Browsing by Author "Nguyen, Stacie"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery?
    (World neurosurgery, 2016-02) Park, Paul; Okonkwo, David O; Nguyen, Stacie; Mundis, Gregory M; Than, Khoi D; Deviren, Vedat; La Marca, Frank; Fu, Kai-Ming; Wang, Michael Y; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard; Nunley, Pierce D; Chou, Dean; Kanter, Adam S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Passias, Peter G; Eastlack, Robert K; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    Older age has been considered a relative contraindication to complex spinal procedures. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques to treat patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) have emerged with the potential benefit of decreased approach-related morbidity.

    Objective

    To determine whether a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) could be achieved in patients ages ≥ 65 years with ASD who underwent MIS.

    Methods

    Multicenter database of patients who underwent MIS for ASD was queried. Outcome metrics assessed were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. On the basis of published reports, MCID was defined as a positive change of 12.8 ODI, 1.2 VAS back pain, and 1.6 VAS leg pain.

    Results

    Forty-two patients were identified. Mean age was 70.3 years; 31 (73.8%) were women. Preoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis were 35°, 24.6°, 14.2°, and 4.7 cm, respectively. Postoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were 18°, 25.4°, 11.9°, and 4.9 cm, respectively. A mean of 5.0 levels was treated posteriorly, and a mean of 4.0 interbody fusions was performed. Mean ODI improved from 47.1 to 25.1. Mean VAS back and leg pain scores improved from 6.8 and 5.9 to 2.7 and 2.7, respectively. Mean follow-up was 32.1 months. For ODI, 64.3% of patients achieved MCID. For VAS back and leg pain, 82.9% and 72.2%, respectively, reached MCID.

    Conclusions

    MCID represents the threshold at which patients feel a meaningful clinical improvement has occurred. Our study results suggest that the majority of elderly patients with modest ASD can achieve MCID with MIS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2016-07) Than, Khoi D; Park, Paul; Fu, Kai-Ming; Nguyen, Stacie; Wang, Michael Y; Chou, Dean; Nunley, Pierce D; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Deviren, Vedat; Uribe, Juan S; La Marca, Frank; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Mundis, Gregory M; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study Group
    OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are increasingly used to treat adult spinal deformity. However, standard minimally invasive spinal deformity techniques have a more limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) than traditional open surgery. This study sought to compare "best" versus "worst" outcomes of MIS to identify variables that may predispose patients to postoperative success. METHODS A retrospective review of minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery cases was performed to identify parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores versus those in the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI scores at 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, and the top 20% of patients in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (best group, 22 patients) were compared with the bottom 20% (worst group, 21 patients). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, pre- and postoperative Cobb angles, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, levels fused, operating room time, and blood loss between the best and worst groups. However, the mean preoperative ODI score was significantly higher (worse disability) at baseline in the group that had the greatest improvement in ODI score (58.2 vs 39.7, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative PI-LL mismatch (12.8° best vs 19.5° worst, p = 0.298). The best group had significantly less postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 3.4 vs 6.9 cm, p = 0.043) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (10.4° vs 19.4°, p = 0.027) than the worst group. The best group also had better postoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend that spinal deformity surgeons using MIS techniques focus on correcting a patient's PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA to < 5 cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will attain the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while the spines of patients who do the worst are not appropriately corrected and may be fused into a fixed sagittal plane deformity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    (World neurosurgery, 2016-03) Park, Paul; Wang, Michael Y; Nguyen, Stacie; Mundis, Gregory M; La Marca, Frank; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Okonkwo, David O; Kanter, Adam S; Fessler, Richard; Eastlack, Robert K; Chou, Dean; Deviren, Vedat; Nunley, Pierce D; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study Group

    Objective

    Obesity can be associated with increased complications and potentially worse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of obesity on complications and outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

    Methods

    A multicenter database of patients with ASD treated via MIS was queried. Of 190 patients in the database, 77 fit the inclusion criteria of 3 or more spinal levels treated minimally invasively. Patients were divided by body mass index (BMI) <30 (nonobese; n = 59) and BMI ≥ 30 (obese; n = 18).

    Results

    Mean BMI was 24.6 nonobese and 35.0 obese (P < 0.001). There were mean 3.8 interbody fusions nonobese and 4.7 obese (P = 0.065). Levels treated posteriorly averaged 5.8 nonobese and 5.9 obese (P = 0.502). Mean follow-up was 34.4 months nonobese and 35.3 months obese (P = 0.976). Baseline radiographic parameters were similar between groups. Postoperatively, SVA averaged 83.9 mm obese and 20.4 mm nonobese (P = 0.002). Postoperative lumbar lordosis-pelvic incidence mismatch averaged 17.9° obese and 9.9° nonobese (P = 0.028). Both groups had improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores with no difference in postoperative ODI scores between groups (P = 0.090). Similarly, both groups had decreased VAS scores for back and leg pain with no difference between groups postoperatively. Twenty (33.9%) nonobese patients versus 7 (38.9%) obese patients had complications (P = 0.452).

    Conclusions

    Our results suggest that obesity does not negatively impact complication rate or clinical outcomes in patients with ASD treated via MIS approaches.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2015-04) Park, Paul; Wang, Michael Y; Lafage, Virginie; Nguyen, Stacie; Ziewacz, John; Okonkwo, David O; Uribe, Juan S; Eastlack, Robert K; Anand, Neel; Haque, Raqeeb; Fessler, Richard G; Kanter, Adam S; Deviren, Vedat; La Marca, Frank; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Mundis, Gregory M; Mummaneni, Praveen V; International Spine Study Group

    Object

    Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are becoming a more common means of treating adult spinal deformity (ASD). The aim of this study was to compare the hybrid (HYB) surgical approach, involving minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion with open posterior instrumented fusion, to the circumferential MIS (cMIS) approach to treat ASD.

    Methods

    The authors performed a retrospective, multicenter study utilizing data collected in 105 patients with ASD who were treated via MIS techniques. Criteria for inclusion were age older than 45 years, coronal Cobb angle greater than 20°, and a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: HYB (n = 62) and cMIS (n = 43).

    Results

    The mean age was 60.7 years in the HYB group and 61.0 years in the cMIS group (p = 0.910). A mean of 3.6 interbody fusions were performed in the HYB group compared with a mean of 4.0 interbody fusions in the cMIS group (p = 0.086). Posterior fusion involved a mean of 6.9 levels in the HYB group and a mean of 5.1 levels in the cMIS group (p = 0.003). The mean follow-up was 31.3 months for the HYB group and 38.3 months for the cMIS group. The mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score improved by 30.6 and 25.7, and the mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back/leg pain improved by 2.4/2.5 and 3.8/4.2 for the HYB and cMIS groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups with regard to ODI or VAS scores. For the HYB group, the lumbar coronal Cobb angle decreased by 13.5°, lumbar lordosis (LL) increased by 8.2°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) decreased by 2.2 mm, and LL-pelvic incidence (LL-PI) mismatch decreased by 8.6°. For the cMIS group, the lumbar coronal Cobb angle decreased by 10.3°, LL improved by 3.0°, SVA increased by 2.1 mm, and LL-PI decreased by 2.2°. There were no significant differences in these radiographic parameters between groups. The complication rate, however, was higher in the HYB group (55%) than in the cMIS group (33%) (p = 0.024).

    Conclusions

    Both HYB and cMIS approaches resulted in clinical improvement, as evidenced by decreased ODI and VAS pain scores. While there was no significant difference in degree of radiographic correction between groups, the HYB group had greater absolute improvement in degree of lumbar coronal Cobb angle correction, increased LL, decreased SVA, and decreased LL-PI. The complication rate, however, was higher with the HYB approach than with the cMIS approach.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Does Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Reduce Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis.
    (Neurosurgery, 2016-01) Mummaneni, Praveen V; Park, Paul; Fu, Kai-Ming; Wang, Michael Y; Nguyen, Stacie; Lafage, Virginie; Uribe, Juan S; Ziewacz, John; Terran, Jamie; Okonkwo, David O; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard; Kanter, Adam S; LaMarca, Frank; Deviren, Vedat; Bess, R Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Smith, Justin S; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Mundis, Gregory M; Shaffrey, Christopher I; International Spine Study Group

    Background

    Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a known complication after spinal deformity surgery. One potential cause is disruption of posterior muscular tension band during pedicle screw placement.

    Objective

    To investigate the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on PJK.

    Methods

    A multicenter database of patients who underwent deformity surgery was propensity matched for pelvic incidence (PI) to lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch and change in LL. Radiographic PJK was defined as proximal junctional angle >10°. Sixty-eight patients made up the circumferential MIS (cMIS) group, and 68 were in the hybrid (HYB) surgery group (open screw placement).

    Results

    Preoperatively, there was no difference in age, body mass index, PI-LL mismatch, or sagittal vertical axis. The mean number of levels treated posteriorly was 4.7 for cMIS and 8.2 for HYB (P < .001). Both had improved LL and PI-LL mismatch postoperatively. Sagittal vertical axis remained physiological for the cMIS and HYB groups. Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved in both groups. Radiographic PJK developed in 31.3% of the cMIS and 52.9% of the HYB group (P = .01). Reoperation for PJK was 4.5% for the cMIS and 10.3% for the HYB group (P = .20). Subgroup analysis for patients undergoing similar levels of posterior instrumentation in the cMIS and HYB groups found a PJK rate of 48.1% and 53.8% (P = .68) and a reoperation rate of 11.1% and 19.2%, respectively (P = .41). Mean follow-up was 32.8 months.

    Conclusion

    Overall rates of radiographic PJK and reoperation for PJK were not significantly decreased with MIS pedicle screw placement. However, a larger comparative study is needed to confirm that MIS pedicle screw placement does not affect PJK.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Minimally Invasive Surgery for Mild-to-Moderate Adult Spinal Deformities: Impact on Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Stay.
    (World neurosurgery, 2019-07) Chou, Dean; Mundis, Gregory; Wang, Michael; Fu, Kai-Ming; Shaffrey, Christopher; Okonkwo, David; Kanter, Adam; Eastlack, Robert; Nguyen, Stacie; Deviren, Vedat; Uribe, Juan; Fessler, Richard; Nunley, Pierce; Anand, Neel; Park, Paul; Mummaneni, Praveen; International Spine Study Group

    Objective

    To compare circumferential minimally invasive (cMIS) versus open surgeries for mild-to-moderate adult spinal deformity (ASD) with regard to intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOS).

    Methods

    A retrospective review of 2 multicenter ASD databases with 426 ASD (sagittal vertical axis <6 cm) surgery patients with 4 or more fusion levels and 2-year follow-up was conducted. ICU stay, LOS, and estimated blood loss (EBL) were compared between open and cMIS surgeries.

    Results

    Propensity matching resulted in 88 patients (44 cMIS, 44 open). cMIS were older (61 vs. 53 years, P = 0.005). Mean levels fused were 6.5 in cMIS and 7.1 in open (P = 0.368). Preoperative lordosis was higher in open than in cMIS (42.7° vs. 40.9°, P = 0.016), and preoperative visual analog score back pain was greater in open than in cMIS (7 vs. 6.2, P = 0.033). Preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and coronal Cobb angles were not different. EBL was 534 cc in cMIS and 1211 cc in open (P < 0.001). Transfusions were less in cMIS (27.3% vs. 70.5%, P < 0.001). ICU stay was 0.6 days for cMIS and 1.2 days for open (P = 0.009). Hospital LOS was 7.9 days for cMIS versus 9.6 for open (P = 0.804).

    Conclusions

    For patients with mild-to-moderate ASD, cMIS surgery had a significantly lower EBL and shorter ICU stay. Major and minor complication rates were lower in cMIS patients than open patients. Overall LOS was shorter in cMIS patients, but did not reach statistical significance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Postoperative Recovery After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Comparative Analysis of Age in 149 Patients During 2-year Follow-up.
    (Spine, 2015-10) Scheer, Justin K; Mundis, Gregory M; Klineberg, Eric; Hart, Robert A; Deviren, Vedat; Nguyen, Stacie; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Gupta, Munish; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Ames, Christopher P; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Study design

    Retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    We hypothesized that increased age and increased preoperative disability would negatively impact both the length of time needed to achieve maximal recovery and the amount of functional improvement achieved. In order to gauge the recovery process, a normalization process was used to calculate an integrated health state (IHS) during the 2-year postoperative period.

    Summary of background data

    Elderly patients with ASD generally have worse baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures than younger patients. Current methods of reporting outcomes are limited, perhaps diminishing the health impact of the entire postoperative recovery experience.

    Methods

    Inclusion criteria included 18 or more years and ASD. Patient groups: young (≤45 yr), middle (46-64), elderly (≥65) as well as by baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores: MILD (0-30), MEDIUM (31-49), and HIGH (≥50). Collected HRQOL measures included ODI, Short Form-36(PCS/MCS), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS22) at baseline, 6 weeks, 1, and 2-year postoperative. All HRQOL measures were normalized to each patient's baseline scores. A 2-year IHS was calculated for each individual patient and the means were compared between groups.

    Results

    149 patients were included (≤45:32, 46-64:67, ≥65:50). All groups significantly improved in all HRQOL at 2-year compared with baseline (P < 0.05) except for MCS, ODI, and SRS activity for the 45 or less group (P > 0.05). Normalized IHS HRQOL for young patients was worse than elderly for ODI, PCS, MCS, SRS activity, pain and total during the 2-year recovery period from index surgery. The MILD ODI group had significantly worse 2-year IHS values than the HIGH group for all HRQOL measured (P < 0.05) except SRS appearance and satisfaction (P > 0.05).

    Conclusion

    Contrary to our hypothesis, an IHS analysis suggested that the recovery process was significantly better for elderly patients than young patients and better for patients with high baseline disability.

    Level of evidence

    3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Re-operation After Long-Segment Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity: The Impact of Extending the Construct Below the Lumbar Spine.
    (Neurosurgery, 2018-02) Witiw, Christopher D; Fessler, Richard G; Nguyen, Stacie; Mummaneni, Praveen; Anand, Neel; Blaskiewicz, Donald; Uribe, Juan; Wang, Michael Y; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David; Park, Paul; Deviren, Vedat; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Eastlack, Robert K; Shaffrey, Christopher; Mundis, Gregory M

    Background

    Deciding where to end a long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) may be a challenge, particularly in the absence of an abnormality at L5/S1. Some suggest prophylactic extension of the construct to the sacrum and/or ilium (S/I) to protect against distal junctional failure, while others support terminating in the lower lumbar spine to preserve motion.

    Objective

    To compare the risk of re-operation after long-segment fusions for ASD that ends at L4 or L5 (L4/5) vs S/I.

    Methods

    A multicenter database of patients treated for ASD by circumferential minimally invasive surgery or hybrid surgical technique was screened for individuals with long fusions (≥4 vertebral levels) ending at L4 or below and with at least 2 yr of follow-up. Multivariate regression modeling was used to compare surgical morbidity between the L4/5 and S/I groups, and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to compare risk of re-operation.

    Results

    There were 45 subjects with fusion to L4/5 and 71 to S/I. Over a 32-mo median follow-up, 41 re-operations were performed; 6 were for distal junctional failure. In those with normal or mild degeneration at L5/S1, fusion to S/I afforded no significant change in re-operative risk (hazard ratio = 1.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.53-2.62], P = .682). In those undergoing circumferential minimally invasive surgery correction, fusion to S/I was associated with significantly greater blood loss (499.6 cc, P < .001) and surgical time (97.5 min, P = .04).

    Conclusion

    In the setting of a normal or mildly degenerated L5/S1 disc space, fusion to the sacrum/ilium did not significantly change the risk of requiring a re-operation after a long-segment fusion for ASD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.
    (European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016-08) Hamilton, D Kojo; Kanter, Adam S; Bolinger, Bryan D; Mundis, Gregory M; Nguyen, Stacie; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Anand, Neel; Fessler, Richard G; Passias, Peter G; Park, Paul; La Marca, Frank; Uribe, Juan S; Wang, Michael Y; Akbarnia, Behrooz A; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Okonkwo, David O; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

    Introduction

    Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are gaining popularity in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD). The premise is that MIS techniques will lead to equivalent outcomes and a reduction in perioperative complications when compared with open techniques. Potential issues with MIS techniques are a limited capacity to correct lumbar lordosis, unknown long-term efficacy, and the potential need for revision surgery. This study compares reoperation rates and reasons for reoperation following MIS, hybrid, and open surgery for ASD through multicenter database analysis.

    Methods

    We retrospectively analyzed a prospective multicenter ASD database comparing open and MIS correction techniques. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years with minimum 20° coronal lumbar Cobb angle, a minimum of three levels fused, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were propensity matched for preoperative sagittal vertebral axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and number of levels fused. We included 189 patients from three propensity-matched subgroups of 63 patients each: (1) MIS: lateral or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) and percutaneous pedicle instrumentation, (2) Hybrid: MIS LIF with open posterior segmental fixation (PSF), and (3) OPEN: open posterior fixation ± osteotomies.

    Results

    With propensity matching, there were significant differences between groups in pre-op SVA or PI-LL (p > 0.05). The MIS group had significantly fewer levels fused (5.4) (0-14) than the OPEN group (7.4) (p = 0.002) (0-17). The rate of revision surgery was significantly different between the groups with a higher rate of revision (27 %) amongst the HYB group versus MIS = 11.1 %, and OPEN = 12.0 %. The most common reason for reoperation in the OPEN and HYB groups was a postoperative neurological deficit (7.9 and 11.1 %), respectively. The most common reason for reoperation in the MIS group was pseudoarthrosis (7.9 %).

    Conclusions

    Reoperation rates were not statistically different among the MIS, and OPEN surgical groups, but differed significantly on multivariate analysis with HYB group. The incidence of reoperations was twice as high in the Hybrid group compared to OPEN and MIS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2017-02) Theologis, Alexander A; Mundis, Gregory M; Nguyen, Stacie; Okonkwo, David O; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Fessler, Richard; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank; Diebo, Bassel G; Burton, Douglas; Hart, Robert; Deviren, Vedat; Ames, Christopher;  for the International Spine Study Group
    OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of supplementing long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion (posterior spinal fusion, PSF) with lateral interbody fusion (LIF) of the lumbar/thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Two multicenter databases were evaluated. Adults who had undergone multilevel LIF of the coronal curve apex in addition to PSF with L5-S1 interbody fusion (LS+Apex group) were matched by number of posterior levels fused with patients who had undergone PSF with L5-S1 interbody fusion without LIF (LS-Only group). All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. Percutaneous PSF and 3-column osteotomy (3CO) were excluded. Demographics, perioperative details, radiographic spinal deformity measurements, and HRQoL data were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were matched (LS+Apex: 16; LS: 16) (6 men, 26 women; mean age 63 ± 10 years). Overall, the average values for measures of deformity were as follows: Cobb angle > 40°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 6 cm, pelvic tilt (PT) > 25°, and mismatch between pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) > 15°. There were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative radiographic parameters, although patients in the LS+Apex group had greater Cobb angles and less LL. Patients in the LS+Apex group had significantly more anterior levels fused (4.6 vs 1), longer operative times (859 vs 379 minutes), and longer length of stay (12 vs 7.5 days) (all p < 0.01). For patients in the LS+Apex group, Cobb angle, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL (lumbopelvic mismatch), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain improved significantly (p < 0.05). For patients in the LS-Only group, there were significant improvements in Cobb angle, ODI score, and VAS scores for back and leg pain. The LS+Apex group had better correction of Cobb angles (56% vs 33%, p = 0.02), SVA (43% vs 5%, p = 0.46), LL (62% vs 13%, p = 0.35), and PI-LL (68% vs 33%, p = 0.32). Despite more LS+Apex patients having major complications (56% vs 13%; p = 0.02) and postoperative leg weakness (31% vs 6%, p = 0.07), there were no intergroup differences in 2-year outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Long open posterior instrumented fusion with or without multilevel LIF is used to treat a variety of coronal and sagittal adult thoracolumbar deformities. The addition of multilevel LIF to open PSF with L5-S1 interbody support in this small cohort was often used in more severe coronal and/or lumbopelvic sagittal deformities and offered better correction of major Cobb angles, lumbopelvic parameters, and SVA than posterior-only operations. As these advantages came at the expense of more major complications, more leg weakness, greater blood loss, and longer operative times and hospital stays without an improvement in 2-year outcomes, future investigations should aim to more clearly define deformities that warrant the addition of multilevel LIF to open PSF and L5-S1 interbody fusion.