory M; Mummaneni, Praveen; Chou, Dean; Park, Paul; Schwab, Frank J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; Smith, Justin S; International Spine Study Group

    Summary of background data

    The influence of frailty on economic burden following corrective surgery for the adult cervical deformity (CD) is understudied and may provide valuable insights for preoperative planning.

    Objective

    To assess the influence of baseline frailty status on the economic burden of CD surgery.

    Study design

    Retrospective cohort.

    Materials and methods

    CD patients with frailty scores and baseline and two-year Neck Disability Index data were included. Frailty score was categorized patients by modified CD frailty index into not frail (NF) and frail (F). Analysis of covariance was used to estimate marginal means adjusting for age, sex, surgical approach, and baseline sacral slope, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis. Costs were derived from PearlDiver registry data. Reimbursement consisted of a standardized estimate using regression analysis of Medicare payscales for services within a 30-day window including length of stay and death. This data is representative of the national average Medicare cost differentiated by complication/comorbidity outcome, surgical approach, and revision status. Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at two years was calculated for NF and F patients.

    Results

    There were 126 patients included. There were 68 NF patients and 58 classified as F. Frailty groups did not differ by overall complications, instance of distal junctional kyphosis, or reoperations (all P >0.05). These groups had similar rates of radiographic and clinical improvement by two years. NF and F had similar overall cost ($36,731.03 vs. $37,356.75, P =0.793), resulting in equivocal costs per QALYs for both patients at two years ($90,113.79 vs. $80,866.66, P =0.097).

    Conclusion

    F and NF patients experienced similar complication rates and upfront costs, with equivocal utility gained, leading to comparative cost-effectiveness with NF patients based on cost per QALYs at two years. Surgical correction for CD is an economical healthcare investment for F patients when accounting for anticipated utility gained and cost-effectiveness following the procedure.

    Level of evidence

    III.