Browsing by Author "Loh, Dionne Hui Fang"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    An Adaptable Framework for Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence: Results from a Systematic Review of 102 Conceptual Frameworks.
    (Journal of general internal medicine, 2021-09) Peh, Kai Qi Elizabeth; Kwan, Yu Heng; Goh, Hendra; Ramchandani, Hasna; Phang, Jie Kie; Lim, Zhui Ying; Loh, Dionne Hui Fang; Østbye, Truls; Blalock, Dan V; Yoon, Sungwon; Bosworth, Hayden Barry; Low, Lian Leng; Thumboo, Julian

    Objective

    To summarize the available conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence based on the World Health Organization (WHO)'s five dimensions of medication adherence via a systematic review, identify the patient groups described in available conceptual models, and present an adaptable conceptual model that describes the factors contributing to medication adherence in the identified patient groups.

    Methods

    We searched PubMed®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® for English language articles published from inception until 31 March 2020. Full-text original publications in English that presented theoretical or conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence were included. Studies that presented statistical models were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data.

    Results

    We identified 102 conceptual models, and classified the factors contributing to medication adherence using the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence, namely patient-related, medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system/healthcare provider-related, and socioeconomic factors. Eight patient groups were identified based on age and disease condition. The most universally addressed factors were patient-related factors. Medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system-related, and socioeconomic factors were represented to various extents depending on the patient group. By systematically examining how the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence were applied differently across the eight different patient groups, we present a conceptual model that can be adapted to summarize the common factors contributing to medication adherence in different patient groups.

    Conclusion

    Our conceptual models can be utilized as a guide for clinicians and researchers in identifying the facilitators and barriers to medication adherence and developing future interventions to improve medication adherence.

    Protocol registration

    PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020181316.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of an Item Bank to Measure Medication Adherence: Systematic Review.
    (Journal of medical Internet research, 2020-10) Kwan, Yu Heng; Oo, Livia Jia Yi; Loh, Dionne Hui Fang; Phang, Jie Kie; Weng, Si Dun; Blalock, Dan V; Chew, Eng Hui; Yap, Kai Zhen; Tan, Corrinne Yong Koon; Yoon, Sungwon; Fong, Warren; Østbye, Truls; Low, Lian Leng; Bosworth, Hayden Barry; Thumboo, Julian

    Background

    Medication adherence is important in managing the progression of chronic diseases. A promising approach to reduce cognitive burden when measuring medication adherence lies in the use of computer-adaptive tests (CATs) or in the development of shorter patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the lack of an item bank currently hampers this progress.

    Objective

    We aim to develop an item bank to measure general medication adherence.

    Methods

    Using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA), articles published before October 2019 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Items from existing PROMs were classified and selected ("binned" and "winnowed") according to standards published by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cooperative Group.

    Results

    A total of 126 unique PROMs were identified from 213 studies in 48 countries. Items from the literature review (47 PROMs with 579 items for which permission has been obtained) underwent binning and winnowing. This resulted in 421 candidate items (77 extent of adherence and 344 reasons for adherence).

    Conclusions

    We developed an item bank for measuring general medication adherence using items from validated PROMs. This will allow researchers to create new PROMs from selected items and provide the foundation to develop CATs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review (Preprint)
    (2020-04-11) Kwan, Yu Heng; Weng, Si Dun; Loh, Dionne Hui Fang; Phang, Jie Kie; Oo, Livia Jia Yi; Blalock, Dan V; Chew, Eng Hui; Yap, Kai Zhen; Tan, Corrinne Yong Koon; Yoon, Sungwon; Fong, Warren; Østbye, Truls; Low, Lian Leng; Bosworth, Hayden Barry; Thumboo, Julian
    BACKGROUND

    Medication adherence is essential for improving the health outcomes of patients. Various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure medication adherence in patients. However, no study has summarized the psychometric properties of these PROMs to guide selection for use in clinical practice or research.

    OBJECTIVE

    This study aims to evaluate the quality of the PROMs used to measure medication adherence.

    METHODS

    This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The PROMs were then evaluated based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

    RESULTS

    A total of 121 unique medication adherence PROMs from 214 studies were identified. <i>Hypotheses testing for construct validity</i> and <i>internal consistency</i> were the most frequently assessed measurement properties. PROMs with at least a <i>moderate</i> level of evidence for ≥5 measurement properties include the Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20, Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology, General Medication Adherence Scale, Hill-Bone Scale, Immunosuppressant Therapy Barrier Scale, Medication Adherence Reasons Scale (MAR-Scale) revised, 5-item Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS-5), 9-item MARS (MARS-9), 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), 8-item MMAS (MMAS-8), Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Adherence Scale, Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy, Test of Adherence to Inhalers, and questionnaire by Voils. The MAR-Scale revised, MMAS-4, and MMAS-8 have been administered electronically.

    CONCLUSIONS

    This study identified 121 PROMs for medication adherence and provided synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of these PROMs. The findings from this study may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting suitable PROMs to assess medication adherence.

  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review.
    (Journal of medical Internet research, 2020-10) Kwan, Yu Heng; Weng, Si Dun; Loh, Dionne Hui Fang; Phang, Jie Kie; Oo, Livia Jia Yi; Blalock, Dan V; Chew, Eng Hui; Yap, Kai Zhen; Tan, Corrinne Yong Koon; Yoon, Sungwon; Fong, Warren; Østbye, Truls; Low, Lian Leng; Bosworth, Hayden Barry; Thumboo, Julian

    Background

    Medication adherence is essential for improving the health outcomes of patients. Various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure medication adherence in patients. However, no study has summarized the psychometric properties of these PROMs to guide selection for use in clinical practice or research.

    Objective

    This study aims to evaluate the quality of the PROMs used to measure medication adherence.

    Methods

    This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The PROMs were then evaluated based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

    Results

    A total of 121 unique medication adherence PROMs from 214 studies were identified. Hypotheses testing for construct validity and internal consistency were the most frequently assessed measurement properties. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 measurement properties include the Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20, Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology, General Medication Adherence Scale, Hill-Bone Scale, Immunosuppressant Therapy Barrier Scale, Medication Adherence Reasons Scale (MAR-Scale) revised, 5-item Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS-5), 9-item MARS (MARS-9), 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), 8-item MMAS (MMAS-8), Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Adherence Scale, Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy, Test of Adherence to Inhalers, and questionnaire by Voils. The MAR-Scale revised, MMAS-4, and MMAS-8 have been administered electronically.

    Conclusions

    This study identified 121 PROMs for medication adherence and provided synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of these PROMs. The findings from this study may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting suitable PROMs to assess medication adherence.