Browsing by Author "Line, Breton"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 20 of 77
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A Risk-Benefit Analysis of Increasing Surgical Invasiveness Relative to Frailty Status in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
    (Spine, 2021-08) Passias, Peter G; Brown, Avery E; Bortz, Cole; Pierce, Katherine; Alas, Haddy; Ahmad, Waleed; Passfall, Lara; Kummer, Nicholas; Krol, Oscar; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas; Hart, Robert; Anand, Neel; Mundis, Gregory; Neuman, Brian; Line, Breton; Shaffrey, Christopher; Klineberg, Eric; Smith, Justin; Ames, Christopher; Schwab, Frank J; Bess, Shay; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Retrospective review of a prospectively enrolled multicenter Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    Investigate invasiveness and outcomes of ASD surgery by frailty state.

    Summary of background data

    The ASD Invasiveness Index incorporates deformity-specific components to assess correction magnitude. Intersections of invasiveness, surgical outcomes, and frailty state are understudied.

    Methods

    ASD patients with baseline and 3-year (3Y) data were included. Logistic regression analyzed the relationship between increasing invasiveness and major complications or reoperations and meeting minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for health-related quality-of-life measures at 3Y. Decision tree analysis assessed invasiveness risk-benefit cutoff points, above which experiencing complications or reoperations and not reaching MCID were higher. Significance was set to P < 0.05.

    Results

    Overall, 195 of 322 patients were included. Baseline demographics: age 59.9 ± 14.4, 75% female, BMI 27.8 ± 6.2, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.7 ± 1.7. Surgical information: 61% osteotomy, 52% decompression, 11.0 ± 4.1 levels fused. There were 98 not frail (NF), 65 frail (F), and 30 severely frail (SF) patients. Relationships were found between increasing invasiveness and experiencing a major complication or reoperation for the entire cohort and by frailty group (all P < 0.05). Defining a favorable outcome as no major complications or reoperation and meeting MCID in any health-related quality of life at 3Y established an invasiveness cutoff of 63.9. Patients below this threshold were 1.8[1.38-2.35] (P < 0.001) times more likely to achieve favorable outcome. For NF patients, the cutoff was 79.3 (2.11[1.39-3.20] (P < 0.001), 111 for F (2.62 [1.70-4.06] (P < 0.001), and 53.3 for SF (2.35[0.78-7.13] (P = 0.13).

    Conclusion

    Increasing invasiveness is associated with increased odds of major complications and reoperations. Risk-benefit cutoffs for successful outcomes were 79.3 for NF, 111 for F, and 53.3 for SF patients. Above these, increasing invasiveness has increasing risk of major complications or reoperations and not meeting MCID at 3Y.Level of Evidence: 3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Have Higher Baseline Frailty, Disability, and Comorbidities Compared With Complex Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study of 616 Patients.
    (Global spine journal, 2023-11) Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Ben-Israel, David; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khal; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Eastlack, Robert; Daniels, Alan; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Burton, Douglas; Ames, Christopher P; Bess, Shay; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Multicenter comparative cohort.

    Objective

    Studies have shown markedly higher rates of complications and all-cause mortality following surgery for adult cervical deformity (ACD) compared with adult thoracolumbar deformity (ATLD), though the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Our objectives were to compare baseline frailty, disability, and comorbidities between ACD and complex ATLD patients undergoing surgery.

    Methods

    Two multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity registries were queried, one ATLD and one ACD. Baseline clinical and frailty measures were compared between the cohorts.

    Results

    616 patients were identified (107 ACD and 509 ATLD). These groups had similar mean age (64.6 vs 60.8 years, respectively, P = .07). ACD patients were less likely to be women (51.9% vs 69.5%, P < .001) and had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.5 vs .9, P < .001) and ASA grade (2.7 vs 2.4, P < .001). ACD patients had worse VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS, 25.7 vs 29.9, P < .001) and PROMIS Physical Function Score (33.3 vs 35.3, P = .031). All frailty measures were significantly worse for ACD patients, including hand dynamometer (44.6 vs 55.6 lbs, P < .001), CSHA Clinical Frailty Score (CFS, 4.0 vs 3.2, P < .001), and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS, 5.15 vs 3.21, P < .001). Greater proportions of ACD patients were frail (22.9% vs 5.7%) or vulnerable (15.6% vs 10.9%) based on EFS (P < .001).

    Conclusions

    Compared with ATLD patients, ACD patients had worse baseline characteristics on all measures assessed (comorbidities/disability/frailty). These differences may help account for greater risk of complications and all-cause mortality previously observed in ACD patients and facilitate strategies for better preoperative optimization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Alignment Targets, Curve Proportion and Mechanical Loading: Preliminary Analysis of an Ideal Shape Toward Reducing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.
    (Global spine journal, 2022-07) Katsuura, Yoshihiro; Lafage, Renaud; Kim, Han Jo; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Shaffrey, Christopher; Burton, Douglas C; Ames, Christopher P; Mundis, Gregory M; Hostin, Richard; Bess, Shay; Klineberg, Eric O; Passias, Peter G; Lafage, Virginie; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Study design

    Retrospective cohort study.

    Objective

    Investigate risk factors for PJK including theoretical kyphosis, mechanical loading at the UIV and age adjusted offset alignment.

    Methods

    373 ASD patients (62.7 yrs ± 9.9; 81%F) with 2-year follow up and UIV of at least L1 and LIV of sacrum were included. Images of patients without PJK, with PJK and with PJF were compared using standard spinopelvic parameters before and after the application of the validated virtual alignment method which corrects for the compensatory mechanisms of PJK. Age-adjusted offset, theoretical thoracic kyphosis and mechanical loading at the UIV were then calculated and compared between groups. A subanalysis was performed based on the location of the UIV (upper thoracic (UT) vs. Lower thoracic (LT)).

    Results

    At 2-years 172 (46.1%) had PJK, and 21 (5.6%) developed PJF. As PJK severity increased, the post-operative global alignment became more posterior secondary to increased over-correction of PT, PI-LL, and SVA (all P < 0.005). Also, a larger under correction of the theoretical TK (flattening) and a smaller bending moment at the UIV (underloading of UIV) was found. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PI-LL and bending moment offsets from normative values were independent predictors of PJK/PJF in UT group; PT and bending moment difference were independent predictors for LT group.

    Conclusions

    Spinopelvic over correction, under correction of TK (flattening), and under loading of the UIV (decreased bending moment) were associated with PJK and PJF. These differences are often missed when compensation for PJK is not accounted for in post-operative radiographs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?
    (JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024) Mullin, Jeffrey P; Soliman, Mohamed AR; Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter G; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khaled; Eastlack, Robert K; Daniels, Alan H; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish C; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-03) Mullin, Jeffrey P; Soliman, Mohamed AR; Smith, Justin S; Kelly, Michael P; Buell, Thomas J; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Line, Breton; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Klineberg, Eric; Kim, Han Jo; Passias, Peter G; Gum, Jeffrey L; Kebaish, Khaled; Eastlack, Robert K; Daniels, Alan H; Soroceanu, Alex; Mundis, Gregory; Hostin, Richard; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gupta, Munish C; Lewis, Stephen J; Schwab, Frank J; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas

    Objective

    Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors.

    Methods

    Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA.

    Results

    Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications.

    Conclusions

    Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
    (Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-08) Passias, Peter G; Williamson, Tyler K; Mir, Jamshaid M; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Line, Breton; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Hamilton, David Kojo; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Mundis, Gregory M; Diebo, Bassel; Kebaish, Khaled M; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Klineberg, Eric O; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Schwab, Frank J; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; On Behalf Of The International Spine Study Group

    Background

    While reimbursement is centered on 90-day outcomes, many patients may still achieve optimal, long-term outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite transient short-term complications.

    Objective

    Compare long-term clinical success and cost-utility between patients achieving optimal realignment and suboptimally aligned peers.

    Study design/setting

    Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database.

    Methods

    ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data included. Groups were propensity score matched (PSM) for age, frailty, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline deformity. Optimal radiographic criteria are defined as meeting low deformity in all three (Scoliosis Research Society) SRS-Schwab parameters or being proportioned in Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP). Cost-per-QALY was calculated for each time point. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) adjusting for baseline disability and deformity (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL)) were used to determine the significance of surgical details, complications, clinical outcomes, and cost-utility.

    Results

    A total of 930 patients were considered. Following PSM, 253 "optimal" (O) and 253 "not optimal" (NO) patients were assessed. The O group underwent more invasive procedures and had more levels fused. Analysis of complications by two years showed that the O group suffered less overall major (38% vs. 52%, p = 0.021) and major mechanical complications (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.002), and less reoperations (23% vs. 33%, p = 0.008). Adjusted analysis revealed O patients more often met MCID (minimal clinically important difference) in SF-36 PCS, SRS-22 Pain, and Appearance. Cost-utility-adjusted analysis determined that the O group generated better cost-utility by one year and maintained lower overall cost and costs per QALY (both p < 0.001) at two years.

    Conclusions

    Fewer late complications (mechanical and reoperations) are seen in optimally aligned patients, leading to better long-term cost-utility overall. Therefore, the current focus on avoiding short-term complications may be counterproductive, as achieving optimal surgical correction is critical for long-term success.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Assessment of Patient Outcomes and Proximal Junctional Failure Rate of Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Undergoing Caudal Extension of Previous Spinal Fusion.
    (World neurosurgery, 2020-04-16) Daniels, Alan H; Reid, Daniel BC; Durand, Wesley M; Line, Breton; Passias, Peter; Kim, Han Jo; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; LaFage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Gupta, Munish; Klineberg, Eric; Schwab, Frank; Burton, Doug; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher; Hart, Robert A; International Spine Study Group
    OBJECT:This case series examined patients undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion without alteration of the prior UIV to assess patient outcomes and rates of PJK/PJF. METHODS:Patients eligible for 2-year minimum follow-up undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion with unchanged UIVs were identified. These patients were evaluated for PJK/PJF, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. RESULTS:In total, 40 patients were included. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 years (SD 0.3). Patients in this cohort had poor preoperative sagittal alignment (PI-LL 26.7°, TPA 29.0°, SVA 93.4mm) and achieved substantial sagittal correction (ΔSVA -62.2mm, ΔPI-LL -19.8°, ΔTPA -11.1°) following caudal extension surgery. At final follow-up, there was a 0% rate of PJF among patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusion without creation of a new UIV, but 27.5% of patients experienced PJK. Patients experienced significant improvement in both ODI and SRS-22r total score at 2-years post-operatively (p<0.05). In total, 7.5% (n=3) of patients underwent further revision, at an average of 1.1 years (SD 0.54) after the surgery with unaltered UIV. All three of these patients underwent revision for rod fracture with no revisions for PJK/PJF. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusions for sagittal alignment correction have high rates of clinical success, low revision surgery rates, and very low rates of PJF. Minimizing repetitive tissue trauma at the UIV may result in decreased PJF risk, as the PJF rate in this cohort of unaltered UIV patients is below historical PJF rates of patients undergoing sagittal balance correction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?
    (Spine, 2021-10) Passias, Peter G; Pierce, Katherine E; Naessig, Sara; Ahmad, Waleed; Passfall, Lara; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Kim, Han Jo; Daniels, Alan; Eastlack, Robert; Klineberg, Eric; Line, Breton; Mummaneni, Praveen; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Retrospective cohort study.

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of cervical to thoracolumbar ratios on poor outcomes in cervical deformity (CD) corrective surgery.

    Summary of background data

    Consideration of distal regional and global alignment is a critical determinant of outcomes in CD surgery. For operative CD patients, it is unknown whether certain thoracolumbar parameters play a significant role in poor outcomes and whether addressing such parameters is warranted.

    Methods

    Included: surgical CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb >10°, cervical lordosis [CL] >10°, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) >4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25°) with baseline and 1-year data. Patients were assessed for ratios of preop cervical and global parameters including: C2 Slope/T1 slope, T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (TS-CL)/mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), cSVA/sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Deformity classification ratios of cervical (Ames-ISSG) to spinopelvic (SRS-Schwab) were investigated: cSVA modifier/SVA modifier, TS-CL modifier/PI-LL modifier. Cervical to thoracic ratios included C2-C7 lordosis/T4-T12 kyphosis. Correlations assessed the relationship between ratios and poor outcomes (major complication, reoperation, distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), or failure to meet minimal clinically important difference [MCID]). Decision tree analysis through multiple iterations of multivariate regressions assessed cut-offs for ratios for acquiring suboptimal outcomes.

    Results

    A total of 110 CD patients were included (61.5 years, 66% F, 28.8 kg/m2). Mean preoperative radiographic ratios calculated: C2 slope/T1 slope of 1.56, TS-CL/PI-LL of 11.1, cSVA/SVA of 5.4, CL/thoracic kyphosis (TK) of 0.26. Ames-ISSG and SRS-Schwab modifier ratios: cSVA/SVA of 0.1 and TS-CL/PI-LL of 0.35. Pearson correlations demonstrated a relationship between major complications and baseline TS-CL/PI-LL, Ames TS-CL/Schwab PI-LL modifiers, and the CL/TK ratios (P < 0.050). Reoperation had significant correlation with TS-CL/PI-LL and cSVA/SVA ratios. Postoperative DJK correlated with C2 slope/T1 slope and CL/TK ratios. Not meeting MCID for Neck Disability Index (NDI) correlated with CL/TK ratio and not meeting MCID for EQ5D correlated with Ames TS-CL/Schwab PI-LL.

    Conclusion

    Consideration of cervical to global alignment is a critical determinant of outcomes in CD corrective surgery. Key ratios of cervical to global alignment correlate with suboptimal clinical outcomes. A larger cervical lordosis to TK predicted postoperative complication, DJK, and not meeting MCID for NDI.Level of Evidence: 4.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes
    (Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine, 2022-07-01) Passias, Peter Gust; Alas, Haddy; Kummer, Nicholas; Tretiakov, Peter; Diebo, Bassel G; Lafage, Renaud; Ames, Christopher P; Line, Breton; Klineberg, Eric O; Burton, Douglas C; Uribe, Juan S; Kim, Han Jo; Daniels, Alan H; Bess, Shay; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Mundis, Gregory M; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie; International Spine Study Group
    Background: Patients with symptomatic cervical deformity (CD) requiring surgical correction often present with hyperkyphosis (HK), although patients with hyperlordotic curves may require surgery as well. Few studies have investigated differences in CD corrective surgery with regard to HK and hyperlordosis (HL). Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate patterns in treatment for CD patients with baseline (BL) HK and HL and understand how extreme curvature of the spine may influence surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Operative CD patients with BL and 1-year (1Y) radiographic data were included in the study. Patients were stratified based on BL C2-C7 lordosis (CL) angle: those >1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean (-6.96 ± 21.47°) were hyperlordotic (>14.51°) or hyperkyphotic (<-28.43°) depending on directionality. Patients within 1SD were considered control group. Results: 102 surgical CD patients (61 years, 65% F, 30 kg/m 2) with BL and 1Y radiographic data were included. 20 patients met definitions for HK and 21 patients met definitions for HL. No differences in demographics or disability were noted. HK had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) with anterior approaches than HL but similar EBL with posterior approach. Operative time did not differ between groups. Control, HL, and HK groups differed in BL TS-CL (36.6° vs. 22.5° vs. 60.7°, P < 0.001) and BL-SVA (10.8 vs. 7.0 vs. -47.8 mm, P = 0.001). HL patients had less discectomies, less corpectomies, and similar osteotomy rates to HK. HL had 3x revisions of HK and controls (28.6 vs. 10.0 vs. 9.2%, respectively, P = 0.046). At 1Y, HL patients had higher cSVA and trended higher SVA and SS than HK. In terms of BL-upper cervical alignment, HK patients had higher McGregor's slope (MGS) (16.1° vs. 3.3°, P = 0.002) and C0-C2 Cobb (43.3° vs. 26.9°, P < 0.001), however, postoperative differences in MGS and C0-C2 were not significant. HK drivers of deformity were primarily C (90%), whereas HL had primary CT (38.1%), UT (23.8%), and C (14.3%) drivers. Conclusions: Hyperlodotic patients trended higher revision rates with greater radiographic malalignment at 1-year postoperative, perhaps due to undercorrection compared to kyphotic etiologies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes
    (Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine, 2021-07-01) Alas, Haddy; Passias, Peter Gust; Diebo, Bassel G; Brown, Avery E; Pierce, Katherine E; Bortz, Cole; Lafage, Renaud; Ames, Christopher P; Line, Breton; Klineberg, Eric O; Burton, Douglas C; Uribe, Juan S; Kim, Han Jo; Daniels, Alan H; Bess, Shay; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Mundis, Gregory M; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie
    Introduction: Patients with symptomatic cervical deformity (CD) requiring surgical correction often present with hyperkyphosis (HK), though patients with hyperlordotic curves may require surgery as well. Few studies have investigated differences in CD-corrective surgery with regards to HK and hyperlordosis (HL). Materials and Methods: Operative CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb >10°, cervical lordosis [CL] >10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] >4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle >25°) with baseline (BL) and 1Y radiographic data. Patients were stratified based on BL C2-7 lordosis (CL) angle: those >1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean (-6.96° ±21.47°) were hyperlordotic (>14.51°) or hyperkyphotic (≤28.43°) depending on directionality. Patients within 1 SD were considered the control group. Results: One hundred and two surgical CD pts (61 years, 65%F, 30 kg/m 2) with BL and 1Y radiographic data were included. Twenty pts met definitions for HK and 21 pts met definitions for HL. No differences in demographics or disability were noted. HK had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) with anterior approaches than HL but similar EBL with the posterior approach. Op-time did not differ between groups. Control, HL, and HK groups differed in BL TS-CL (36.6° vs. 22.5° vs. 60.7°, P < 0.001) and BL-sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (10.8 vs. 7.0 vs. -47.8 mm, P = 0.001). HL pts had less discectomies, less corpectomies, and similar osteotomy rates to HK. HL had × 3 revisions of HK and controls (28.6 vs. 10.0 vs. 9.2%, respectively, P = 0.046). At 1Y, HL pts had higher cSVA, and trended higher SVA and SS than HK. In terms of BL-upper cervical alignment, HK pts had higher McGregor's-slope (16.1° vs. -3.3°, P = 0.001) and C0-C2 Cobb (43.3° vs. 26.9°, P < 0.001), however postoperative differences in McGregor's slope and C0-C2 were not significant. HK drivers of deformity were primarily C (90%), whereas HL had primary computed tomography (38.1%), upper thoracic (23.8%), and C (14.3%) drivers. Conclusions: Hyperlodotic patients trended higher revision rates with greater radiographic malalignment at 1Y postoperative, perhaps due to undercorrection compared to kyphotic etiologies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Cervical Versus Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformities: A Comparison of Baseline Quality-of-Life Burden.
    (Clinical spine surgery, 2018-12) Passias, Peter G; Poorman, Gregory W; Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin; Ames, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Shaffrey, Chris; Segreto, Frank A; Horn, Samantha R; Bortz, Cole A; Varlotta, Christopher G; Hockley, Aaron; Wang, Charles; Daniels, Alan; Neuman, Brian; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas; Javidan, Yashar; Line, Breton; LaFage, Renaud; Bess, Shay; Sciubba, Daniel; ISSG

    Study design

    Retrospective analysis of 2 prospectively collected multicenter databases, one for cervical deformity (CD) and the other for general adult spinal deformity.

    Objective

    To investigate the relative quality-of-life and disability burden in patients with uncompensated cervical, thoracolumbar, or cervical and thoracolumbar deformities.

    Summary of background data

    The relative quality-of-life burden of cervical and thoracolumbar deformities have never been compared with each other. This may have significant implications when deciding on the appropriate treatment intervention for patients with combined thoracolumbar and cervical deformities.

    Methods

    When defining CD C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA)>4 cm was used while a C7-S1 SVA>5 cm was used to defined thoracolumbar deformity. Patients with both SVA criteria were defined as "combined." Primary analysis compared patients in the different groups by demographic, comorbidity data, and quality-of-life scores [EuroQOL 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)] using t tests. Secondary analysis matched deformity groups with propensity scores matching based on baseline EQ-5D scores. Differences in disease-specific metrics [the Oswestry Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association questionnaire (mJOA)] were analyzed using analysis of variance tests and post hoc analysis.

    Results

    In total, 212 patients were included in our analysis. Patients with CD only had less neurological deficits (mJOA: 14.6) and better EQ-5D (0.746) scores compared with patients with combined deformities (11.9, 0.716), all P<0.05. Regarding propensity score-matched deformity cohorts, 99 patients were matched with similar quality-of-life burden, 33 per deformity cohort. CD only patients had fewer comorbidities (1.03 vs. 2.12 vs. 2.70; P<0.001), whereas patients with combined deformity had more baseline neurological impairment compared with CD only patients (mJOA: 12.00 vs. 14.25; P=0.050).

    Conclusions

    Combined deformity patients were associated with the lowest quality-of-life and highest disability. Furthermore, regarding deformity cohorts matched by similar baseline quality-of-life status (EQ-5D), patients with combined deformities were associated with significantly worse neurological impairments. This finding implies that quality of life may not be a direct reflection of a patient's disability status, especially in patients with combined cervical and thoracolumbar deformities.

    Level of evidence

    Level III.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Contemporary utilization of three-column osteotomy techniques in a prospective complex spinal deformity multicenter database: implications on full-body alignment and perioperative course.
    (Spine deformity, 2024-06) Williamson, Tyler K; Mir, Jamshaid M; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Demetriades, Andreas K; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence G; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Klineberg, Eric O; Bess, Shay; Passias, Peter G; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    Research has focused on the increased correction from a three-column osteotomy (3CO) during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, an in-depth analysis on the performance of a 3CO in a cohort of complex spinal deformity cases has not been described.

    Study design/setting

    This is a retrospective study on a prospectively enrolled, complex ASD database.

    Purpose

    This study aimed to determine if three-column osteotomies demonstrate superior benefit in correction of complex sagittal deformity at the cost of increased perioperative complications.

    Methods

    Surgical complex adult spinal deformity patients were included and grouped into thoracolumbar 3COs compared to those who did not have a 3CO (No 3CO) (remaining cohort). Rigid deformity was defined as ΔLL less than 33% from standing to supine. Severe deformity was defined as global (SVA > 70 mm) or C7-PL > 70 mm, or lumbopelvic (PI-LL > 30°). Means comparison tests assessed correction by 3CO grade/location. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity evaluated outcomes up to six weeks compared to No 3CO.

    Results

    648 patients were included (Mean age 61 ± 14.6 years, BMI 27.55 ± 5.8 kg/m2, levels fused: 12.6 ± 3.8). 126 underwent 3CO, a 20% higher usage than historical cohorts. 3COs were older, frail, and more likely to undergo revision (OR 5.2, 95% CI [2.6-10.6]; p < .001). 3COs were more likely to present with both severe global/lumbopelvic deformity (OR 4), 62.4% being rigid. 3COs had greater use of secondary rods (OR 4st) and incurred 4 times greater risk for: massive blood loss (> 3500 mL), longer LOS, SICU admission, perioperative wound and spine-related complications, and neurologic complications when performed below L3. 3COs had similar HRQL benefit, but higher perioperative opioid use. Mean segmental correction increased by grade (G3-21; G4-24; G5-27) and was 4 × greater than low-grade osteotomies, especially below L3 (OR 12). 3COs achieved 2 × greater spinopelvic correction. Higher grades properly distributed lordosis 50% of the time except L5. Pelvic compensation and non-response were relieved more often with increasing grade, with greater correction in all lower extremity parameters (p < .01). Due to the increased rate of complications, 3COs trended toward higher perioperative cost ($42,806 vs. $40,046, p = .086).

    Conclusion

    Three-column osteotomy usage in contemporary complex spinal deformities is generally limited to more disabled individuals undergoing the most severe sagittal and coronal realignment procedures. While there is an increased perioperative cost and prolongation of length of stay with usage, these techniques represent the most powerful realignment techniques available with a dramatic impact on normalization at operative levels and reciprocal changes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Cost Benefit of Implementation of Risk Stratification Models for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
    (Global Spine J, 2023-12-11) Passias, Peter G; Williamson, Tyler K; Kummer, Nicholas A; Pellisé, Ferran; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Serra-Burriel, Miguel; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Vira, Shaleen; Gum, Jeffrey L; Haddad, Sleiman; Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Francisco Javier; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Daniels, Alan H; Chou, Dean; Klineberg, Eric O; Gupta, Munish C; Kebaish, Khaled M; Kelly, Michael P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Kleinstück, Frank; Obeid, Ibrahim; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Alanay, Ahmet; Ames, Christopher P; Schwab, Frank J; Hostin, Richard A; Bess, Shay; International Spine Study Group
    STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility. RESULTS: By 2 years, 31% experienced a major complication and 23% underwent reoperation. Patients with ≤2 risk factors had significantly less major complications. Patients with 2 risk factors improved the most from baseline to 2Y in ODI. Average cost increased by $8234 per risk factor (R2 = .981). Cost-per-QALY at 2Y increased by $122,650 per risk factor (R2 = .794). Adjusted generalized linear model demonstrated a significant trend between increasing risk score and increasing cost-utility (r2 = .408, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of defined patient-specific and surgical risk factors, especially those with greater than two, were associated with increased index surgical costs and diminished cost-utility. Efforts to optimize patient physiology and minimize surgical risk would likely reduce healthcare expenditures and improve the overall cost-utility profile for ASD interventions.Level of evidence: III.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Counseling Guidelines for Anticipated Postsurgical Improvements in Pain, Function, Mental Health, and Self-image for Different Types of Adult Spinal Deformity.
    (Spine, 2020-08) Line, Breton; Bess, Shay; Lafage, Virginie; Ames, Christopher; Burton, Douglas; Kim, Han Jo; Gupta, Munish; Hart, Robert; Klineberg, Eric; Kelly, Michael; Kebaish, Khaled; Hostin, Richard; Mundis, Gregory; Schwab, Frank; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; International Spine Study Group
    STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. OBJECTIVE:Quantify postoperative improvements in pain, function, mental health, and self-image for different ASD types. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Medical providers are commonly requested to counsel patients on anticipated improvements in specific health domains including pain, function, and self-image following surgery. ASD is a heterogeneous condition; therefore, health domain improvements may vary according to deformity type. Few studies have quantified outcomes for specific ASD types. METHODS:Surgically treated ASD patients (≥4 levels fused) prospectively enrolled into a multicenter database, minimum 2-year follow-up, were categorized into ASD types according to Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab ASD classification (THORACIC, LUMBAR, DOUBLE, SAGITTAL, MIXED). Demographic, radiographic, operative, and patient reported outcome measures (NRS back and leg pain, SRS-22r, SF-36) data were evaluated. Preoperative and last postoperative values for pain, physical and social function, mental health, and self-image were evaluated, improvements in each domain were quantified, and domain scores compared to generational normative values. Postoperative improvements were also calculated for three age cohorts (<45 yr, 45-65 yr, and >65 yr) within each deformity type. RESULTS:359 of 564 patients eligible for study (mean age 57.9 yr, mean scoliosis 43.4°, mean SVA 63.3 mm, mean 11.7 levels fused) had ≥2 yr follow-up. Domain improvements for the entire ASD population were 45.1% for back pain, 41.3% for leg pain, 27.1% for physical function, 35.9% for social function, 62.0% for self-image, and 22.6% for mental health (P < 0.05). LUMBAR, SAGITTAL, and MIXED had greatest improvements in pain and function, while THORACIC and DOUBLE had greatest improvements in self-image. Self-image was the most impacted preoperative domain and demonstrated the greatest postoperative improvement for all ASD types. CONCLUSION:ASD patients demonstrated quantifiable postoperative improvements in pain, self-image, physical and social function, and mental health; however, improvements differed between ASD types. Further research is needed to understand specific patient expectations for ASD treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Anterior/Posterior Staged vs. Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    (Spine, 2023-07) Passias, Peter G; Ahmad, Waleed; Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Line, Breton; Daniels, Alan; Mir, Jamshaid M; Gupta, Munish; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert; Nunley, Pierce; Hamilton, D Kojo; Hostin, Richard; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Ames, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Bess, Shay; Klineberg, Eric O; International Spine Study Group

    Studydesign

    Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multi-center adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    To compare staged procedures to same-day interventions and identify the optimal time interval between staged surgeries for treatment of ASD.

    Background

    Surgical intervention for ASD is invasive and complex procedure that surgeons often elect to perform on different days (staging). Yet, there remains a paucity of literature on the timing and effects of the interval between stages.

    Methods

    ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data undergoing an anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion to the ilium were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for number of levels fused, number of interbody devices, surgical approaches, number of osteotomies/three-column osteotomy (3CO), frailty, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), revisions, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and UIV to create balanced cohorts of Same-Day and Staged surgical patients. Staged patients were stratified by intervening time-period between surgeries, using quartiles.

    Results

    176 PSM patients were included. Median interval between A/P staged procedures was 3 days. Staged patients had greater operative time and lower ICU stays postop (P<0.05). At 2Y, staged compared to same day showed a greater improvement in T1 slope - cervical lordosis (TS-CL), C2 sacral slope (C2SS), and SRS-Schwab SVA (P<0.05). Staged patients had higher rates of minimal clinically-important difference (MCID) for 1Y SRS-Appearance and 2Y physical component summary (PCS) scores. Assessing different intervals of staging, patients at the 75th percentile interval showed greater improvement in 1Y SRS Pain and Total postop as well as SRS Activity, Pain, Satisfaction, and Total scores (P<0.05) compared to patients in lower quartiles. Compared to the 25th percentile, patients reaching the 50th percentile interval were associated with increased odds of improvement in Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score proportionality (9.3[1.6-53.2], P=0.01).

    Conclusions

    This investigation is among the first to compare multicenter staged and same day surgery anterior/posterior adult spinal deformity patients fused to ilium using propensity-matching. Staged procedures resulted in significant improvement radiographically, reduced ICU admissions, and superior patient reported outcomes compared to same day procedures. An interval of at least three days between staged procedures is associated with superior outcomes in terms of GAP score proportionality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of a Modified Cervical Deformity Frailty Index: A Streamlined Clinical Tool for Preoperative Risk Stratification.
    (Spine, 2019-02) Passias, Peter G; Bortz, Cole A; Segreto, Frank A; Horn, Samantha R; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Kim, Han Jo; Eastlack, Robert; Hamilton, David Kojo; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Hostin, Richard A; Klineberg, Eric O; Burton, Douglas C; Hart, Robert A; Schwab, Frank J; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    Retrospective review.

    Objective

    Develop a simplified frailty index for cervical deformity (CD) patients.

    Summary of background data

    To improve preoperative risk stratification for surgical CD patients, a CD frailty index (CD-FI) incorporating 40 health deficits was developed. While novel, the CD-FI is clinically impractical due to the large number of factors needed for its calculation. To increase clinical utility, a simpler, modified CD-FI (mCD-FI) is necessary.

    Methods

    CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb>10°, CL>10°, cSVA>4 cm, or CBVA>25°) >18 year with preoperative CD-FI component factors. Pearson bivariate correlation assessed relationships between component deficits of the CD-FI and overall CD-FI score. Top deficits contributing to CD-FI score were included in multiple stepwise regression models. Deficits from model with largest R were dichotomized, and the mean score of all deficits calculated, resulting in mCD-FI score from 0 to 1. Patients were stratified by mCD-FI: Not Frail (NF, <0.3), Frail (0.3-0.5), Severely Frail (SF, >0.5). Means comparison tests established correlations between frailty category and clinical outcomes.

    Results

    Included: 121 CD patients (61 ± 11 yr, 60%F). Multiple stepwise regression models identified 15 deficits as responsible for 86% of the variation in CD-FI; these factors were used to construct the mCD-FI. Overall, mean mCD-FI was 0.31 ± 0.14. Breakdown of patients by mCD-FI category: NF: 47.9%, Frail: 46.3%, SF: 5.8%. Compared with NF and Frail, SF patients had the longest inpatient hospital stays (P = 0.042), as well as greater baseline neck pain (P = 0.033), inferior Neck Disability Index scores (P<0.001) and inferior EQ-5D scores (P < 0.001). Frail patients had higher odds of superficial infection (OR:1.1[1.0-1.2]), and SF patients had increased odds of mortality (OR:8.3[1.3-53.9]).

    Conclusion

    Increased frailty, assessed by mCD-FI, correlated with increased length of stay, neck pain, and decreased health-related quality of life. Frail patients were at greater risk for infection, and severely frail patients had greater odds of mortality. This relationship between frailty and clinical outcomes suggests that mCD-FI offers clinical utility as a preoperative risk stratification tool.

    Level of evidence

    3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of a modified frailty index for adult spinal deformities independent of functional changes following surgical correction: a true baseline risk assessment tool.
    (Spine deformity, 2024-02) Passias, Peter G; Pierce, Katherine E; Mir, Jamshaid M; Krol, Oscar; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Line, Breton; Uribe, Juan S; Hostin, Richard; Daniels, Alan; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas; Shaffrey, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Diebo, Bassel G; Ames, Christopher P; Smith, Justin S; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Bess, Shay; Klineberg, Eric O; International Spine Study Group

    Purpose

    To develop a simplified, modified frailty index for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients dependent on objective clinical factors.

    Methods

    ASD patients with baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) follow-up were included. Factors with the largest R2 value derived from multivariate forward stepwise regression were including in the modified ASD-FI (clin-ASD-FI). Factors included in the clin-ASD-FI were regressed against mortality, extended length of hospital stay (LOS, > 8 days), revisions, major complications and weights for the clin-ASD-FI were calculated via Beta/Sullivan. Total clin-ASD-FI score was created with a score from 0 to 1. Linear regression correlated clin-ASD-FI with ASD-FI scores and published cutoffs for the ASD-FI were used to create the new frailty cutoffs: not frail (NF: < 0.11), frail (F: 0.11-0.21) and severely frail (SF: > 0.21). Binary logistic regression assessed odds of complication or reop for frail patients.

    Results

    Five hundred thirty-one ASD patients (59.5 yrs, 79.5% F) were included. The final model had a R2 of 0.681, and significant factors were: < 18.5 or > 30 BMI (weight: 0.0625 out of 1), cardiac disease (0.125), disability employment status (0.3125), diabetes mellitus (0.0625), hypertension (0.0625), osteoporosis (0.125), blood clot (0.1875), and bowel incontinence (0.0625). These factors calculated the score from 0 to 1, with a mean cohort score of 0.13 ± 0.14. Breakdown by clin-ASD-FI score: 51.8% NF, 28.1% F, 20.2% SF. Increasing frailty severity was associated with longer LOS (NF: 7.0, F: 8.3, SF: 9.2 days; P < 0.001). Frailty independently predicted occurrence of any complication (OR: 9.357 [2.20-39.76], P = 0.002) and reop (OR: 2.79 [0.662-11.72], P = 0.162).

    Conclusions

    Utilizing an existing ASD frailty index, we proposed a modified version eliminating the patient-reported components. This index is a true assessment of physiologic status, and represents a superior risk factor assessment compared to other tools for both primary and revision spinal deformity surgery as a result of its immutability with surgery, lack of subjectivity, and ease of use.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of a Novel Cervical Deformity Surgical Invasiveness Index.
    (Spine, 2020-01) Passias, Peter G; Horn, Samantha R; Soroceanu, Alexandra; Oh, Cheongeun; Ailon, Tamir; Neuman, Brian J; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Bortz, Cole A; Segreto, Frank A; Brown, Avery; Alas, Haddy; Pierce, Katherine E; Eastlack, Robert K; Sciubba, Daniel M; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Klineberg, Eric O; Burton, Douglas C; Hart, Robert A; Schwab, Frank J; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group
    STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to develop a novel surgical invasiveness index for cervical deformity (CD) surgery that incorporates CD-specific parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:There has been a surgical invasiveness index for general spine surgery and adult spinal deformity, but a CD index has not been developed. METHODS:CD was defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7 Cobb >10°, cervical lordosis (CL) >10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) >4 cm, chin brow vertical angle >25°. Consensus from experienced spine and neurosurgeons selected weightings for each variable that went into the invasiveness index. Binary logistic regression predicted high operative time (>338 minutes), estimated blood loss (EBL) (>600 mL), or length of stay (LOS) >5 days) based on the median values of operative time, EBL, and LOS. Multivariable regression modeling was utilized to construct a final model incorporating the strongest combination of factors to predict operative time, LOS, and EBL. RESULTS:Eighty-five CD patients were included (61 years, 66% females). The variables in the newly developed CD invasiveness index with their corresponding weightings were: history of previous cervical surgery (3), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (2/level), corpectomy (4/level), levels fused (1/level), implants (1/level), posterior decompression (2/level), Smith-Peterson osteotomy (2/level), three-column osteotomy (8/level), fusion to upper cervical spine (2), absolute change in T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, cSVA, T4-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) from baseline to 1-year. The newly developed CD-specific invasiveness index strongly predicted long LOS (R = 0.310, P < 0.001), high EBL (R = 0.170, P = 0.011), and extended operative time (R = 0.207, P = 0.031). A second analysis used multivariable regression modeling to determine which combination of factors in the newly developed index were the strongest determinants of operative time, LOS, and EBL. The final predictive model included: number of corpectomies, levels fused, decompression, combined approach, and absolute changes in SVA, cSVA, and TK. This model predicted EBL (R = 0.26), operative time (R = 0.12), and LOS (R = 0.13). CONCLUSION:Extended LOS, operative time, and high blood loss were strongly predicted by the newly developed CD invasiveness index, incorporating surgical factors and radiographic parameters clinically relevant for patients undergoing CD corrective surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:4.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of Risk Stratification Predictive Models for Cervical Deformity Surgery.
    (Neurosurgery, 2022-12) Passias, Peter G; Ahmad, Waleed; Oh, Cheongeun; Imbo, Bailey; Naessig, Sara; Pierce, Katherine; Lafage, Virginie; Lafage, Renaud; Hamilton, D Kojo; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Klineberg, Eric O; Gum, Jeffrey; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Line, Breton; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas C; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    As corrective surgery for cervical deformity (CD) increases, so does the rate of complications and reoperations. To minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes, it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification.

    Objective

    To develop a prognostic utility for identification of risk factors that lead to the development of major complications and unplanned reoperations.

    Methods

    CD patients age 18 years or older were stratified into 2 groups based on the postoperative occurrence of a revision and/or major complication. Multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics that were associated with revision or major complication. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs for predictive variables. Models predicting both outcomes were quantified using area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating curve characteristics.

    Results

    A total of 109 patients with CD were included in this study. By 1 year postoperatively, 26 patients experienced a major complication and 17 patients underwent a revision. Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a revision to include upper instrumented vertebrae > C5, lowermost instrumented vertebrae > T7, number of unfused lordotic cervical vertebrae > 1, baseline T1 slope > 25.3°, and number of vertebral levels in maximal kyphosis > 12 (AUC: 0.82). For developing a major complication, a model included a current smoking history, osteoporosis, upper instrumented vertebrae inclination angle < 0° or > 40°, anterior diskectomies > 3, and a posterior Smith Peterson osteotomy (AUC: 0.81).

    Conclusion

    Revisions were predicted using a predominance of radiographic parameters while the occurrence of major complications relied on baseline bone health, radiographic, and surgical characteristics.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of Validated Computer-based Preoperative Predictive Model for Proximal Junction Failure (PJF) or Clinically Significant PJK With 86% Accuracy Based on 510 ASD Patients With 2-year Follow-up.
    (Spine, 2016-11) Scheer, Justin K; Osorio, Joseph A; Smith, Justin S; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Hart, Robert A; Bess, Shay; Line, Breton; Diebo, Bassel G; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Jain, Amit; Ailon, Tamir; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Klineberg, Eric; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group

    Study design

    A retrospective review of large, multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to build a model based on baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical factors that can predict clinically significant proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF).

    Summary of background data

    PJF and PJK are significant complications and it remains unclear what are the specific drivers behind the development of either. There exists no predictive model that could potentially aid in the clinical decision making for adult patients undergoing deformity correction.

    Methods

    Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, ASD, at least four levels fused. Variables included in the model were demographics, primary/revision, use of three-column osteotomy, upper-most instrumented vertebra (UIV)/lower-most instrumented vertebra (LIV) levels and UIV implant type (screw, hooks), number of levels fused, and baseline sagittal radiographs [pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA)]. PJK was defined as an increase from baseline of proximal junctional angle ≥20° with concomitant deterioration of at least one SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade from 6 weeks postop. PJF was defined as requiring revision for PJK. An ensemble of decision trees were constructed using the C5.0 algorithm with five different bootstrapped models, and internally validated via a 70 : 30 data split for training and testing. Accuracy and the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

    Results

    Five hundred ten patients were included, with 357 for model training and 153 as testing targets (PJF: 37, PJK: 102). The overall model accuracy was 86.3% with an AUC of 0.89 indicating a good model fit. The seven strongest (importance ≥0.95) predictors were age, LIV, pre-operative SVA, UIV implant type, UIV, pre-operative PT, and pre-operative PI-LL.

    Conclusion

    A successful model (86% accuracy, 0.89 AUC) was built predicting either PJF or clinically significant PJK. This model can set the groundwork for preop point of care decision making, risk stratification, and need for prophylactic strategies for patients undergoing ASD surgery.

    Level of evidence

    3.