Browsing by Author "Monteiro-Neto, C"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Incidental capture and mortality of sea turtles in the industrial double-rig-bottom trawl fishery in south-eastern Brazil(Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2019-01-01) Tagliolatto, AB; Giffoni, B; Guimarães, S; Godfrey, MH; Monteiro-Neto, C© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Incidental capture by fisheries is one of the principal threats to sea turtles. This study analysed spatial and temporal patterns of sea turtle bycatch, and estimated the direct initial mortality rate of these animals, in the industrial double-rig-bottom trawl fishery in south-eastern Brazil. This is also the first attempt to relate bycatch/at-sea mortality in bottom trawling to stranded turtles found along the adjacent coast. The fishery was monitored from October 2015 to April 2018 through data collected voluntarily by the captains of eight industrial double-rig trawlers. Two hundred and one sea turtles were captured during 9362 tows (43,657.52 trawling hours), resulting in a catch per unit effort (CPUE) of 0.0025 ± 0.0032 turtles h−1 with a standard net of 30.5 m headrope, with no significant difference between the estimated CPUEs for licensed shrimp and demersal fish trawlers. Caretta caretta (52.24%) and Lepidochelys olivacea (38.81%) were the most frequently captured species. According to Generalized Linear Models, C. caretta bycatch was significantly higher during winter, at lower latitudes (−24° to −23°) and higher longitudes (−42° to −40°), while the L. olivacea bycatch was significantly higher at higher latitudes (−23° to −21°). The direct initial mortality rate of sea turtles in the shrimp trawlers was 7.65 ± 3.85%. However, none of the dead individuals subsequently released with plastic tags (n = 10) were found stranded on the coast. Mortality was not significantly related to the depth or duration of the trawling. The results of this study suggest the need for improvements to the current management of the bottom trawl fishery in Brazil, moving from a species-based to a spatial and seasonal-based approach. There is also a need to develop turtle excluder devices adapted to local fishing conditions.Item Open Access Spatio-temporal distribution of sea turtle strandings and factors contributing to their mortality in south-eastern Brazil(Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2019-01-01) Tagliolatto, AB; Goldberg, DW; Godfrey, MH; Monteiro-Neto, C© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Data on stranded sea turtles were examined between 2010 and 2016 along the northern region of Rio de Janeiro state and between 2016 and 2017 in the southern region, looking for spatio-temporal patterns and determining which factors contributed to their mortality. A total of 12,162 strandings of all five species that occur in Brazil were recorded, with Chelonia mydas being the most common (89.9%). Sea turtles use the Rio de Janeiro coast as a feeding and/or migration area. The intense upwelling (October to April) may be an important factor for the sea turtles feeding in this region, mainly for Eretmochelys imbricata and Dermochelys coriacea, which had a higher number of strandings during this period. Areas further north of the study area include an important nesting site for Caretta caretta in Brazil, which explains the higher concentration of strandings of subadults/adults of this species in this region and during its nesting season. Many anthropogenic threats to sea turtles were documented, mainly incidental capture in fisheries and marine debris, indicating possible hotspots for these threats in the regions of Sepetiba and Guanabara Bays, Cabo Frio, and São Francisco de Itabapoana. Among the natural causes of strandings, the primary factors were chronic illness, endoparasites, and fibropapillomatosis. However, pollution may also be an indirect threat, which negatively affects these animals through reduced health and immunosuppression, leaving them more susceptible to opportunistic diseases. These data are valuable for directing and implementing specific and local mitigation measures along the Rio de Janeiro state coast, such as avoiding bycatch hotspots through fleet communication programmes and/or area and seasonal closures, enforceable legislation, effective penalties and proper waste management.