Browsing by Author "Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Advancing Prone-Transpsoas Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review and Evolution of Indications with Representative Cases.
    (Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-02) Drossopoulos, Peter N; Bardeesi, Anas; Wang, Timothy Y; Huang, Chuan-Ching; Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C; Than, Khoi D; Crutcher, Clifford; Pokorny, Gabriel; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Pollina, John; Taylor, William; Bhowmick, Deb A; Pimenta, Luiz; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M
    The Prone Transpsoas (PTP) approach to lumbar spine surgery, emerging as an evolution of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), offers significant advantages over traditional methods. PTP has demonstrated increased lumbar lordosis gains compared to LLIF, owing to the natural increase in lordosis afforded by prone positioning. Additionally, the prone position offers anatomical advantages, with shifts in the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus, reducing the likelihood of postoperative femoral plexopathy and moving critical peritoneal contents away from the approach. Furthermore, operative efficiency is a notable benefit of PTP. By eliminating the need for intraoperative position changes, PTP reduces surgical time, which in turn decreases the risk of complications and operative costs. Finally, its versatility extends to various lumbar pathologies, including degeneration, adjacent segment disease, and deformities. The growing body of evidence indicates that PTP is at least as safe as traditional approaches, with a potentially better complication profile. In this narrative review, we review the historical evolution of lateral interbody fusion, culminating in the prone transpsoas approach. We also describe several adjuncts of PTP, including robotics and radiation-reduction methods. Finally, we illustrate the versatility of PTP and its uses, ranging from 'simple' degenerative cases to complex deformity surgeries.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemUnknown
    Evolution of the Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): From Open to Percutaneous to Patient-Specific.
    (Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-04) Drossopoulos, Peter N; Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C; Tabarestani, Troy Q; Huang, Chuan-Ching; Paturu, Mounica; Bardeesi, Anas; Ray, Wilson Z; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Goodwin, C Rory; Erickson, Melissa; Chi, John H; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M
    The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has seen significant evolution since its early inception, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques, patient safety, and outcomes. Originally described as an improvement over the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), the TLIF began as an open surgical procedure, that notably reduced the need for the extensive neural retractation that hindered the PLIF. In line with the broader practice of surgery, trending toward minimally invasive access, the TLIF was followed by the development of the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), a technique that further decreased tissue trauma and postoperative complications. Subsequent advancements, including Trans-Kambin's Triangle TLIF (percLIF) and transfacet LIF, have continued to refine surgical access, minimize surgical footprint, and reduce the risk of injury to the patient. The latest evolution, as we will describe it, the patient-specific TLIF, is a culmination of the aforementioned adaptations and incorporates advanced imaging and segmentation technologies into perioperative planning, allowing surgeons to tailor approaches based on individual patient anatomy and pathology. These developments signify a shift towards more precise methods in spine surgery. The ongoing evolution of the TLIF technique illustrates the dynamic nature of surgery and emphasizes the need for continued adaptation and refinement.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemUnknown
    Pushing the Limits of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery-From Preoperative to Intraoperative to Postoperative Management.
    (Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-04) Drossopoulos, Peter N; Sharma, Arnav; Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C; Tabarestani, Troy Q; Bartlett, Alyssa M; Wang, Timothy Y; Huie, David; Gottfried, Oren; Blitz, Jeanna; Erickson, Melissa; Lad, Shivanand P; Bullock, W Michael; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M
    The introduction of minimally invasive surgery ushered in a new era of spine surgery by minimizing the undue iatrogenic injury, recovery time, and blood loss, among other complications, of traditional open procedures. Over time, technological advancements have further refined the care of the operative minimally invasive spine patient. Moreover, pre-, and postoperative care have also undergone significant change by way of artificial intelligence risk stratification, advanced imaging for surgical planning and patient selection, postoperative recovery pathways, and digital health solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges persist necessitating ongoing research and collaboration to further optimize patient care in minimally invasive spine surgery.