Browsing by Author "Palmer, Hannah"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.
    (Neuroscience letters, 2020-05-12) Gamboa, Olga Lucia; Brito, Alexandra; Abzug, Zachary; D'Arbeloff, Tracy; Beynel, Lysianne; Wing, Erik A; Dannhauer, Moritz; Palmer, Hannah; Hilbig, Susan A; Crowell, Courtney A; Liu, Sicong; Donaldson, Rachel; Cabeza, Roberto; Davis, Simon W; Peterchev, Angel V; Sommer, Marc A; Appelbaum, Lawrence G
    The perception of visual motion is dependent on a set of occipitotemporal regions that are readily accessible to neuromodulation. The current study tested if paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) could modulate motion perception by stimulating the occipital cortex as participants viewed near-threshold motion dot stimuli. In this sham-controlled study, fifteen subjects completed two sessions. On the first visit, resting motor threshold (RMT) was assessed, and participants performed an adaptive direction discrimination task to determine individual motion sensitivity. During the second visit, subjects performed the task with three difficulty levels as TMS pulses were delivered 150 and 50 ms prior to motion stimulus onset at 120% RMT, under the logic that the cumulative inhibitory effect of these pulses would alter motion sensitivity. ppTMS was delivered at one of two locations: 3 cm dorsal and 5 cm lateral to inion (scalp-based coordinate), or at the site of peak activation for "motion" according to the NeuroSynth fMRI database (meta-analytic coordinate). Sham stimulation was delivered on one-third of trials by tilting the coil 90°. Analyses showed no significant active-versus-sham effects of ppTMS when stimulation was delivered to the meta-analytic (p = 0.15) or scalp-based coordinates (p = 0.17), which were separated by 29 mm on average. Active-versus-sham stimulation differences did not interact with either stimulation location (p = 0.12) or difficulty (p = 0.33). These findings fail to support the hypothesis that long-interval ppTMS recruits inhibitory processes in motion-sensitive cortex but must be considered within the limited parameters used in this design.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.
    (Neuropsychologia, 2020-10) Gamboa Arana, Olga Lucia; Palmer, Hannah; Dannhauer, Moritz; Hile, Connor; Liu, Sicong; Hamdan, Rena; Brito, Alexandra; Cabeza, Roberto; Davis, Simon W; Peterchev, Angel V; Sommer, Marc A; Appelbaum, Lawrence G
    Despite the widespread use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical care, the dose-response relations and neurophysiological correlates of modulatory effects remain relatively unexplored. To fill this gap, we studied modulation of visual processing as a function of TMS parameters. Our approach combined electroencephalography (EEG) with application of single pulse TMS to visual cortex as participants performed a motion perception task. During each participants' first visit, motion coherence thresholds, 64-channel visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and TMS resting motor thresholds (RMT) were measured. In second and third visits, single pulse TMS was delivered at one of two latencies, either 30 ms before the onset of motion or at the onset latency of the N2 VEP component derived from the first session. TMS was delivered at 0%, 80%, 100%, or 120% of RMT over the site of N2 peak activity, or at 120% over vertex. Behavioral results demonstrated a significant main effect of TMS timing on accuracy, with better performance when TMS was applied at the N2-Onset timing versus Pre-Onset, as well as a significant interaction, indicating that 80% intensity produced higher accuracy than other conditions at the N2-Onset. TMS effects on the P3 VEP showed reduced amplitudes in the 80% Pre-Onset condition, an increase for the 120% N2-Onset condition, and monotonic amplitude scaling with stimulation intensity. The N2 component was not affected by TMS. These findings reveal the influence of TMS intensity and timing on visual perception and electrophysiological responses, with optimal facilitation at stimulation intensities below RMT.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Low- and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between the Postcentral Gyrus and the Insula.
    (Brain connectivity, 2019-05) Addicott, Merideth A; Luber, Bruce; Nguyen, Duy; Palmer, Hannah; Lisanby, Sarah H; Appelbaum, Lawrence Gregory
    The insular cortex supports the conscious awareness of physical and emotional sensations, and the ability to modulate the insula could have important clinical applications in psychiatry. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses transient magnetic fields to induce electrical currents in the superficial cortex. Given its deep location in the brain, the insula may not be directly stimulated by rTMS; however, rTMS may modulate the insula via its functional connections with superficial cortical regions. Furthermore, low- versus high-frequency rTMS is thought to have opposing effects on cortical excitability, and the present study investigated these effects on brain activity and functional connectivity with the insula. Separate groups of healthy participants (n = 14 per group) received low (1 Hz)- or high (10 Hz)-frequency rTMS in five daily sessions to the right postcentral gyrus, a superficial region known to be functionally connected to the insula. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) was measured pre- and post-rTMS. Both 1 and 10 Hz rTMS increased RSFC between the right postcentral gyrus and the left insula. These results suggest that low- and high-frequency rTMS has similar long-term effects on brain activity and RSFC. However, given the lack of difference, we cannot exclude the possibility that these effects are simply due to a nonspecific effect. Given this limitation, these unexpected results underscore the need for acoustic- and stimulation-matched sham control conditions in rTMS research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Site-Specific Effects of Online rTMS during a Working Memory Task in Healthy Older Adults.
    (Brain sciences, 2020-04-27) Beynel, Lysianne; Davis, Simon W; Crowell, Courtney A; Dannhauer, Moritz; Lim, Wesley; Palmer, Hannah; Hilbig, Susan A; Brito, Alexandra; Hile, Connor; Luber, Bruce; Lisanby, Sarah H; Peterchev, Angel V; Cabeza, Roberto; Appelbaum, Lawrence G
    The process of manipulating information within working memory is central to many cognitive functions, but also declines rapidly in old age. Improving this process could markedly enhance the health-span in older adults. The current pre-registered, randomized and placebo-controlled study tested the potential of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied at 5 Hz over the left lateral parietal cortex to enhance working memory manipulation in healthy elderly adults. rTMS was applied, while participants performed a delayed-response alphabetization task with two individually titrated levels of difficulty. Coil placement and stimulation amplitude were calculated from fMRI activation maps combined with electric field modeling on an individual-subject basis in order to standardize dosing at the targeted cortical location. Contrary to the a priori hypothesis, active rTMS significantly decreased accuracy relative to sham, and only in the hardest difficulty level. When compared to the results from our previous study, in which rTMS was applied over the left prefrontal cortex, we found equivalent effect sizes but opposite directionality suggesting a site-specific effect of rTMS. These results demonstrate engagement of cortical working memory processing using a novel TMS targeting approach, while also providing prescriptions for future studies seeking to enhance memory through rTMS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Utilizing transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance laparoscopic technical skills training: A randomized controlled trial.
    (Brain stimulation, 2020-05) Cox, Morgan L; Deng, Zhi-De; Palmer, Hannah; Watts, Amanda; Beynel, Lysianne; Young, Jonathan R; Lisanby, Sarah H; Migaly, John; Appelbaum, Lawrence G
    BACKGROUND:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that delivers constant, low electrical current resulting in changes to cortical excitability. Prior work suggests it may enhance motor learning giving it the potential to augment surgical technical skill acquisition. OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of tDCS, coupled with motor skill training, to accelerate laparoscopic skill acquisition in a pre-registered (NCT03083483), double-blind and placebo-controlled study. We hypothesized that relative to sham tDCS, active tDCS would accelerate the development of laparoscopic technical skills, as measured by the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) Peg Transfer task quantitative metrics. METHODS:In this study, sixty subjects (mean age 22.7 years with 42 females) were randomized into sham or active tDCS in either bilateral primary motor cortex (bM1) or supplementary motor area (SMA) electrode configurations. All subjects practiced the FLS Peg Transfer Task during six 20-min training blocks, which were preceded and followed by a single trial pre-test and post-test. The primary outcome was changes in laparoscopic skill performance over time, quantified by group differences in completion time from pre-test to post-test and learning curves developed from a calculated score accounting for errors. RESULTS:Learning curves calculated over the six 20-min training blocks showed significantly greater improvement in performance for the bM1 group than the sham group (t = 2.07, p = 0.039), with the bM1 group achieving approximately the same amount of improvement in 4 blocks compared to the 6 blocks required of the sham group. The SMA group also showed greater mean improvement than sham, but exhibited more variable learning performance and differences relative to sham were not significant (t = 0.85, p = 0.400). A significant main effect was present for pre-test versus post-test times (F = 133.2, p < 0.001), with lower completion times at post-test, however these did not significantly differ for the training groups. CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic skill training with active bilateral tDCS exhibited significantly greater learning relative to sham. The potential for tDCS to enhance the training of surgical skills, therefore, merits further investigation to determine if these preliminary results may be replicated and extended.