Browsing by Author "Patel, Robin"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Analytical Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Rectal and Pharyngeal Swabs.
    (The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2020-06) Adamson, Paul C; Pandori, Mark W; Doernberg, Sarah B; Komarow, Lauren; Sund, Zoe; Tran, Thuy Tien T; Jensen, David; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Deal, Carolyn D; Chambers, Henry F; Fowler, Vance G; Evans, Scott R; Patel, Robin; Klausner, Jeffrey D; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
    Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in the rectum and pharynx are important extragenital reservoirs of infection. Few assays approved by the US Food and Drug Administration are commercially available to diagnose pharyngeal or rectal infections. The current study reports on the analytical performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay, including the limit of detection, inclusivity, and analytical specificity for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in rectal and pharyngeal specimens. The limit of detection was performed using known concentrations of organisms, elementary bodies per milliliter (EB/mL) for C. trachomatis and colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) for N. gonorrhoeae, in clinical rectal and pharyngeal swab matrices. Inclusivity was performed against 12 serovars of C. trachomatis and seven strains of N. gonorrhoeae. The analytical specificity was performed using 28 different bacteria and viruses. The limit of detection for C. trachomatis was 2.56 EB/mL in pharyngeal specimens and 12.8 EB/mL in rectal specimens. The limit of detection for N. gonorrhoeae was 0.0256 CFU/mL for both pharyngeal and rectal specimens. The inclusivity and analytical specificity were 100% for both rectal and pharyngeal specimens. These analytical performance data demonstrate that the Abbott CT/NG RealTime assay is an accurate, sensitive, and specific assay in rectal and pharyngeal specimens, supporting the potential of the assay for detection of rectal and pharyngeal C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group 2.0: Back to Business.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021-08) Chambers, Henry F; Evans, Scott R; Patel, Robin; Cross, Heather R; Harris, Anthony D; Doi, Yohei; Boucher, Helen W; van Duin, David; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Holland, Thomas L; Pettigrew, Melinda M; Tamma, Pranita D; Hodges, Kathryn R; Souli, Maria; Fowler, Vance G
    In December 2019, the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) was awarded funding for another 7-year cycle to support a clinical research network on antibacterial resistance. ARLG 2.0 has 3 overarching research priorities: infections caused by antibiotic-resistant (AR) gram-negative bacteria, infections caused by AR gram-positive bacteria, and diagnostic tests to optimize use of antibiotics. To support the next generation of AR researchers, the ARLG offers 3 mentoring opportunities: the ARLG Fellowship, Early Stage Investigator seed grants, and the Trialists in Training Program. The purpose of this article is to update the scientific community on the progress made in the original funding period and to encourage submission of clinical research that addresses 1 or more of the research priority areas of ARLG 2.0.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study.
    (The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021-11-09) Wang, Minggui; Earley, Michelle; Chen, Liang; Hanson, Blake M; Yu, Yunsong; Liu, Zhengyin; Salcedo, Soraya; Cober, Eric; Li, Lanjuan; Kanj, Souha S; Gao, Hainv; Munita, Jose M; Ordoñez, Karen; Weston, Greg; Satlin, Michael J; Valderrama-Beltrán, Sandra L; Marimuthu, Kalisvar; Stryjewski, Martin E; Komarow, Lauren; Luterbach, Courtney; Marshall, Steve H; Rudin, Susan D; Manca, Claudia; Paterson, David L; Reyes, Jinnethe; Villegas, Maria V; Evans, Scott; Hill, Carol; Arias, Rebekka; Baum, Keri; Fries, Bettina C; Doi, Yohei; Patel, Robin; Kreiswirth, Barry N; Bonomo, Robert A; Chambers, Henry F; Fowler, Vance G; Arias, Cesar A; van Duin, David; Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Network Investigators

    Background

    Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a global threat. We therefore analysed the bacterial characteristics of CRKP infections and the clinical outcomes of patients with CRKP infections across different countries.

    Methods

    In this prospective, multicentre, cohort study (CRACKLE-2), hospitalised patients with cultures positive for CRKP were recruited from 71 hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, Colombia, Lebanon, Singapore, and the USA. The first culture positive for CRKP was included for each unique patient. Clinical data on post-hospitalisation death and readmission were collected from health records, and whole genome sequencing was done on all isolates. The primary outcome was a desirability of outcome ranking at 30 days after the index culture, and, along with bacterial characteristics and 30-day all-cause mortality (a key secondary outcome), was compared between patients from China, South America, and the USA. The desirability of outcome ranking was adjusted for location before admission, Charlson comorbidity index, age at culture, Pitt bacteremia score, and anatomical culture source through inverse probability weighting; mortality was adjusted for the same confounders, plus region where relevant, through multivariable logistic regression. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03646227, and is complete.

    Findings

    Between June 13, 2017, and Nov 30, 2018, 991 patients were enrolled, of whom 502 (51%) met the criteria for CRKP infection and 489 (49%) had positive cultures that were considered colonisation. We observed little intra-country genetic variation in CRKP. Infected patients from the USA were more acutely ill than were patients from China or South America (median Pitt bacteremia score 3 [IQR 2-6] vs 2 [0-4] vs 2 [0-4]) and had more comorbidities (median Charlson comorbidity index 3 [IQR 2-5] vs 1 [0-3] vs 1 [0-2]). Adjusted desirability of outcome ranking outcomes were similar in infected patients from China (n=246), South America (n=109), and the USA (n=130); the estimates were 53% (95% CI 42-65) for China versus South America, 50% (41-61) for the USA versus China, and 53% (41-66) for the USA versus South America. In patients with CRKP infections, unadjusted 30-day mortality was lower in China (12%, 95% CI 8-16; 29 of 246) than in the USA (23%, 16-30; 30 of 130) and South America (28%, 20-37; 31 of 109). Adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality was higher in South America than in China (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·82, 95% CI 2·22-10·50) and the USA (aOR 3·34, 1·50-7·47), with the mortality difference between the USA and China no longer being significant (aOR 1·44, 0·70-2·96).

    Interpretation

    Global CRKP epidemics have important regional differences in patients' baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, and in bacterial characteristics. Research findings from one region might not be generalisable to other regions.

    Funding

    The National Institutes of Health.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinically Adjudicated Reference Standards for Evaluation of Infectious Diseases Diagnostics.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023-03) Patel, Robin; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Evans, Scott; Fowler, Vance G; Doernberg, Sarah B; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
    Lack of a gold standard can present a challenge for evaluation of diagnostic test accuracy of some infectious diseases tests, particularly when the test's accuracy potentially exceeds that of its predecessors. This approach may measure agreement with an imperfect reference, rather than correctness, because the right answer is unknown. Solutions consist of multitest comparators, including those that involve a test under evaluation if multiple new tests are being evaluated together, using latent class modeling, and clinically adjudicated reference standards. Clinically adjudicated reference standards may be considered as comparator methods when no predefined test or composite of tests is sufficiently accurate; they emulate clinical practice in that multiple data pieces are clinically assessed together.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    COVID-19-Lessons Learned and Questions Remaining.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021-06) Fang, Ferric C; Benson, Constance A; Del Rio, Carlos; Edwards, Kathryn M; Fowler, Vance G; Fredricks, David N; Limaye, Ajit P; Murray, Barbara E; Naggie, Susanna; Pappas, Peter G; Patel, Robin; Paterson, David L; Pegues, David A; Petri, William A; Schooley, Robert T
    In this article, the editors of Clinical Infectious Diseases review some of the most important lessons they have learned about the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify essential questions about COVID-19 that remain to be answered.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Envisioning Future UTI Diagnostics.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021-08-31) Patel, Robin; Polage, Christopher R; Dien Bard, Jennifer; May, Larissa; Lee, Francesca M; Fabre, Valeria; Hayden, Mary K; Doernberg, Sarah DB; Haake, David A; Trautner, Barbara W; Grigoryan, Larissa; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Hanson, Kimberly E
    Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections in the United States and are a major driver of antibiotic use - both appropriate and inappropriate - across healthcare settings. UTI treatment has become complex due to antibacterial resistance; one quarter of urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli in the United States in 2017 were resistant to fluoroquinolones and one third to trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (1), agents with historically predictable activity against E. coli. As a result, more broad-spectrum antibiotics are being used to treat UTIs, contributing to selection of further antibiotic resistance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    MASTERMIND: Bringing Microbial Diagnostics to the Clinic.
    (Clin Infect Dis, 2017-02-01) Patel, Robin; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Petzold, Elizabeth; Fowler, Vance G; Klausner, Jeffrey D; Evans, Scott; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG)
    New diagnostics are urgently needed to address emerging antimicrobial resistance. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group proposes a strategy called MASTERMIND (Master Protocol for Evaluating Multiple Infection Diagnostics) for advancement of infectious diseases diagnostics. The goal of this strategy is to generate the data necessary to support US Food and Drug Administration clearance of new diagnostic tests by promoting research that might not have otherwise been feasible with conventional trial designs. MASTERMIND uses a single subject's sample(s) to evaluate multiple diagnostic tests at the same time, providing efficiencies of specimen collection and characterization. MASTERMIND also offers central trial organization, standardization of methods and definitions, and common comparators.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Simultaneous Evaluation of Diagnostic Assays for Pharyngeal and Rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Using a Master Protocol.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020-12) Doernberg, Sarah B; Komarow, Lauren; Tran, Thuy Tien T; Sund, Zoe; Pandori, Mark W; Jensen, David; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Deal, Carolyn D; Chambers, Henry F; Fowler, Vance G; Evans, Scott R; Patel, Robin; Klausner, Jeffrey D

    Background

    Pharyngeal and rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis play important roles in infection and antibacterial resistance transmission, but no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assays for detection at these sites existed prior to this study. The objective was to estimate performance of assays to detect those infections in pharyngeal and rectal specimens to support regulatory submission.

    Methods

    We performed a cross-sectional, single-visit study of adults seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at 9 clinics in 7 states. We collected pharyngeal and rectal swabs from participants. The primary outcome was positive and negative percent agreement for detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis for 3 investigational assays compared to a composite reference. Secondary outcomes included positivity as well as positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios. Subgroup analyses included outcomes by symptom status and sex.

    Results

    A total of 2598 participants (79% male) underwent testing. We observed N. gonorrhoeae positivity of 8.1% in the pharynx and 7.9% in the rectum and C. trachomatis positivity of 2.0% in the pharynx and 8.7% in the rectum. Positive percent agreement ranged from 84.8% to 96.5% for different anatomic site infection combinations, whereas negative percent agreement was 98.8% to 99.6%.

    Conclusions

    This study utilized a Master Protocol to generate diagnostic performance data for multiple assays from different manufacturers in a single study population, which ultimately supported first-in-class FDA clearance for extragenital assays. We observed very good positive percent agreement when compared to a composite reference method for the detection of both pharyngeal and rectal N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis.

    Clinical trials registration

    NCT02870101.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Molecular Diagnostic Testing.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023-12) Hayden, Mary K; Hanson, Kimberly E; Englund, Janet A; Lee, Mark J; Loeb, Mark; Lee, Francesca; Morgan, Daniel J; Patel, Robin; El Mikati, Ibrahim K; Iqneibi, Shahad; Alabed, Farouk; Amarin, Justin Z; Mansour, Razan; Patel, Payal; Falck-Ytter, Yngve; Morgan, Rebecca L; Murad, M Hassan; Sultan, Shahnaz; Bhimraj, Adarsh; Mustafa, Reem A
    Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and for identifying asymptomatic carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests continues to increase as does the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss nuances of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlight important unmet research needs related to COVID-19 diagnostic testing. IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. The panel agreed on 12 diagnostic recommendations. Access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public health response to COVID-19 infection. Information on the clinical performance of available tests continues to grow, but the quality of evidence of the current literature to support this updated molecular diagnostic guideline remains moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is suggested for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions. Evidence in support of rapid testing and testing of upper respiratory specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs, which offer logistical advantages, is sufficient to warrant conditional recommendations in favor of these approaches.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing.
    (Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021-01-22) Hanson, Kimberly E; Caliendo, Angela M; Arias, Cesar A; Hayden, Mary K; Englund, Janet A; Lee, Mark J; Loeb, Mark; Patel, Robin; El Alayli, Abdallah; Altayar, Osama; Patel, Payal; Falck-Ytter, Yngve; Lavergne, Valery; Morgan, Rebecca L; Murad, M Hassan; Sultan, Shahnaz; Bhimraj, Adarsh; Mustafa, Reem A

    Background

    Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Direct detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens informs patient, healthcare institution and public health level decision-making. The numbers of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests are rapidly increasing, as is the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recognized a significant need for frequently updated systematic reviews of the literature to inform evidence-based best practice guidance.

    Objective

    The IDSA's goal was to develop an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss the nuance of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings and highlight important unmet research needs in the COVID-19 diagnostic testing space.

    Methods

    IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations.

    Results

    The panel agreed on 17 diagnostic recommendations.

    Conclusions

    Universal access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention and the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Information on the clinical performance of available tests is rapidly emerging, but the quality of evidence of the current literature is considered moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is recommended for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case. Testing asymptomatic individuals without known exposure is suggested when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions, dictate eligibility for surgery, or inform solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation timing. Ultimately, prioritization of testing will depend on institutional-specific resources and the needs of different patient populations.