Browsing by Author "Mosca, Paul J"
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers (Preprint)Adair, Kathryn C; Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G; Masoud, Sabran; Mosca, Paul J; Sexton, J BryanBACKGROUNDEmotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed.
OBJECTIVEThis randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter–writing intervention for improving health care workers’ well-being.
METHODSA total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter–writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples <i>t</i> tests, independent <i>t</i> tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being.
RESULTSParticipants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (<i>P</i><.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (<i>P</i>=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (<i>P</i><.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (<i>P</i>=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (<i>P</i>=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (<i>P</i>=.06) and positive emotion words (<i>P</i>=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (<i>P</i>s>.05).
CONCLUSIONSThis single-exposure gratitude letter–writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers.
Item Open Access Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers.(Journal of medical Internet research, 2020-05-14) Adair, Kathryn C; Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G; Masoud, Sabran; Mosca, Paul J; Sexton, J BryanBACKGROUND:Emotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed. OBJECTIVE:This randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter-writing intervention for improving health care workers' well-being. METHODS:A total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter-writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples t tests, independent t tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being. RESULTS:Participants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (P<.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (P=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (P<.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (P=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (P=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (P=.06) and positive emotion words (P=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (Ps>.05). CONCLUSIONS:This single-exposure gratitude letter-writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers.Item Open Access The Improvement Readiness scale of the SCORE survey: a metric to assess capacity for quality improvement in healthcare.(BMC health services research, 2018-12-17) Adair, Kathryn C; Quow, Krystina; Frankel, Allan; Mosca, Paul J; Profit, Jochen; Hadley, Allison; Leonard, Michael; Bryan Sexton, JBACKGROUND:Quality improvement efforts are inextricably linked to the readiness of healthcare workers to take them on. The current study aims to clarify the nature and measurement of Improvement Readiness (IR) by 1) examining the psychometric properties of a novel IR scale, 2) assessing relationships between IR and other safety culture domains 3) exploring whether IR differs by healthcare worker demographic factors, and 4) examining linguistic differences in word type use between high and low scoring IR work settings from their free text responses. METHODS:Of 13,040 eligible healthcare workers across a large academic health system, 10,627 (response rate 81%) completed the 5-item IR scale, demographics, safety culture scales, and two open-ended questions. Psychometric analyses, correlations and ANOVAs tested the properties of IR. Linguistic Inquiry Word Count software assessed comments from open-ended questions. RESULTS:The IR scale exhibited strong psychometric properties and a one factor model fit the data well (Cronbach's alpha = .93; RMSEA = .07; CFI = 99; TLI = .99). IR scores differed significantly by role, shift, shift length, and years in specialty. IR correlated significantly and in expected directions with safety culture scales. Linguistic analyses revealed that people in low versus high IR work settings used significantly more words in their responses, and specifically more past tense verbs (e.g., "ignored"), negative emotion words (e.g., "upset"), and first person singular ("I"). Workers from high IR work settings used significantly more positive emotions words (e.g., "grateful") and social words (e.g., "team"). CONCLUSION:The IR scale exhibits strong psychometric properties, is associated with better safety and teamwork climate, lower burnout, and predicts linguistic differences in high versus low IR groups.