Browsing by Author "Lewis, Stephen"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 18 of 18
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A bony Chance fracture through L1 following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.
    (Spine deformity, 2021-05) Rocos, Brett; Kato, So; Lebel, David; Lewis, Stephen

    Study design

    Case report.

    Introduction

    Instrumented posterior fusion using pedicle screws has been the mainstay of the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis since it was popularised by Roy-Camille in the 1970s. The aim of this case report is to describe the occurrence and salvage of an L1 chance fracture occurring through the lower instrumented vertebra following pedicle screw placement for posterior spinal instrumented fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

    Case report

    A 15-year-old female patient underwent T2-L1 posterior instrumented fusion for a Lenke 1b deformity. The selection of fusion levels was made based upon standing and bending radiographs which showed a non-structural lumbar curve. Early recovery was uneventful. At 6 months post-operatively, the patient reported new deformity and pain. A chance fracture at L1 was diagnosed and subsequent extension of instrumentation to L3 was carried out. Final post-operative recovery was uneventful and the patient returned to an active lifestyle.

    Conclusion

    Several factors can contribute to the occurrence of a fracture through an instrumented pedicle. This case shows that there must be due consideration of the small pedicle at L1 when it is chosen as the LIV.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Activity and sports resumption after long segment fusions to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity: survey results of AO Spine members.
    (Spine deformity, 2023-07) Theologis, Alekos A; Cummins, Daniel D; Kato, So; Lewis, Stephen; Shaffrey, Christopher; Lenke, Lawrence; Berven, Sigurd H; AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity

    Purpose

    To assess recommendations for when adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients may return to athletic activities after surgery.

    Methods

    A web-based survey was administered to members of AO Spine. The survey consisted of surgeon demographic information and questions asking when a patient undergoing a long thoracolumbar fusion (> 5 levels) with pelvic fixation for ASD would be allowed to resume unrestricted range of motion (ROM), non-contact sports, and contact sports postoperatively. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine predictors for time to resume each activity.

    Results

    One hundred twenty four members' responses were included for analysis. The majority of respondents would allow unrestricted ROM within 3 months postop (< 3 months: 81% vs > 3 months: 19%]. For when to return to non-contact sports, the most common responses were "2-3 months" (26.6%), "3-4 months" (26.6%), and "6-12 months" (18.5%). For when to return to contact sports, the majority advised > 4 months postop [> 4 months: "4-6 months" (19.2%), "6-12 months" (28.0%), " > 12 months" (28.8%) versus < 4 months: "1-2 months" (4.0%), "2-3 months" (1.6%), "3-4 months" (8.8%)]. 8.8% responded they would "never" allow resumption of contact sports.

    Conclusion

    There was significant variation between surgeons' recommendations for resumption of unrestricted range of motion and sports following long fusion with pelvic fixation for ASD. An evidence-based approach to activity recommendations will require information on outcomes and complications.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Correlate Weakly With Radiographic Parameters: A Multicenter, Prospective NIH Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis Study of 286 Patients.
    (Spine, 2016-11) Chapman, Todd M; Baldus, Christine R; Lurie, Jon D; Glassman, Steven D; Schwab, Frank J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Lafage, Virginie; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Kim, Han J; Smith, Justin S; Crawford, Charles H; Lenke, Lawrence G; Buchowski, Jacob M; Edwards, Charles; Koski, Tyler; Parent, Stefan; Lewis, Stephen; Kang, Daniel G; McClendon, Jamal; Metz, Lionel; Zebala, Lukas P; Kelly, Michael P; Spratt, Kevin F; Bridwell, Keith H

    Study design

    Prospective, cross-sectional study.

    Objective

    The aim of the study was to determine which radiographic parameters drive patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in primary presentation adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS).

    Summary of background data

    Previous literature suggests correlations between PROs and sagittal plane deformity (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch, pelvic tilt [PT]). Prior work included revision and primary adult spinal deformity patients. The present study addresses only primary presentation ASLS.

    Methods

    Prospective baseline data were analyzed on 286 patients enrolled in an NIH RO1 clinical trial by nine centers from 2010 to 2014.

    Inclusion criteria

    40 to 80 years old, lumbar Cobb (LC) 30° or higher and Scoliosis Research Society-23 score 4.0 or less in Pain, Function or Self-Image domains, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 20 or higher. Patients were primary presentation (no prior spinal deformity surgery) and had complete baseline data: standing coronal/sagittal 36" radiographs and PROs (ODI, Scoliosis Research Society-23, Short Form-12). Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relations between radiographic parameters and PROs for the study population and a subset of patients with ODI 40 or higher. Analysis of variance was used to identify differences in PROs for radiographic modifier groups.

    Results

    Mean age was 60.3 years. Mean spinopelvic parameters were: LL = -39.2°; SVA = 3.1 cm; sacral slope = 32.5°; PT = 23.9°; PI-LL mismatch = 16.8°. Only weak correlations (0.2-0.4) were identified between population sacral slope, SVA and SVA modifiers, and SRS function. SVA and SVA modifiers were weakly associated with ODI. Although there were more correlations in subset analysis of high-symptom patients, all were weak. Analysis of variance identified significant differences in ODI reported by SVA modifier groups.

    Conclusion

    In primary presentation patients with ASLS and a subset of "high-symptom" patients (ODI ≥ 40), only weak associations between baseline PROs and radiographic parameters were identified. For this patient population, these results suggest regional radiographic parameters (LC, LL, PT, PI-LL mismatch) are not drivers of PROs and cannot be used to extrapolate effect on patient-perceived pathology.

    Level of evidence

    2.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Calibration of a comprehensive predictive model for the development of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity patients with consideration of contemporary goals and techniques.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-06) Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Hamilton, D Kojo; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory; Nunley, Pierce D; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence; Hostin, Richard; Gupta, Munish C; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Kim, Han Jo; Lafage, Virginie; Passias, Peter G

    Objective

    The objective of this study was to calibrate an updated predictive model incorporating novel clinical, radiographic, and prophylactic measures to assess the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF).

    Methods

    Operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and baseline and 2-year postoperative data were included. PJK was defined as ≥ 10° in sagittal Cobb angle between the inferior uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) endplate and superior endplate of the UIV + 2 vertebrae. PJF was radiographically defined as a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle ≥ 15° with the presence of structural failure and/or mechanical instability, or PJK with reoperation. Backstep conditional binary supervised learning models assessed baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical information to predict the occurrence of PJK and PJF. Internal cross validation of the model was performed via a 70%/30% cohort split. Conditional inference tree analysis determined thresholds at an alpha level of 0.05.

    Results

    Seven hundred seventy-nine patients with ASD (mean 59.87 ± 14.24 years, 78% female, mean BMI 27.78 ± 6.02 kg/m2, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.74 ± 1.71) were included. PJK developed in 50.2% of patients, and 10.5% developed PJF by their last recorded visit. The six most significant demographic, radiographic, surgical, and postoperative predictors of PJK/PJF were baseline age ≥ 74 years, baseline sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) T1 pelvic angle modifier > 1, baseline SAAS pelvic tilt modifier > 0, levels fused > 10, nonuse of prophylaxis measures, and 6-week SAAS pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis modifier > 1 (all p < 0.015). Overall, the model was deemed significant (p < 0.001), and internally validated receiver operating characteristic analysis returned an area under the curve of 0.923, indicating robust model fit.

    Conclusions

    PJK and PJF remain critical concerns in ASD surgery, and efforts to reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF have resulted in the development of novel prophylactic techniques and enhanced clinical and radiographic selection criteria. This study demonstrates a validated model incorporating such techniques that may allow for the prediction of clinically significant PJK and PJF, and thus assist in optimizing patient selection, enhancing intraoperative decision making, and reducing postoperative complications in ASD surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Canadian Spine Society: 23rd Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, March 1 - Saturday, March 4, Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Québec, Que., Canada.
    (Can J Surg, 2023) Birk, Manjot; Sidhu, Kara; Filezio, Marina Rosa; Singh, Vishwajeet; Ferri-de-Barros, Fabio; Chan, Vivien; Shumilak, Geoffrey; Nataraj, Andrew; Langston, Holly; Yee, Nicholas J; Iorio, Carlo; Shkumat, Nicholas; Rocos, Brett; Ertl-Wagner, Birgit; Lebel, David; Camp, Mark W; Dimentberg, Evan; Saran, Neil; Laflamme, Melissa; Ouellet, Jean A; Wenghofer, Jessica; Livock, Holly; Beaton, Luke; Tice, Andrew; Smit, Kevin; Graham, Ryan; Duarte, Matias Pereira; Roy-Beaudry, Marjolaine; Turgeon, Isabelle; Joncas, Julie; Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc; Labelle, Hubert; Barchi, Soraya; Parent, Stefan; Gholamian, Tara; Livock, Holly; Tice, Andrew; Smit, Kevin; Yoon, Samuel; Zulfiqar, Amna; Rocos, Brett; Murphy, Anne; Bath, Natasha; Moll, Stanley; Sorbara, Julia; Lebel, David; Camp, Mark W; Nallet, Jérémie Arthur; Rocos, Brett; Lebel, David Eduard; Zeller, Reinhard; Dermott, Jennifer A; Kim, Dorothy J; Anthony, Alison; Zeller, Reinhard; Lebel, David E; Wang, Zhi; Shen, Jesse; Kamel, Youssef; Liu, Jia; Shedid, Daniel; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Boubez, Ghassan; Rizkallah, Maroun; Rizkallah, Maroun; Shen, Jesse; Boubez, Ghassan; Kamel, Youssef; Liu, Jia; Shedid, Daniel; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Lavoie, Frederic; Yug, Sung-Joo; Wang, Zhi; Alavi, Fatemeh; Nielsen, Christopher; Rampersaud, Raja; Lewis, Stephen; Cheung, Angela M; Cadieux, Chloe; Fernandes, Renan; Brzozowski, Pawel; Zdero, Radovan; Bailey, Chris; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Cherry, Ahmed; Manoharan, Ragavan; Xu, Mark; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Iorio, Carlo; Raj, Aditya; Nielsen, Christopher; Rampersaud, Raja; Lewis, Stephen; Beange, Kristen; Graham, Ryan; Livock, Holly; Smit, Kevin; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Raj, Aditya; Xu, Mark; Iorio, Carlo; Nielsen, Christopher J; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Lewis, Stephen J; Nasrabadi, Ali Asghar Mohammadi; Moammer, Gemah; Phee, John Mc; Walker, Taryn; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris S; Herrington, Brandon J; Fernandes, Renan R; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Siddiqi, Fawaz; Bailey, Christopher S; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan R; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris S; Yang, Michael MH; Riva-Cambrin, Jay; Cunningham, Jonathan; Casha, Steven; Cadieux, Chloe N; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan; Glennie, Andrew; Fisher, Charles; Rampersaud, Raja; Xu, Mark; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditya; Srikandarajah, Nish; Iorio, Carlo; Nielsen, Christopher; Lewis, Stephen; Rampersaud, Raja; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditya; McIntosh, Greg; Manoharan, Ragavan; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Nielsen, Christopher; Xu, Mark; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Iorio, Carlo; Perruccio, Anthony; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Raja; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Richardson, Eden; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Attabib, Najmedden; Small, Chris; Kolyvas, George; LeRoux, Andre; Outcomes, Canadian Spine; Investigators, Research Network; Hebert, Jeff; Baisamy, Victor; Rizkallah, Maroun; Shen, Jesse; Cresson, Thierry; Vazquez, Carlos; Wang, Zhi; Boubez, Ghassan; Lung, Tiffany; Canizares, Mayilee; Perruccio, Anthony; Rampersaud, Raja; Crawford, Eric J; Ravinsky, Robert A; Perruccio, Anthony V; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Coyte, Peter C; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Bartolozzi, Arthur R; Barzilai, Ori; Chou, Dean; Laufer, Ilya; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Sahgal, Arjun; Rhines, Laurence D; Scuibba, Daniel M; Lazary, Aron; Weber, Michael H; Schuster, James M; Boriani, Stefano; Bettegowda, Chetan; Arnold, Paul M; Clarke, Michelle J; Fehlings, Michael G; Reynolds, Jeremy J; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Fisher, Charles G; Dea, Nicolas; Versteeg, Anne L; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Laufer, Ilya; Teixeira, William; Barzilai, Ori; Gasbarrini, Alessandro; Fehlings, Michael G; Chou, Dean; Johnson, Michael G; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Dea, Nicolas; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Goldschlager, Tony; Shin, John H; O'Toole, John E; Sciubba, Daniel M; Bettegowda, Chetan; Clarke, Michelle J; Weber, Michael H; Mesfin, Addisu; Kawahara, Norio; Goodwin, Rory; Disch, Alexander; Lazary, Aron; Boriani, Stefano; Sahgal, Arjun; Rhines, Laurence; Fisher, Charles G; Versteeg, Anne L; Gal, Roxanne; Reich, Leilani; Tsang, Angela; Aludino, Allan; Sahgal, Arjun; Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan; Fisher, Charles G; Verkooijen, Lenny; Rizkallah, Maroun; Wang, Zhi; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Shedid, Daniel; Shen, Jesse; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Belguendouz, Céline; AlKafi, Rayan; Boubez, Ghassan; MacLean, Mark A; Georgiopoulos, Miltiadis; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Germscheid, Niccole; Goodwin, C Rory; Weber, Michael; International, Ao Spine; Rizkallah, Maroun; Boubez, Ghassan; Zhang, Hao; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Brindamour, Pamela; Boule, Danielle; Shen, Jesse; Shedid, Daniel; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Wang, Zhi; Correale, Marcia Rebecca; Soever, Leslie Jayne; Rampersaud, Raja; Malic, Claudia Cristina; Dubreuil, Melanie; Duke, Kate; Kingwell, Stephen P; Lin, Zihan; MacLean, Mark A; Julien, Lisa C; Patriquin, Glenn; LeBlanc, Jason; Green, Ryan; Alant, Jacob; Barry, Sean; Glennie, R Andrew; Oxney, William; Christie, Sean D; Sarraj, Mohamed; Alqahtani, Abdullah; Thornley, Patrick; Koziarz, Frank; Bailey, Christopher S; Freire-Archer, Millaray; Bhanot, Kunal; Kachur, Edward; Bhandari, Mohit; Oitment, Colby; Malhotra, Armaan K; Balas, Michael; Jaja, Blessing NR; Harrington, Erin M; Hofereiter, Johann; Jaffe, Rachael H; He, Yingshi; Byrne, James P; Wilson, Jefferson R; Witiw, Christopher D; Brittain, Kennedy CM; Christie, Sean; Pillai, Saranyan; Dvorak, Marcel F; Evaniew, Nathan; Chen, Melody; Waheed, Zeina; Rotem-Kohavi, Naama; Fallah, Nader; Noonan, Vanessa K; Fisher, Charles G; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Dea, Nicolas; Ailon, Tamir; Street, John; Kwon, Brian K; Sandarage, Ryan V; Galuta, Ahmad; Ghinda, Diana; Kwan, Jason CS; TsaI, Eve C; Hachem, Laureen D; Hong, James; Velumian, Alexander; Mothe, Andrea J; Tator, Charles H; Fehlings, Michael G; Shakil, Husain; Jaja, Blessing NR; Zhang, Peng; Jaffe, Rachael; Malhotra, Armaan K; Wilson, Jefferson R; Witiw, Christopher D; Rotem-Kohavi, Naama; Dvorak, Marcel F; Dea, Nicolas; Evaniew, Nathan; Chen, Melody; Waheed, Zeina; Xu, Jijie; Fallah, Nader; Noonan, Vanessa; Kwon, Brian; Dandurand, Charlotte; Muijs, Sander; Dvorak, Marcel; Schnake, Klaus; Cumhur; Ouml Ner; Greene, Ryan; Furlong, Bradley; Smith-Forrester, Jenna; Swab, Michelle; Christie, Sean D; Hall, Amanda; Leck, Erika; Marshall, Emily; Christie, Sean; Dvorak, Marcel F; Cumhur, F; Ouml Ner; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Benneker, Lorin M; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; El-Sharkawi, Mohammad; Popescu, Eugen Cezar; Tee, Jin Wee; Paquet, Jerome; France, John C; Allen, Richard; Lavelle, William F; Hirschfeld, Miguel; Pneumaticos, Spyros; Dandurand, Charlotte; Cumhur; Ouml Ner; Muijs, Sander; Schnake, Klaus; Dvorak, Marcel; Fernandes, Renan Rodrigues; Thornley, Patrick; Urquhart, Jennifer; Kelly, Sean; Alenezi, Nasser; Alahmari, Abdulmajeed; Siddiqi, Fawaz; Singh, Supriya; Rasoulinejad, Parham; Bailey, Christopher; Evaniew, Nathan; Burger, Lukas D; Dea, Nicolas; Cadotte, David W; McIntosh, Greg; Jacobs, Bradley; St-Laurent-Lebeux, Loïc; Bourassa-Moreau, Étienne; Sarraj, Mohamed; Majeed, Meerab; Guha, Daipayan; Pahuta, Markian; Laflamme, Mathieu; McIntosh, Greg; Dea, Nicolas; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Silva, Yan Gabriel Morais David; Goulet, Julien; McIntosh, Greg; Bedard, Sonia; Pimenta, Newton; Blanchard, Jocelyn; Couture, Jerome; LaRue, Bernard; Investigators, Csorn; Adams, Tyler; Cunningham, Erin; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Vandewint, Amanda; Manson, Niel; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Hebert, Jeffery; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Hillier, Troy; Bailey, Chris S; Fisher, Charles; Rampersaud, Raja; Koto, Prosper; Glennie, R Andrew; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Lewkonia, Peter; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Ben-Israel, David; Crawford, Eric J; Fisher, Charles; Dea, Nicolas; Spackman, Eldon; Rampersaud, Raja; Thomas, Kenneth C; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Nielsen, Christopher; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Raj, Aditiya; Xu, Mark; Iorio, Carlo; Bailey, Chris; Dea, Nicolas; Fisher, Charles; Hall, Hamilton; Manson, Neil; Thomas, Kenneth; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Urquhart, Jennifer; Fernandes, Renan R; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Bailey, Chris; Yang, Michael MH; Far, Rena; Sajobi, Tolulope; Riva-Cambrin, Jay; Casha, Steven; Bond, Michael; Street, John; Fisher, Charles; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Sutherland, Jason M; Silva, Yan; Pimenta, Newton Godoy; LaRue, Bernard; Bedard, Sonia; Oviedo, Sonia Cheng; Goulet, Julien; Couture, Jerome; Blanchard, Jocelyn; McDonald, James; Al-Jahdali, Fares; Urquhart, Jennifer; Alahmari, Abdulmajeed; Rampersaud, Raja; Fisher, Charles; Bailey, Chris; Glennie, Andrew; Evaniew, Nathan; Coyle, Matthew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Bailey, Christopher S; Jacobs, W Bradley; Cadotte, David W; Thomas, Kenneth C; Attabib, Najmedden; Paquet, Jérôme; Nataraj, Andrew; Christie, Sean D; Weber, Michael H; Phan, Philippe; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Fisher, Charles G; Hall, Hamilton; McIntosh, Greg; Dea, Nicolas; Malhotra, Armaan K; Davis, Aileen M; He, Yingshi; Harrington, Erin M; Jaja, Blessing NR; Zhu, Mary P; Shakil, Husain; Dea, Nicolas; Jacobs, W Bradley; Cadotte, David W; Paquet, Jérôme; Weber, Michael H; Phan, Philippe; Christie, Sean D; Nataraj, Andrew; Bailey, Christopher S; Johnson, Michael G; Fisher, Charles G; Manson, Neil; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Thomas, Kenneth C; Hall, Hamilton; Fehlings, Michael G; Ahn, Henry; Ginsberg, Howard J; Witiw, Christopher D; Wilson, Jefferson R; Althagafi, Alwalaa; McIntosh, Greg; Charest-Morin, Raphaële; Rizzuto, Michael A; Ailon, Tamir; Dea, Nicolas; Evaniew, Nathan; Jacobs, Bradley W; Paquet, Jerome; Rampersaud, Raja; Hall, Hamilton; Bailey, Christopher S; Weber, Michael; Johnson, Michael G; Nataraj, Andrew; Attabib, Najmedden; Cadotte, David W; Manson, Neil; Stratton, Alexandra; Christie, Sean D; Thomas, Kenneth C; Wilson, Jefferson R; Fisher, Charles G; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Bak, Alex B; Alvi, Mohammed A; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Salo, Paul; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Dandurand, Charlotte; Laghaei, Pedram Farimani; Ailon, Tamir; Charest-Morin, Raphaele; Dea, Nicolas; Dvorak, Marcel; Fisher, Charles; Kwon, Brian K; Paquette, Scott; Street, John; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Bouchard, Jacques; Salo, Paul; Jacobs, Brad; Varshney, Vishal P; Sahjpaul, Ramesh; Paquette, Scott; Osborn, Jill; Bak, Alex B; Moghaddamjou, Ali; Fehlings, Michael G; Leck, Erika; Marshall, Emily; Christie, Sean; Elkaim, Lior M; Lasry, Oliver J; Raj, Aditya; Murray, Jean-Christophe; Cherry, Ahmed; McIntosh, Greg; Nielsen, Christopher; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Manoharan, Ragavan; Iorio, Carlo; Xu, Mark; Perruccio, Anthony; Canizares, Mayilee; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Stratton, Alexandra; Tierney, Sarah; Wai, Eugene K; Phan, Philippe; Kingwell, Stephen; Magnan, Marie-Claude; Soroceanu, Alex; Nicholls, Fred; Thomas, Ken; Evaniew, Nathan; Salo, Paul; Bouchard, Jacques; Jacobs, Brad; Spanninga, Barend; Hoelen, Thomáy-Claire A; Johnson, Scott; Arts, Jacobus JC; Bailey, Chris S; Urquhart, Jennifer C; Glennie, R Andrew; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Fisher, Charles G; Levett, Jordan J; Elkaim, Lior M; Alotaibi, Naif M; Weber, Michael H; Dea, Nicolas; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M; Cherry, Ahmed; Yee, Albert; Jaber, Nadia; Fehlings, Michael; Cunningham, Erin; Adams, Tyler; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Vandewint, Amanda; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Hebert, Jeffery; Werier, Joel; Smit, Kevin; Villeneuve, James; Sachs, Adam; Abdelbary, Hesham; Al-Mosuli, Yusra Kassim; Rakhra, Kawan; Phan, Philippe; Nagata, Kosei; Gum, Jeffrey L; Brown, Morgan E; Daniels, Christy L; Carreon, Leah Y; Bonello, John-Peter; Koucheki, Robert; Abbas, Aazad; Lex, Johnathan; Nucci, Nicholas; Whyne, Cari; Larouche, Jeremie; Ahn, Henry; Finkelstein, Joel; Lewis, Stephen; Toor, Jay; Lee, Nathan J; Orosz, Lindsay D; Gum, Jeffrey L; Poulter, Gregory T; Jazini, Ehsan; Haines, Colin M; Good, Christopher R; Lehman, Ronald A; Crawford, Eric J; Ravinsky, Robert A; Perruccio, Anthony V; Coyte, Peter C; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Freire-Archer, Millaray; Sarraj, Mohamed; AlShaalan, Fawaz; Koziarz, Alex; Thornley, Patrick; Alnemari, Haitham; Oitment, Colby; Bharadwaj, Lalita; El-Mughayyar, Dana; Bigney, Erin; Manson, Neil; Abraham, Edward; Small, Chris; Attabib, Najmedden; Richardson, Eden; Kearney, Jill; Kundap, Uday; Investigators, Csorn; Hebert, Jeffrey; Elkaim, Lior M; Levett, Jordan J; Niazi, Farbod; Bokhari, Rakan; Alotaibi, Naif M; Lasry, Oliver J; Bissonnette, Vincent; Yen, David; Muddaluru, Varun S; Gandhi, Pranjan; Mastrolonardo, Alexander; Guha, Daipayan; Pahuta, Markian A; Christie, Sean D; Vandertuin, Trevor; Ritcey, Gillian; Rainham, Daniel; Alhawsawi, Mamdoh; Mumtaz, Rohail; Abdelnour, Mark; Qumquji, Feras; Soroceanu, Alex; Swamy, Ganesh; Thomas, Kenneth; Wai, Eugene; Phan, Philippe; Bhatt, Fenil R; Orosz, Lindsay D; Yamout, Tarek; Good, Christopher R; Schuler, Thomas C; Nguyen, Tiffany; Jazini, Ehsan; Haines, Colin M; Oppermann, Marcelo; Gupta, Shaurya; Ramjist, Joel; Oppermann, Priscila Santos; Yang, Victor XD; Levett, Jordan J; Elkaim, Lior M; Niazi, Farbod; Weber, Michael H; Ioro-Morin, Christian; Bonizzato, Marco; Weil, Alexander G; Oppermann, Marcelo; Ramjist, Joel; Gupta, Shaurya; Oppermann, Priscila S; Yang, Victor XD; Jung, Youngkyung; Muddalaru, Varun; Gandhi, Pranjan; Guha, Daipayan; Koucheki, Robert; Bonello, John-Peter; Abbas, Aazad; Lex, Johnathan R; Nucci, Nicholas; Whyne, Cari; Yee, Albert; Ahn, Henry; Finkelstein, Joel; Larouche, Jeremie; Lewis, Stephen; Toor, Jay; Dhawan, Alaina; Dhawan, Jillian; Sharma, Ajay N; Azzam, Daniel B; Cherry, Ahmed; Fehlings, Michael G; Orosz, Lindsay D; Lee, Nathan J; Yamout, Tarek; Gum, Jeffrey L; Lehman, Ronald A; Poulter, Gregory T; Haines, Colin M; Jazini, Ehsan; Good, Christopher R; Ridha, Barzany B; Persad, Amit; Fourney, Daryl; Byers, Elizabeth; Gallagher, Michelle; Sugar, James; Brown, Justin L; Wang, Zhi; Shen, Jesse; Boubez, Ghassan; Al-Shakfa, Fidaa; Yuh, Sung-Joo; Shedid, Daniel; Rizkallah, Maroun; Singh, Manmohan; Singh, Pankaj Kumar; Lawrence, Peyton Lloyd; Dell, Shevaughn; Goodluck-Tyndall, Ronette; Wade, Kevin; Morgan, Mark; Bruce, Carl; Silva, Yan Gabriel Morais David; Pimenta, Newton; LaRue, Bernard; Aldakhil, Salman; Blanchard, Jocelyn; Couture, Jerome; Goulet, Julien; Bednar, Drew A; Raj, Ruheksh; Urquhart, Jennifer; Bailey, Chris; Christie, Sean D; Greene, Ryan; Chaves, Jennyfer Paulla Galdino; Zarrabian, Mohammed; Sigurdson, Leif; Manoharan, Ragavan; Cherry, Ahmed; Iorio, Carlo; Srikandarajah, Nisaharan; Xu, Mark; Raj, Aditya; Nielsen, Christopher J; Rampersaud, Yoga Raja; Lewis, Stephen J
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Contemporary utilization of three-column osteotomy techniques in a prospective complex spinal deformity multicenter database: implications on full-body alignment and perioperative course.
    (Spine deformity, 2024-06) Williamson, Tyler K; Mir, Jamshaid M; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Demetriades, Andreas K; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Klineberg, Eric O; Bess, Shay; Passias, Peter G; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    Research has focused on the increased correction from a three-column osteotomy (3CO) during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, an in-depth analysis on the performance of a 3CO in a cohort of complex spinal deformity cases has not been described.

    Study design/setting

    This is a retrospective study on a prospectively enrolled, complex ASD database.

    Purpose

    This study aimed to determine if three-column osteotomies demonstrate superior benefit in correction of complex sagittal deformity at the cost of increased perioperative complications.

    Methods

    Surgical complex adult spinal deformity patients were included and grouped into thoracolumbar 3COs compared to those who did not have a 3CO (No 3CO) (remaining cohort). Rigid deformity was defined as ΔLL less than 33% from standing to supine. Severe deformity was defined as global (SVA > 70 mm) or C7-PL > 70 mm, or lumbopelvic (PI-LL > 30°). Means comparison tests assessed correction by 3CO grade/location. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity evaluated outcomes up to six weeks compared to No 3CO.

    Results

    648 patients were included (Mean age 61 ± 14.6 years, BMI 27.55 ± 5.8 kg/m2, levels fused: 12.6 ± 3.8). 126 underwent 3CO, a 20% higher usage than historical cohorts. 3COs were older, frail, and more likely to undergo revision (OR 5.2, 95% CI [2.6-10.6]; p < .001). 3COs were more likely to present with both severe global/lumbopelvic deformity (OR 4), 62.4% being rigid. 3COs had greater use of secondary rods (OR 4st) and incurred 4 times greater risk for: massive blood loss (> 3500 mL), longer LOS, SICU admission, perioperative wound and spine-related complications, and neurologic complications when performed below L3. 3COs had similar HRQL benefit, but higher perioperative opioid use. Mean segmental correction increased by grade (G3-21; G4-24; G5-27) and was 4 × greater than low-grade osteotomies, especially below L3 (OR 12). 3COs achieved 2 × greater spinopelvic correction. Higher grades properly distributed lordosis 50% of the time except L5. Pelvic compensation and non-response were relieved more often with increasing grade, with greater correction in all lower extremity parameters (p < .01). Due to the increased rate of complications, 3COs trended toward higher perioperative cost ($42,806 vs. $40,046, p = .086).

    Conclusion

    Three-column osteotomy usage in contemporary complex spinal deformities is generally limited to more disabled individuals undergoing the most severe sagittal and coronal realignment procedures. While there is an increased perioperative cost and prolongation of length of stay with usage, these techniques represent the most powerful realignment techniques available with a dramatic impact on normalization at operative levels and reciprocal changes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development and Validation of a Multidomain Surgical Complication Classification System for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    (Spine, 2021-02) Klineberg, Eric O; Wick, Joseph B; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Pellise, Ferran; Haddad, Sleiman; Yilgor, Caglar; Núñez-Pereira, Susana; Gupta, Munish; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Ames, Christopher; Bess, Shay; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Berven, Sigurd; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Prospective analysis of example cases.

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and repeatability of a new comprehensive classification system for capturing complications data in adult spinal deformity.

    Summary of background data

    Complications are common in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, no consensus exists on the definition or classification of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. The lack of consensus significantly limits understanding of complications' effects on outcomes in surgery for adult spinal deformity.

    Methods

    Using a Delphi method, members of the International Spine Study Group, AO Spine, and the European Spine Study Group collaborated to develop an adult spinal deformity classification system. The multidomain classification system accounts for medical complications (cancer, cardiopulmonary, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, infectious, musculoskeletal, renal) and surgical complications (implant complications, radiographic complications, neurologic events, intraoperative events, and wound complications). Seventeen individuals ("event readers"), including spine surgeons, trainees, and research coordinators, used the new classification system two separate times to analyze complications in ten example cases. The accuracy and repeatability of the classification system were subsequently calculated based on the providers' responses for the example cases.

    Results

    The 10 example cases included 22 complications. Nearly 95% of complications were captured by >95% of the event readers. The system demonstrated good repeatability of 86.9% between the first and second set of responses provided by event readers.

    Conclusion

    The ISSG-AO Multi-Domain Spinal Deformity Complication Classification System for Adult Spinal Deformity demonstrated good accuracy and repeatability among both surgeons and research coordinators in capturing complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. The ISSG-AO system may be applied to help better understand the impact of complications on outcomes and costs in adult spinal deformity surgery.Level of Evidence: 5.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS).
    (PloS one, 2012-01) Fehlings, Michael G; Vaccaro, Alexander; Wilson, Jefferson R; Singh, Anoushka; W Cadotte, David; Harrop, James S; Aarabi, Bizhan; Shaffrey, Christopher; Dvorak, Marcel; Fisher, Charles; Arnold, Paul; Massicotte, Eric M; Lewis, Stephen; Rampersaud, Raja
    BACKGROUND:There is convincing preclinical evidence that early decompression in the setting of spinal cord injury (SCI) improves neurologic outcomes. However, the effect of early surgical decompression in patients with acute SCI remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of early (<24 hours after injury) versus late (≥ 24 hours after injury) decompressive surgery after traumatic cervical SCI. METHODS:We performed a multicenter, international, prospective cohort study (Surgical Timing In Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study: STASCIS) in adults aged 16-80 with cervical SCI. Enrolment occurred between 2002 and 2009 at 6 North American centers. The primary outcome was ordinal change in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade at 6 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications rates and mortality. FINDINGS:A total of 313 patients with acute cervical SCI were enrolled. Of these, 182 underwent early surgery, at a mean of 14.2(± 5.4) hours, with the remaining 131 having late surgery, at a mean of 48.3(± 29.3) hours. Of the 222 patients with follow-up available at 6 months post injury, 19.8% of patients undergoing early surgery showed a ≥ 2 grade improvement in AIS compared to 8.8% in the late decompression group (OR = 2.57, 95% CI:1.11,5.97). In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for preoperative neurological status and steroid administration, the odds of at least a 2 grade AIS improvement were 2.8 times higher amongst those who underwent early surgery as compared to those who underwent late surgery (OR = 2.83, 95% CI:1.10,7.28). During the 30 day post injury period, there was 1 mortality in both of the surgical groups. Complications occurred in 24.2% of early surgery patients and 30.5% of late surgery patients (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION:Decompression prior to 24 hours after SCI can be performed safely and is associated with improved neurologic outcome, defined as at least a 2 grade AIS improvement at 6 months follow-up.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    External Validation of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) in the Scoli-RISK-1 Patient Database.
    (Spine, 2018-10) Miller, Emily K; Lenke, Lawrence G; Neuman, Brian J; Sciubba, Daniel M; Kebaish, Khaled M; Smith, Justin S; Qiu, Yong; Dahl, Benny T; Pellisé, Ferran; Matsuyama, Yukihiro; Carreon, Leah Y; Fehlings, Michael G; Cheung, Kenneth M; Lewis, Stephen; Dekutoski, Mark B; Schwab, Frank J; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Mehdian, Hossein; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; AOSpine Knowledge Forum Deformity, the International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Analysis of a prospective multicenter database.

    Objective

    To assess the ability of the recently created Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) to predict odds of major complications and length of hospital stay for patients who had more severe preoperative deformity and underwent more invasive ASD surgery compared with patients in the database used to create the index.

    Summary of background data

    Accurate preoperative estimates of risk are necessary given the high complication rates currently associated with ASD surgery.

    Methods

    Patients were enrolled by participating institutions in Europe, Asia, and North America from 2009 to 2011. ASD-FI scores were used to classify 267 patients as not frail (NF) (<0.3), frail (0.3-0. 5), or severely frail (SF) (>0.5). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for preoperative and surgical covariates such as operative time and blood loss, was performed to determine the relationship between ASD-FI category and incidence of major complications, overall incidence of complications, and length of hospital stay.

    Results

    The mean ASD-FI score was 0.3 (range, 0-0.7). We categorized 105 patients as NF, 103 as frail, and 59 as SF. The adjusted odds of developing a major complication were higher for SF patients (odds ratio = 4.4; 95% CI 2.0, 9.9) compared with NF patients. After adjusting for covariates, length of hospital stay for SF patients increased by 19% (95% CI 1.4%, 39%) compared with NF patients. The odds of developing a major complication or having increased length of stay were similar between frail and NF patients.

    Conclusion

    Greater patient frailty, as measured by the ASD-FI, is associated with a longer hospital stay and greater risk of major complications among patients who have severe preoperative deformity and undergo invasive surgical procedures.

    Level of evidence

    2.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Lumbar Lordosis Redistribution and Segmental Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): Does it Matter?
    (Spine, 2024-01) Diebo, Bassel G; Balmaceno-Criss, Mariah; Lafage, Renaud; Daher, Mohammad; Singh, Manjot; Hamilton, D Kojo; Smith, Justin S; Eastlack, Robert K; Fessler, Richard; Gum, Jeffrey L; Gupta, Munish C; Hostin, Richard; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Line, Breton G; Nunley, Pierce D; Mundis, Gregory M; Passias, Peter G; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Turner, Jay; Buell, Thomas; Scheer, Justin K; Mullin, Jeffery; Soroceanu, Alex; Ames, Christopher P; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Lenke, Lawrence G; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas C; Daniels, Alan H; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Study design

    Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

    Objective

    Evaluate the impact of correcting to normative segmental lordosis values on post-operative outcomes.

    Background

    Restoring lumbar lordosis magnitude is crucial in adult spinal deformity surgery, but the optimal location and segmental distribution remains unclear.

    Methods

    Patients were grouped based on offset to normative segmental lordosis values, extracted from recent publications. Matched patients were within 10% of the cohort's mean offset, less than or over 10% were under- and over-corrected. Surgical technique, PROMs, and surgical complications were compared across groups at baseline and 2-year.

    Results

    510 patients with an average age of 64.6, mean CCI 2.08, and average follow-up of 25 months. L4-5 was least likely to be matched (19.1%), while L4-S1 was the most likely (24.3%). More patients were overcorrected at proximal levels (T10-L2; Undercorrected, U: 32.2% vs. Matched, M: 21.7% vs. Overcorrected, O: 46.1%) and undercorrected at distal levels (L4-S1: U: 39.0% vs. M: 24.3% vs. O: 36.8%). Postoperative ODI was comparable across correction groups at all spinal levels except at L4-S1 and T10-L2/L4-S1, where overcorrected patients and matched were better than undercorrected (U: 32.1 vs. M: 25.4 vs. O: 26.5, P=0.005; U: 36.2 vs. M: 24.2 vs. O: 26.8, P=0.001; respectively). Patients overcorrected at T10-L2 experienced higher rates of proximal junctional failure (PJF) (U: 16.0% vs. M: 15.6% vs. O: 32.8%, P<0.001) and had greater posterior inclination of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (U: -9.2±9.4° vs. M: -9.6±9.1° vs. O: -12.2±10.0°, P<0.001), whereas undercorrection at these levels led to higher rates of revision for implant failure (U: 14.2% vs. M: 7.3% vs. O: 6.4%, P=0.025).

    Conclusions

    Patients undergoing fusion for adult spinal deformity suffer higher rates of PJF with overcorrection and increased rates of implant failure with undercorrection based on normative segmental lordosis.

    Level of evidence

    IV.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.
    (Spine, 2016-03) Neuman, Brian J; Baldus, Christine; Zebala, Lukas P; Kelly, Michael P; Shaffrey, Christopher; Edwards, Charles; Koski, Tyler; Schwab, Frank; Glassman, Steven; Parent, Stefan; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Buchowski, Jacob M; Smith, Justin S; Crawford, Charles H; Kim, Han Jo; Lafage, Virginia; Lurie, Jon; Carreon, Leah; Bridwell, Keith H

    Study design

    A prospective study with randomized and observational cohorts.

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to determine baseline variables affecting adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) decision making to participate in randomization (RAND), observational nonsurgical (OBS-NS), or observational surgical (OBS-S) cohorts.

    Summary of background data

    Multiple factors play a key role in a patient's decision to be randomized or to choose an OBS-NS or OBS-S course for ASLS. Studies evaluating these factors are limited.

    Methods

    Eligible candidates (patients with ASLS and no prior spinal fusion deformity surgery) from 9 centers participated in a RAND, OBS-NS, or OBS-S cohort study. Baseline variables (demographics, socioeconomics, patient-reported outcomes [PROs], Functional Treadmill Test, radiographs) were analyzed.

    Results

    Two hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled: 67 RAND, 115 OBS-NS, 113 OBS-S. Subanalysis of older patients (60-80 years) found 54% of OBS-NS had college degrees compared with 82% of RAND and 71% of OBS-S (P = 0.010). Patients deciding to be part of a RAND cohort have similar clinical characteristics to the OBS-S cohort. OBS-S had more symptomatic spinal stenosis (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.029) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of PROs (Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS 6.3 vs. 5.5, P = 0.007]; Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] Pain [2.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.018], Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.019] and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.002]; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [36.9 vs. 31.8, P = 0.029]; post-Treadmill back [5.8 vs. 4.4, P = 0.002] and leg [4.3 vs. 3.1, P = 0.037] pain NRS and larger lumbar coronal Cobb angles (56.5 degrees vs. 48.8 degrees, P < 0.001). RAND had more baseline motor deficits (10.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.036) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of ODI (38.8 vs. 31.8, P = 0.006), SRS Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.034], and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.007].

    Conclusion

    Patients with worse PROs, more back pain, more back and leg pain with ambulation, and larger lumbar Cobb angles are more inclined to select surgical over nonsurgical management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact.
    (Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2024-02) Williamson, Tyler K; Williamson, Tyler K; Dave, Pooja; Mir, Jamshaid M; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Renaud; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Kelly, Michael P; Nunley, Pierce; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Klineberg, Eric O; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Chou, Dean; Fu, Kai-Ming; Bess, Shay; Passias, Peter G; International Spine Study Group
    Achieving spinopelvic realignment during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery does not always produce ideal outcomes. Little is known whether compensation in lower extremities (LEs) plays a role in this disassociation. The objective is to analyze lower extremity compensation after complex ASD surgery, its effect on outcomes, and whether correction can alleviate these mechanisms. We included patients with complex ASD with 6-week data. LE parameters were as follows: sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle. Each parameter was ranked, and upper tertile was deemed compensation. Patients compensating and not compensating postoperatively were propensity score matched for body mass index, frailty, and T1 pelvic angle. Linear regression assessed correlation between LE parameters and baseline deformity, demographics, and surgical details. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity and history of total knee/hip arthroplasty evaluated outcomes. Two hundred and ten patients (age: 61.3 ± 14.1 years, body mass index: 27.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.1 ± 1.6, 72% female, 22% previous total joint arthroplasty, 24% osteoporosis, levels fused: 13.1 ± 3.8) were included. At baseline, 59% were compensating in LE: 32% at hips, 39% knees, and 36% ankles. After correction, 61% were compensating at least one joint. Patients undercorrected postoperatively were less likely to relieve LE compensation (odds ratio: 0.2, P = .037). Patients compensating in LE were more often undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and T1 pelvic angle and disproportioned in Global Alignment and Proportion (P < .05). Patients matched in sagittal age-adjusted score at 6 weeks but compensating in LE were more likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (odds ratio: 4.1, P = .009) and proximal junctional failure (8% vs 0%, P = .035) than those sagittal age-adjusted score-matched and not compensating in LE. Perioperative lower extremity compensation was a product of undercorrecting complex ASD. Even in age-adjusted realignment, compensation was associated with global undercorrection and junctional failure. Consideration of lower extremities during planning is vital to avoid adverse outcomes in perioperative course after complex ASD surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-01) Dave, Pooja; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Mir, Jamshaid; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Buell, Thomas; Than, Khoi D; Fu, Kai-Ming; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Mundis, Gregory; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Nunley, Pierce; Chou, Dean; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas C; Passias, Peter G
    The objective was to determine the degree of regional decompensation to pelvic tilt (PT) normalization after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Operative ASD patients with 1 year of PT measurements were included. Patients with normalized PT at baseline were excluded. Predicted PT was compared to actual PT, tested for change from baseline, and then compared against age-adjusted, Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores. Lower-extremity (LE) parameters included the cranial-hip-sacrum angle, cranial-knee-sacrum angle, and cranial-ankle-sacrum angle. LE compensation was set as the 1-year upper tertile compared with intraoperative baseline. Univariate analyses were used to compare normalized and nonnormalized data against alignment outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model consisting of significant predictors for normalization related to regional compensation. In total, 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean ± SD age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.9 ± 1.6). Patients with normalized PT were more likely to have overcorrected pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). GAP score at 6 weeks was greater for patients with nonnormalized PT (0.6 vs 1.3, p = 0.08). At baseline, 58.5% of patients had compensation in the thoracic and cervical regions. Postoperatively, compensation was maintained by 42% with no change after matching in age-adjusted or GAP score. The patients with nonnormalized PT had increased rates of thoracic and cervical compensation (p < 0.05). Compensation in thoracic kyphosis differed between patients with normalized PT at 6 weeks and those with normalized PT at 1 year (69% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Those who compensated had increased rates of implant complications by 1 year (OR [95% CI] 2.08 [1.32-6.56], p < 0.05). Cervical compensation was maintained at 6 weeks and 1 year (56% vs 43%, p = 0.12), with no difference in implant complications (OR 1.31 [95% CI -2.34 to 1.03], p = 0.09). For the lower extremities at baseline, 61% were compensating. Matching age-adjusted alignment did not eliminate compensation at any joint (all p > 0.05). Patients with nonnormalized PT had higher rates of LE compensation across joints (all p < 0.01). Overall, patients with normalized PT at 1 year had the greatest odds of resolving LE compensation (OR 9.6, p < 0.001). Patients with normalized PT at 1 year had lower rates of implant failure (8.9% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), rod breakage (1.3% vs 13.8%, p < 0.05), and pseudarthrosis (0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.05) compared with patients with nonnormalized PT. The complication rate was significantly lower for patients with normalized PT at 1 year (56.7% vs 66.1%, p = 0.02), despite comparable health-related quality of life scores. Patients with PT normalization had greater rates of resolution in thoracic and LE compensation, leading to lower rates of complications by 1 year. Thus, consideration of both the lower extremities and thoracic regions in surgical planning is vital to preventing adverse outcomes and maintaining pelvic alignment.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Quantifying the Contribution of Lower Limb Compensation to Upright Posture: What Happens if Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Do Not Compensate?
    (Spine, 2023-03) Lafage, Renaud; Duvvuri, Priya; Elysee, Jonathan; Diebo, Bassel; Bess, Shay; Burton, Douglas; Daniels, Alan; Gupta, Munish; Hostin, Richard; Kebaish, Khaled; Kelly, Michael; Kim, Han Jo; Klineberg, Eric; Lenke, Lawrence; Lewis, Stephen; Ames, Christopher; Passias, Peter; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study.

    Objective

    This study tests the hypothesis that elimination of lower limb compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) will significantly increase the magnitude of sagittal malalignment.

    Summary of background data

    ASD affects a significant proportion of the elderly population, impairing functional sagittal alignment and inhibiting overall quality of life. To counteract these effects, patients with ASD use their spine, pelvis, and lower limbs to create a compensatory posture that allows for standing and mobility. However, the degree to which each of the hips, knees, and ankles contributes to these compensatory mechanisms has yet to be determined.

    Methods

    Patients undergoing corrective surgery for ASD were included if they met at least one of the following criteria: complex surgical procedure, geriatric deformity surgery, or severe radiographic deformity. Preoperative full-body x-rays were evaluated, and age and PI-adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three positions: compensated (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), partially compensated (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, with maintained hip extension), and uncompensated (ankle, knee, and hip compensation set to the age and PI norms).

    Results

    288 patients were included (mean age 60 y, 70.5% females). As the model transitioned from the compensated to uncompensated position, initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation versus the ankle (P.Shift: 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (PT: 24.1 to 16.1), hip extension (SFA: 203 to 200), knee flexion (KA: 5.5 to-0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (AA: 5.3 to 3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased: SVA (65 to 120 mm) and G-SVA (C7-Ankle from 36 to 127 mm).

    Conclusion

    Removal of lower limbs compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with two-fold greater SVA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Serious Adverse Events Significantly Reduce Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up: Nonoperative, Multicenter, Prospective NIH Study of 105 Patients.
    (Spine, 2018-06) Pugely, Andrew J; Kelly, Michael P; Baldus, Christine R; Gao, Yubo; Zebala, Lukas; Shaffrey, Christopher; Glassman, Steven; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Parent, Stefan; Lewis, Stephen; Koski, Tyler; Edwards, Charles; Schwab, Frank; Bridwell, Keith H

    Study design

    This is an analysis of a prospective 2-year study on nonoperative patients enrolled in the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis (ASLS) National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) trial.

    Objective

    The purpose was to evaluate the impact of serious adverse events (SAEs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in nonoperative management of ASLS as measured by Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at 2-year follow-up.

    Summary of background data

    Little is known about PROs in the nonoperative management of ASLS or the prevalence and impact of SAEs on PROs.

    Methods

    The ASLS trial dataset was analyzed to identify adult lumbar scoliosis patients electively choosing or randomly assigned to nonoperative treatment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data were collected prospectively from 2010 to 2015 as part of NIAMS R01-AR055176-01A2 "A Multi-Centered Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Adult Scoliosis." SAEs were defined as life-threatening medical events, new significant or permanent disability, new or prolonged hospitalization, or death.

    Results

    One hundred five nonoperative patients were studied to 2-year follow-up. Twenty-seven patients (25.7%) had 42 SAEs; 15 (14.3%) had a SAE during the first year. The SAE group had higher body mass index (29.4 vs. 25.2; P = 0.008) and reported worse SRS-22 Function scores than the non-SAE group at baseline (3.3 vs. 3.6; P = 0.024). At 2-year follow-up, SAE patients experienced less improvement (change) in SRS-22 Self-Image (-0.07 vs. 0.26; P = 0.018) and Mental Health domains (-0.19 vs. 0.25; P = 0.002) than non-SAE patients and had lower SRS-22 Function, Self-Image, Subscore, and SF-12 Mental and Physical component scores (MCS/PCS). Fewer SAE patients reached minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold in SRS-22 Mental Health (14.8% vs. 43.6%; P = 0.01).

    Conclusion

    A high percentage (25.7%) of ASLS patients managed nonoperatively experienced SAEs. Those patients who sustained a SAE had less improvement in reported outcomes.

    Level of evidence

    2.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The impact of facet dislocation on clinical outcomes after cervical spinal cord injury: results of a multicenter North American prospective cohort study.
    (Spine, 2013-01) Wilson, Jefferson R; Vaccaro, Alexander; Harrop, James S; Aarabi, Bizhan; Shaffrey, Christopher; Dvorak, Marcel; Fisher, Charles; Arnold, Paul; Massicotte, Eric M; Lewis, Stephen; Rampersaud, Raja; Okonkwo, David O; Fehlings, Michael G

    Study design

    A multicenter prospective cohort study.

    Objective

    To define differences in baseline characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with and without facet dislocation (FD).

    Summary of background data

    Reports of dramatic neurological improvement in patients with FD and cervical SCI, treated with rapid reduction have led to the hypothesis that this represents a subgroup of patients with significant recovery potential. However, without a large systematic comparative analysis, this hypothesis remains untested.

    Methods

    Patients were classified into FD and non-FD groups based on imaging investigations at admission. The primary outcome was change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (AMS) at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade conversion and functional independence measure score at 1-year postinjury, as well as length of acute hospitalization. Baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes were also compared for patients with unilateral and bilateral FD.

    Results

    Of 421 patients who enrolled, 135 (32.1%) had FD and 286 (67.9%) had no FD. Patients in the FD group presented with a significantly worse AIS grade and higher energy injury mechanisms (P < 0.01). Patients with bilateral FD had a greater severity of baseline neurological deficit compared with those with unilateral FD, measured by AIS grade and AMS. The mean length of acute hospitalization was 41.2 days among patients with FD and 30 days among patients without FD (P = 0.04). At 1-year follow-up, patients with FD experienced a mean AMS improvement of 18.0 points, whereas patients without FD experienced an improvement of 27.9 points (P < 0.01). In the adjusted analysis, patients with FD continued to demonstrate less AMS recovery compared with the patients without FD (P = 0.04).

    Conclusion

    Compared with patients without FD, cervical SCI patients with FD tended to present with a more severe degree of initial injury and displayed less potential for motor recovery at 1-year follow-up.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    What is the Optimal Surgical Method for Achieving Correction and Avoiding Neurological Complications in Pediatric High-grade Spondylolisthesis?
    (Journal of pediatric orthopedics, 2021-03) Rocos, Brett; Strantzas, Samuel; Zeller, Reinhard; Lewis, Stephen; Tan, Tony; Lebel, David

    Background

    Controversy persists in the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). Surgery is recommended in patients with intrusive symptoms and evidence debates the competing strategies. This study compares the radiologic outcomes and postoperative complications at a minimum of 2 years follow-up for patients with HGS treated with instrumented fusion with partial reduction (IFIS) with those treated with reduction, decompression, and instrumented fusion (RIF). We hypothesize that IFIS leads to a lower rate of complication and revision surgery than RIF.

    Methods

    A retrospective comparative methodology was used to analyze consecutive HGS treated surgically between 2006 and 2017. Patients diagnosed with ≥grade 3 spondylolisthesis treated with arthrodesis before the age of 18 years with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if surgery did not aim to achieve arthrodesis or was a revision procedure. Cases were identified through departmental and neurophysiological records.

    Results

    Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 4 years. Ten patients underwent IFIS and the remaining 20 underwent RIF. The 2 groups showed no difference in demographics, grade of slip, deformity or presenting symptoms. Of 10 treated with IFIS, the SA reduced by a mean of 10 degrees and C7 sagittal vertical line changed by 31 mm. In the RIF cohort, SA reduced by 16 degrees and C7 sagittal vertical line reduced by 26 mm. PT was unchanged in both groups. In IFIS cohort, 2 patients showed postoperative weakness, resolved by 2 years. None required revision surgery. In the RIF group, 4 sustained dural tears and 1 a laminar fracture, 7 showed postoperative weakness or dysaesthesia, 3 of which had not resolved by 2 years. Eight patients underwent unplanned further surgery, 3 for pseudarthrosis.

    Conclusions

    RIF and IFIS show similar radiologic outcomes. RIF shows a higher rate of unplanned return to surgery, pseudarthrosis and persisting neurological changes.

    Level of evidence

    Level III-retrospective comparative study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    When is staging complex adult spinal deformity advantageous? Identifying subsets of patients who benefit from staged interventions.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-11) Passias, Peter G; Tretiakov, Peter; Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O; Das, Ankita; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Nayak, Pratibha; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Buell, Thomas J; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Mundis, Gregory M; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Chou, Dean; Fu, Kai-Ming; Than, Khoi D; Anand, Neel; Okonkwo, David O; Wang, Michael Y; Klineberg, Eric; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Hostin, Richard; Gupta, Munish; Lenke, Lawrence; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas

    Objective

    The objective of this study was to identify baseline patient and surgical factors predictive of optimal outcomes in staged versus same-day combined-approach surgery.

    Methods

    Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with baseline and perioperative (by 6 weeks) data were stratified based on single-stage (same-day) or multistage (staged) surgery, excluding planned multiple hospitalizations. Means comparison analyses were used to assess baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical differences between cohorts. Backstep logistic regression and conditional inference tree analysis were used to identify variable thresholds associated with study-specific definitions of an optimal outcome in each cohort, defined as no intraoperative or surgery-related in-hospital adverse event.

    Results

    There were 439 patients with complex ASD in the dataset (mean age 64.0 ± 9.3 years, 68% female, mean BMI 28.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2). Overall, 58.8% of patients were in the same-day group, while 41.2% were in the staged group. Demographically, cohorts were not significantly different (p > 0.05), but staged patients were more frail per total Edmonton Frail Scale score (p = 0.043). Staged patients also reported greater numeric rating scale scores for back pain than same-day patients (p = 0.002). Cohorts were comparable in magnitude of planned correction of C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, and T4-12 kyphosis (all p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline age, frailty, and number of levels fused, staged patients reported significantly higher PROMIS Discretionary Social Activities scores by 6 weeks (p = 0.029). Radiographic outcomes by 6 weeks were comparable between cohorts, in terms of both magnitude of change from baseline and overall result (all p > 0.05). Same-day patients were significantly more likely to experience in-hospital complications (p = 0.013). When considering frailty thresholds for staging, only a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 1.0 was associated with optimal outcome in same-day patients, while Edmonton Frail Scale score ≥ 7 (p = 0.036), ≥ 9 levels fused (p = 0.016), and baseline PI-LL mismatch ≥ 15.3° (p = 0.028) were associated with optimal outcome for staged patients. Yet, staging alone was not significantly associated with an optimal outcome perioperatively (p = 0.056).

    Conclusions

    While staged and same-day combined-approach surgeries yield comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes, certain subsets of complex ASD patients may benefit from staged surgery despite the invariably increased hospital length of stay. Individuals with increased frailty, moderate to severe PI-LL mismatch, and increased anticipated number of levels fused may experience a lower risk of perioperative adverse events if they undergo a staged procedure. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT04194138 (ClinicalTrials.gov).