Browsing by Author "Lidsky, Michael E"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Multimodal Therapy.
    (Surgical oncology clinics of North America, 2023-01) Aykut, Berk; Lidsky, Michael E
    Despite a steady decline in incidence and mortality rates, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most common cancer diagnosis in women and the third most common in men worldwide. Notably, the liver is recognized as the most common site of CRC metastasis, and metastases to the liver remain the primary driver of disease-specific mortality for patients with CRC. Although hepatic resection is the backbone of curative-intent treatment, management of CRLM has become increasingly multimodal during the last decade and includes the use of downstaging chemotherapy, ablation techniques, and locoregional therapy, each of which are reviewed herein.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparing Survival After Resection, Ablation, and Radiation in Small Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
    (Annals of surgical oncology, 2023-10) Masoud, Sabran J; Rhodin, Kristen E; Kanu, Elishama; Bao, Jiayin; Eckhoff, Austin M; Bartholomew, Alex J; Howell, Thomas C; Aykut, Berk; Kosovec, Juliann E; Palta, Manisha; Befera, Nicholas T; Kim, Charles Y; Herbert, Garth; Shah, Kevin N; Nussbaum, Daniel P; Blazer, Dan G; Zani, Sabino; Allen, Peter J; Lidsky, Michael E

    Background

    Hepatectomy is the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, in patients unable to be resected, data comparing efficacy of alternatives including thermal ablation and radiation therapy (RT) remain limited. Herein, we compared survival between resection and other liver-directed therapies for small ICC within a national cancer registry.

    Patients and methods

    Patients with clinical stage I-III ICC < 3 cm diagnosed 2010-2018 who underwent resection, ablation, or RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.

    Results

    Of 545 patients, 297 (54.5%) underwent resection, 114 (20.9%) ablation, and 134 (24.6%) RT. Median OS was similar between resection and ablation [50.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.5-73.9; 39.5 months, 95% CI 28.7-58.4, p = 0.14], both exceeding that of RT (20.9 months, 95% CI 14.1-28.3). RT patients had high rates of stage III disease (10.4% RT vs. 1.8% ablation vs. 11.8% resection, p < 0.001), but the lowest rates of chemotherapy utilization (9.0% RT vs. 15.8% ablation vs. 38.7% resection, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, resection and ablation were associated with reduced mortality compared with RT [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58 and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, p < 0.001, respectively].

    Conclusion

    Resection and ablation were associated with improved survival in patients with ICC < 3 cm compared with RT. Acknowledging confounders, anatomic constraints of ablation, limitations of available data, and need for prospective study, these results favor ablation in small ICC where resection is not feasible.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Impact of primary tumor resection and metastasectomy among gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases only on survival.
    (HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2023-09) Chen, Qichen; Li, Kan; Rhodin, Kristen E; Bartholomew, Alex J; Lidsky, Michael E; Wei, Qingyi; Cai, Jianqiang; Luo, Sheng; Zhao, Hong

    Background

    Despite recommendations for primary tumor resection (PTR) with or without liver resection (LR) in the patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and isolated liver metastases, there are conflicting data for their impact on overall survival (OS).

    Methods

    2320 patients with GEP-NETs and isolated liver metastases were identified from NCDB. Multiple imputations were used to accommodate missing data, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to minimize bias.

    Results

    Patients with PTR had a greater OS than those without PTR (3-year rate of 88.6% vs. 69.9%, P < 0.001), which was preserved in the adjusted analysis (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.264-0.567; P < 0.001). Patients with LR had a greater OS than those without LR (3-year rate 87.7% vs. 75.2%, P = 0.003), which was also preserved in adjusted analysis (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.450, 95% CI: 0.229-0.885; P = 0.021). Patients undergoing both PTR and LR had the greatest survival advantage than those with other surgical interventions (P < 0.001).

    Conclusions

    Either PTR or LR is associated with improved survival for GEP-NET patients with isolated liver metastases. However, there remains significant selection bias in the current study, and caution should be exercised when selecting patients for resection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
    (HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2023-06) Chen, Qichen; Rhodin, Kristen E; Li, Kan; Kanu, Elishama; Zani, Sabino; Lidsky, Michael E; Zhao, Jianjun; Wei, Qingyi; Luo, Sheng; Zhao, Hong

    Background

    Literature is lacking on the impact of advancements in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on outcomes for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs). Herein, we compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes among patients with GEP-NECs undergoing open, laparoscopic, and robotic resection.

    Methods

    Patients with GEP-NECs diagnosed 2010-2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for selection bias. Patients were stratified by surgical approach; and pairwise comparisons were conducted by analyzing short- and long-term outcomes.

    Results

    Receipt of MIS increased from 34.2% in 2010 to 67.5 % in 2019. Altogether, 6560 patients met study criteria: 3444 (52.5%) underwent open resection, 2783 (42.4%) underwent laparoscopic resection and 333 (5.1%) underwent robotic resection. Compared with open resection, laparoscopic or robotic resection were associated with shorter post-operative length of stay, reduced 30-day and 90-day post-operative mortality, and prolonged overall survival (OS). Compared with laparoscopic resection, robotic resection was associated with reduced 90-day post-operative mortality, however, there was no significant difference in OS.

    Conclusion

    This NCDB analysis demonstrates that MIS approaches for treating GEP-NECs have become more common, with improved perioperative mortality, shorter post-operative length of stay and favorable OS, compared with open resection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Primary tumor resection improves survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with nonresected liver metastases.
    (Journal of surgical oncology, 2023-02) Chen, Qichen; Li, Kan; Rhodin, Kristen E; Masoud, Sabran J; Lidsky, Michael E; Cai, Jianqiang; Wei, Qingyi; Luo, Sheng; Zhao, Hong

    Background

    The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) patients with liver metastases only remains poorly defined. Therefore, we investigated the impact of PTR on the survival of GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases.

    Methods

    GI-NEC patients with a liver-confined metastatic disease diagnosed between 2016 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputations by chained equations were used to account for missing data, and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to eliminate selection bias. Overall survival (OS) was compared by adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test with IPTW.

    Results

    A total of 767 GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases were identified. Among all patients, 177 (23.1%) received PTR and had a significantly favorable OS before (median: 43.6 months [interquartile range, IQR, 10.3-64.4] vs. 8.8 months [IQR, 2.1-23.1], p < 0.001 in log-rank test) and after (median: 25.7 months [IQR, 10.0-64.4] vs. 9.3 months [IQR, 2.2-26.4], p < 0.001 in IPTW-adjusted log-rank test) the IPTW adjustment. Additionally, this survival advantage persisted in an adjusted Cox model (IPTW adjusted hazard ratio = 0.431, 95% confidence interval: 0.332-0.560; p < 0.001). The improved survival persisted in subgroups stratified by primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage, even in the complete cohort (excluding patients with missing data).

    Conclusions

    PTR led to improved survival for GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases regardless of primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage. However, the decision for PTR should be made on an individualized basis following multidisciplinary evaluation.