Browsing by Author "Pagano, Livio"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access 9th Trends in Medical Mycology Held on 11–14 October 2019, Nice, France, Organized under the Auspices of EORTC-IDG and ECMM(Journal of Fungi) Gangneux, Jean-Pierre; Lortholary, Olivier; Cornely, Oliver; Pagano, LivioDear Friends and Colleagues,It is a great honor and pleasure for us to invite you cordially to participate in the 9th Congress on Trends in Medical Mycology (TIMM-9) [...]Item Open Access Clinical characteristics and outcomes of invasive Lomentospora prolificans infections: Analysis of patients in the FungiScope® registry.(Mycoses, 2020-05) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Seidel, Danila; Cornely, Oliver A; Chen, Sharon; van Hal, Sebastiaan; Kauffman, Carol; Miceli, Marisa H; Heinemann, Melina; Christner, Martin; Jover Sáenz, Alfredo; Burchardt, Alexander; Kemmerling, Björn; Herbrecht, Raoul; Steinmann, Joerg; Shoham, Shmuel; Gräber, Sandra; Pagano, Livio; Deeren, Dries; Slavin, Monica A; Hoenigl, MartinOBJECTIVES:Invasive fungal infections caused by Lomentospora prolificans are associated with very high mortality rates and can be challenging to treat given pan-drug resistance to available antifungal agents. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes in a cohort of patients with invasive L prolificans infections. METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with invasive L prolificans infection in the FungiScope® registry of rare invasive fungal infections. Patients diagnosed between 01 January 2008 and 09 September 2019 were included in for analysis. RESULTS:The analysis included 41 patients with invasive L prolificans infection from eight different countries. Haematological/oncological malignancies were the most frequent underlying disease (66%), disseminated infection was frequent (61%), and the lung was the most commonly involved organ (44%). Most infections (59%) were breakthrough infections. Progression/deterioration/treatment failure was observed in 23/40 (58%) of patients receiving antifungal therapy. In total, 21/41 (51%) patients, and 77% of patients with underlying haematological/oncological malignancy, had a fatal outcome attributed to invasive fungal infection. Combination antifungal therapy was frequent (24/40) and associated with improved survival. In particular, treatment regimens including terbinafine were significantly associated with higher treatment success at final assessment (P = .012), with a positive trend observed for treatment regimens that included voriconazole (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS:Lomentospora prolificans infections were associated with mortality rates of 77% and above in patients with underlying haematological/oncological malignancies and those with disseminated infections. While combination therapy is the preferred option for now, the hope lies with novel antifungals currently under development.Item Open Access Do high MICs predict the outcome in invasive fusariosis?(The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021-03) Nucci, Marcio; Jenks, Jeffrey; Thompson, George R; Hoenigl, Martin; Dos Santos, Marielle Camargo; Forghieri, Fabio; Rico, Juan Carlos; Bonuomo, Valentina; López-Soria, Leyre; Lass-Flörl, Cornelia; Candoni, Anna; Garcia-Vidal, Carolina; Cattaneo, Chiara; Buil, Jochem; Rabagliati, Ricardo; Roiz, Maria Pia; Gudiol, Carlota; Fracchiolla, Nicola; Campos-Herrero, Maria Isolina; Delia, Mario; Farina, Francesca; Fortun, Jesus; Nadali, Gianpaolo; Sastre, Enric; Colombo, Arnaldo L; Pérez Nadales, Elena; Alastruey-Izquierdo, Ana; Pagano, LivioBackground
Invasive fusariosis (IF) affects mostly severely immunocompromised hosts and is associated with poor outcome. Since Fusarium species exhibit high MICs for most antifungal agents, this could explain the poor prognosis. However, a clear-cut correlation between MIC and outcome has not been established.Objective
To evaluate the correlation between MIC and outcome (6 week death rate) in patients with IF.Methods
We performed a multicentre retrospective study of patients with IF who received treatment and had MIC levels determined by EUCAST or CLSI for the drug(s) used during treatment. We compared the MIC50 and MIC distribution among survivors and patients who died within 6 weeks from the diagnosis of IF.Results
Among 88 patients with IF, 74 had haematological diseases. Primary treatment was monotherapy in 52 patients (voriconazole in 27) and combination therapy in 36 patients (liposomal amphotericin B + voriconazole in 23). The MIC50 and range for the five most frequent agents tested were: voriconazole 8 mg/L (range 0.5-64), amphotericin B 2 mg/L (range 0.25-64), posaconazole 16 mg/L (range 0.5-64), itraconazole 32 mg/L (range 4-64), and isavuconazole 32 mg/L (range 8-64). There was no difference in MIC50 and MIC distribution among survivors and patients who died. By contrast, persistent neutropenia and receipt of corticosteroids were strong predictors of 6 week mortality.Conclusions
Our study did not show any correlation between MIC and mortality at 6 weeks in patients with IF.Item Open Access Immune Parameters for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring in Invasive Mold Infection.(Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Rawlings, Stephen A; Garcia-Vidal, Carol; Koehler, Philipp; Mercier, Toine; Prattes, Juergen; Lass-Flörl, Cornelia; Martin-Gomez, M Teresa; Buchheidt, Dieter; Pagano, Livio; Gangneux, Jean-Pierre; van de Veerdonk, Frank L; Netea, Mihai G; Carvalho, Agostinho; Hoenigl, MartinInfections caused by invasive molds, including Aspergillus spp., can be difficult to diagnose and remain associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thus, early diagnosis and targeted systemic antifungal treatment remains the most important predictive factor for a successful outcome in immunocompromised individuals with invasive mold infections. Diagnosis remains difficult due to low sensitivities of diagnostic tests including culture and other mycological tests for mold pathogens, particularly in patients on mold-active antifungal prophylaxis. As a result, antifungal treatment is rarely targeted and reliable markers for treatment monitoring and outcome prediction are missing. Thus, there is a need for improved markers to diagnose invasive mold infections, monitor response to treatment, and assist in determining when antifungal therapy should be escalated, switched, or can be stopped. This review focuses on the role of immunologic markers and specifically cytokines in diagnosis and treatment monitoring of invasive mold infections.Item Open Access Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium.(Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020-09) Donnelly, J Peter; Chen, Sharon C; Kauffman, Carol A; Steinbach, William J; Baddley, John W; Verweij, Paul E; Clancy, Cornelius J; Wingard, John R; Lockhart, Shawn R; Groll, Andreas H; Sorrell, Tania C; Bassetti, Matteo; Akan, Hamdi; Alexander, Barbara D; Andes, David; Azoulay, Elie; Bialek, Ralf; Bradsher, Robert W; Bretagne, Stephane; Calandra, Thierry; Caliendo, Angela M; Castagnola, Elio; Cruciani, Mario; Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel; Decker, Catherine F; Desai, Sujal R; Fisher, Brian; Harrison, Thomas; Heussel, Claus Peter; Jensen, Henrik E; Kibbler, Christopher C; Kontoyiannis, Dimitrios P; Kullberg, Bart-Jan; Lagrou, Katrien; Lamoth, Frédéric; Lehrnbecher, Thomas; Loeffler, Jurgen; Lortholary, Olivier; Maertens, Johan; Marchetti, Oscar; Marr, Kieren A; Masur, Henry; Meis, Jacques F; Morrisey, C Orla; Nucci, Marcio; Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis; Pagano, Livio; Patterson, Thomas F; Perfect, John R; Racil, Zdenek; Roilides, Emmanuel; Ruhnke, Marcus; Prokop, Cornelia Schaefer; Shoham, Shmuel; Slavin, Monica A; Stevens, David A; Thompson, George R; Vazquez, Jose A; Viscoli, Claudio; Walsh, Thomas J; Warris, Adilia; Wheat, L Joseph; White, P Lewis; Zaoutis, Theoklis E; Pappas, Peter GBackground
Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential.Methods
To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved.Results
There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses.Conclusions
These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.