Browsing by Author "Lewis, Jeffrey D"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Barriers and facilitators to implementation of epilepsy self-management programs: a systematic review using qualitative evidence synthesis methods.
    (Systematic reviews, 2020-04-25) Lewinski, Allison A; Shapiro, Abigail; Gierisch, Jennifer M; Goldstein, Karen M; Blalock, Dan V; Luedke, Matthew W; Gordon, Adelaide M; Bosworth, Hayden B; Drake, Connor; Lewis, Jeffrey D; Sinha, Saurabh R; Husain, Aatif M; Tran, Tung T; Van Noord, Megan G; Williams, John W

    Background

    Epilepsy affects nearly 50 million people worldwide. Self-management is critical for individuals with epilepsy in order to maintain optimal physical, cognitive, and emotional health. Implementing and adopting a self-management program requires considering many factors at the person, program, and systems levels. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies to identify facilitators and barriers that impact implementation and adoption of self-management programs for adults with epilepsy.

    Methods

    We used established systematic review methodologies for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. We included studies addressing facilitators (i.e., factors that aided) or barriers (i.e., factors that impeded) to implementation and adoption of self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy. We conducted a narrative thematic synthesis to identify facilitators and barriers.

    Results

    The literature search identified 2700 citations; 13 studies met eligibility criteria. Our synthesis identified five themes that categorize facilitators and barriers to successful implementation epilepsy self-management: (1) relevance, intervention content that facilitates acquisition of self-management skills; (2) personalization, intervention components that account for the individual's social, physical, and environmental characteristics; (3) intervention components, components and dosing of the intervention; (4) technology considerations, considerations that account for individual's use, familiarity with, and ownership of technology; and (5) clinician interventionist, role and preparation of the individual who leads intervention. We identified facilitators in 11 of the 13 studies and barriers in 11 of the 13 studies and classified these by social-ecological level (i.e., patient/caregiver, program, site/system).

    Conclusion

    Identification of facilitators and barriers at multiple levels provides insight into disease-specific factors that influence implementation and adoption of self-management programs for individuals with epilepsy. Our findings indicate that involving individuals with epilepsy and their caregivers in intervention development, and then tailoring intervention content during the intervention, can help ensure the content is relevant to intervention participants. Our findings also indicate the role of the clinician (i.e., the individual who provides self-management education) is important to intervention implementation, and key issues with clinicians were identified as barriers and opportunities for improvement. Overall, our findings have practical value for those seeking to implement and adopt self-management interventions for epilepsy and other chronic illnesses.

    Systematic review registration

    PROSPERO registration number is CRD42018098604.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Self-management of Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.
    (Annals of internal medicine, 2019-07) Luedke, Matthew W; Blalock, Dan V; Goldstein, Karen M; Kosinski, Andrzej S; Sinha, Saurabh R; Drake, Connor; Lewis, Jeffrey D; Husain, Aatif M; Lewinski, Allison A; Shapiro, Abigail; Gierisch, Jennifer M; Tran, Tung T; Gordon, Adelaide M; Van Noord, Megan G; Bosworth, Hayden B; Williams, John W
    Background:Although self-management is recommended for persons with epilepsy, its optimal strategies and effects are uncertain. Purpose:To evaluate the components and efficacy of self-management interventions in the treatment of epilepsy in community-dwelling persons. Data Sources:English-language searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and CINAHL in April 2018; the MEDLINE search was updated in March 2019. Study Selection:Randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies of self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy. Data Extraction:An investigator assessed study characteristics; intervention details, including 6 components of self-management; and outcomes, which were verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed independently by 2 investigators. Data Synthesis:13 randomized and 2 nonrandomized studies (2514 patients) evaluated self-management interventions. Interventions were delivered primarily in group settings, used a median of 4 components, and followed 2 general strategies: 1 based on education and the other on psychosocial therapy. Education-based approaches improved self-management behaviors (standardized mean difference, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.04]), and psychosocial therapy-based approaches improved quality of life (mean difference, 6.64 [CI, 2.51 to 10.77]). Overall, self-management interventions did not reduce seizure rates, but 1 educational intervention decreased a composite of seizures, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Limitation:High ROB in most studies, incomplete intervention descriptions, and studies limited to English-language publications. Conclusion:There is limited evidence that self-management strategies modestly improve some patient outcomes that are important to persons with epilepsy. Overall, self-management research in epilepsy is limited by the range of interventions tested, the small number of studies using self-monitoring technology, and uncertainty about components and strategies associated with benefit. Primary Funding Source:U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42018098604).