Browsing by Author "Lee, Henry C"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Randomized controlled trial of the "WISER" intervention to reduce healthcare worker burnout.(Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021-08-09) Profit, Jochen; Adair, Kathryn C; Cui, Xin; Mitchell, Briana; Brandon, Debra; Tawfik, Daniel S; Rigdon, Joseph; Gould, Jeffrey B; Lee, Henry C; Timpson, Wendy L; McCaffrey, Martin J; Davis, Alexis S; Pammi, Mohan; Matthews, Melissa; Stark, Ann R; Papile, Lu-Ann; Thomas, Eric; Cotten, Michael; Khan, Amir; Sexton, J BryanObjective
Test web-based implementation for the science of enhancing resilience (WISER) intervention efficacy in reducing healthcare worker (HCW) burnout.Design
RCT using two cohorts of HCWs of four NICUs each, to improve HCW well-being (primary outcome: burnout). Cohort 1 received WISER while Cohort 2 acted as a waitlist control.Results
Cohorts were similar, mostly female (83%) and nurses (62%). In Cohorts 1 and 2 respectively, 182 and 299 initiated WISER, 100 and 176 completed 1-month follow-up, and 78 and 146 completed 6-month follow-up. Relative to control, WISER decreased burnout (-5.27 (95% CI: -10.44, -0.10), p = 0.046). Combined adjusted cohort results at 1-month showed that the percentage of HCWs reporting concerning outcomes was significantly decreased for burnout (-6.3% (95%CI: -11.6%, -1.0%); p = 0.008), and secondary outcomes depression (-5.2% (95%CI: -10.8, -0.4); p = 0.022) and work-life integration (-11.8% (95%CI: -17.9, -6.1); p < 0.001). Improvements endured at 6 months.Conclusion
WISER appears to durably improve HCW well-being.Clinical trials number
NCT02603133; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02603133.Item Open Access Safety climate, safety climate strength, and length of stay in the NICU.(BMC health services research, 2019-10-22) Tawfik, Daniel S; Thomas, Eric J; Vogus, Timothy J; Liu, Jessica B; Sharek, Paul J; Nisbet, Courtney C; Lee, Henry C; Sexton, J Bryan; Profit, JochenBackground
Safety climate is an important marker of patient safety attitudes within health care units, but the significance of intra-unit variation of safety climate perceptions (safety climate strength) is poorly understood. This study sought to examine the standard safety climate measure (percent positive response (PPR)) and safety climate strength in relation to length of stay (LOS) of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants within California neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Methods
Observational study of safety climate from 2073 health care providers in 44 NICUs. Consistent perceptions among a NICU's respondents, i.e., safety climate strength, was determined via intra-unit standard deviation of safety climate scores. The relation between safety climate PPR, safety climate strength, and LOS among VLBW (< 1500 g) infants was evaluated using log-linear regression. Secondary outcomes were infections, chronic lung disease, and mortality.Results
NICUs had safety climate PPRs of 66 ± 12%, intra-unit standard deviations 11 (strongest) to 23 (weakest), and median LOS 60 days. NICUs with stronger climates had LOS 4 days shorter than those with weaker climates. In interaction modeling, NICUs with weak climates and low PPR had the longest LOS, NICUs with strong climates and low PPR had the shortest LOS, and NICUs with high PPR (both strong and weak) had intermediate LOS. Stronger climates were associated with lower odds of infections, but not with other secondary outcomes.Conclusions
Safety climate strength is independently associated with LOS and moderates the association between PPR and LOS among VLBW infants. Strength and PPR together provided better prediction than PPR alone, capturing variance in outcomes missed by PPR. Evaluations of NICU safety climate consider both positivity (PPR) and consistency of responses (strength) across individuals.Item Open Access The Correlation Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Safety Culture and Quality of Care.(Journal of patient safety, 2020-12) Profit, Jochen; Sharek, Paul J; Cui, Xin; Nisbet, Courtney C; Thomas, Eric J; Tawfik, Daniel S; Lee, Henry C; Draper, David; Sexton, J BryanObjectives
Key validated clinical metrics are being used individually and in aggregate (Baby-MONITOR) to monitor the performance of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The degree to which perceptions of key components of safety culture, safety climate, and teamwork are related to aspects of NICU quality of care is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to test whether NICU performance on key clinical metrics correlates with caregiver perceptions of safety culture.Study design
Cross-sectional study of 6253 very low-birth-weight infants in 44 NICUs. We measured clinical quality via the Baby-MONITOR and its nine risk-adjusted and standardized subcomponents (antenatal corticosteroids, hypothermia, pneumothorax, healthcare-associated infection, chronic lung disease, retinopathy screen, discharge on any human milk, growth velocity, and mortality). A voluntary sample of 2073 of 3294 eligible professional caregivers provided ratings of safety and teamwork climate using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. We examined NICU-level variation across clinical and safety culture ratings and conducted correlation analysis of these dimensions.Results
We found significant variation in clinical and safety culture metrics across NICUs. Neonatal intensive care unit teamwork and safety climate ratings were correlated with absence of healthcare-associated infection (r = 0.39 [P = 0.01] and r = 0.29 [P = 0.05], respectively). None of the other clinical metrics, individual or composite, were significantly correlated with teamwork or safety climate.Conclusions
Neonatal intensive care unit teamwork and safety climate were correlated with healthcare-associated infections but not with other quality metrics. Linkages to clinical measures of quality require additional research.